This asinine fellow - whose fruity surname fits him to a T - is an open and avowed sodomite. That's pretty much all anyone needs to know about him. fαɢɢօts - as a political entity, relatively new arrivistes though they may be - exist almost entirely as an engine of projected self-loathing, impotent rage, and shame-fueled shamelessness. They've had the whole world handed to them on a silver platter over the course of the past decade especially, and it's not enough. It never will be. They know, deep down, that their whole raison d'etre as a group is illegitimate and monstrously immoral. But rather than listening to the pangs of their conscience and fleeing from Sodom, they double down on their diabolically narcissistic disorder, and spew all of that very justified self-hatred outward. And their Jєωιѕн masters and enablers, as they have ever done, focus this pathological animus like a laser onto the eternal target: The Christian / Western / European / sɛҳuąƖly Normal Man.
The fact that Lemon is also a negro makes him that much more precious to the Jєωιѕн elite. After all, going back at least a century, when the NAACP was founded by a group of Jєωιѕн socio-political agitators, the American negro has been the vanguard of the legions of Jєωιѕн proxy warriors against America, which has ever been to them an outpost of hated Christendom, destined and deserving of destruction. "Intersectionality" is now all the rage and Lemon is in a close to ideal tier on the totem of noble victimhood: Black
and Queer. So when he opines on what group is the "biggest threat" to American society, what would we expect him to say? Sodomites - who pose a grave and immediate threat to both the moral health of our nation (especially in the overtures they've made in recent years toward children*) and its physical health (being walking vectors of AIDS, Hepatitis C, and Rectal Cancer)? Negroes - who, despite being only 12% of the country's population, commit 80% of the violent crime? Heavens, no! No group to which poor, ennobled victim Don Lemon belongs could possibly have any remotely deleterious effect on society. No, the great danger is that archvillain who victimized and, by his very existence, continues to victimize all the poor, disenfranchised souls on the intersectional totem pole: The White Man!
It is precisely because of rhetoric like this, and the exponentially increasing frequency and vitriol with which it is expressed, that I have abandoned my former adherence to the (E. Michael) Jonesian notion that "White People" is an ahistorical pseudo-identity imposed on Europeans and European Americans, and therefore, undeserving of our allegiance or even our serious consideration. It is true enough that, in times past, when America's northern urban centers were strongholds of Catholic Europeans, divided along ethnic lines (Irish, German, Italian, Polish), the notion that these disparate groups constituted a single "White Race" was one as odd and foreign to them in New York, Boston, Philadelphia, and Chicago, as it would have been in Ireland, Germany, Italy or Poland. And when the Jєωs and their allies imported the racial strife of the American South into the urban north, it was indeed an imposition of that foreign concept. But we're more than five decades along now since that rabblerousing, philandering, Marxist pimp Martin Luther King brought his race war to a Chicago neighborhood full of Lithuanians who were guilty of nothing at all apart from having the Christian Faith and white skin that marked them as sons of Christendom, the eternal racial - yes,
racial - enemy of the eternal Jєω.
We all know that the Jєωs are more than a mere "religious group." They are an ethno-religious group, whose race and religion are inexorably intertwined. And while the Catholic Faith has no such racial exclusivity, still
the Jєωs see it that way. Just as an atheist Jєω is still a Jєω to his coreligionists, an atheist or heretical or apostate European is still a son of Christendom to a Jєω. You need only look at their rhetoric on the subject to realize that. Case in point:
And so it won't do to retreat, as I have done in the past, in a cowardly fashion, to a view of racial identity that was dead by the time I was born. To my enemy I am a "white man." So be it. I am a Catholic first, and, right after that, a son of Christendom; Europa. I will stand with my white brethren when we are attacked in this multicultural mess of country;yes, even with the orthodox schismatics and Protestant heretics among them. Why? They are my cousins; my blood. My own flesh-and-blood brother left the church years ago and fell in with a protestant sect. If we were all gathered for some family function under one roof and an invader came in, threatening to kill us, or if a fire swept through the house, would I be excused from my familial bonds and duties to him because of his heresy? Could I let him, son of my mother, who had once been a Catholic and by God's grace could be again, perish horribly because of his error? No, of course not. So it is with your family, so it is with your race, which is your extended family.
To quote Aragorn: "Open war is upon you, whether you would have it or not."
*Lemon has casually admitted that he was sɛҳuąƖly abused as a child, but is, unsurprisingly, unable / unwilling to draw the logical conclusion that that evil act of corruption is what caused his sodomitical inclination. It almost always is, along with an impaired relationship with one's father. I don't know the particulars of Lemon's relationship with his father, but if it is typical of what most American negroes experience - which is to say, no relationship at all - then that would complete the picture of the origins Lemon's "ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity." As usual, none of these pesky facts serve the canonical anti-whitey narrative, so let's just have done with them altogether.
Topic: CNN Anchor Says 'White Men' are the biggest Terror Threat to U.S. (Read 340 times)