Author Topic: Churchill murdered German civilians in cold blood (Read 1041 times)

Matthew · « **on:** May 19, 2014, 11:18:29 PM »

Truth emerges - millions of German murdered by psychopath Churchill's fire bombs

Does anyone really believe things have changed today, and that the same people DON'T run this world today?

Shooting these Z's would be too good and quick! Had the people's of the world ONLY KNOWN THEN the truth, these evil people could
have been beaten during WW2 and beaten forever

With most populations around the world asleep today, what are the chances of good prevailing over evil?

Me thinks its beyond mankind's control Without unity of the people, no hope

Truth emerges -

~millions of Germans murdered by psychopath-sodomite Winston Churchill's fire bombs ...

~many thousand’s of German women raped by Stalin’s Rape squads ...

h0Ɩ0cαųst over Dresden, known as the Florence of the North. Dresden was a hospital city for wounded soldiers. Not one military unit, not one anti-aircraft battery was deployed in the city.

Together with 600,000 refugees from Breslau, Dresden was filled with 1.2 million people.

Churchill had asked for "suggestions how to blaze 600,000 refugees". He wasn't interested in military installations 60 miles away .

More than 700,000 phosphorus bombs were dropped on 1.2 million people. One bomb for every 2 people. The temperature in the centre of the city reached 1600 degrees centigrade.

More than 260,000 bodies and residues of bodies were counted. But those who perished in the centre of the city can't be traced.

Approximately 500,000 children, women, the elderly, wounded soldiers and the animals of the zoo were murdered in one night.

[2001] TERROR BOMBING: THE CRIME OF THE TWENTIETH CENTURY by Michael Walsh <http://www.whale.to/b/walsh1.html>

Winston Churchill and the War Department set up a situation where London would be blitzed, without telling the people that Britain had started the process several months earlier.

This had the effect of getting Britons into a mood for total war, without the traditional restraints of civilised ‘laws’ or conventions, restraints which had hitherto established that civilians would not as such be targeted
In March 1942 Churchill’s War Cabinet adopted the ‘Lindemann plan’, whereby civilian targeting became official.

Working-class homes were preferred to upper-class because they were closer together, and so a greater flesh-incineration-per-bomb could be achieved.

The Jєωιѕн German émigré Professor Frederick Lindemann, Churchill's friend and scientific advisor had by then become Lord Cherwell. He submitted a plan to the War Cabinet on March 30th urging that German working-class houses be targeted in preference to military objectives, the latter being harder to hit. Middle-class homes had too much space around them, he explained.

He was not prosecuted for a ghastly new war-crime, hitherto undreamt-of. Thereby all cities and town over 50,000 inhabitants could be destroyed, or at least brought to ruin. The War Cabinet realised that no inkling of this must reach the public. How Britain Pioneered City Bombing <http://www.codoh.com/newrevoices/nrcitybomb.html>
Churchill condoned the Soviet rape squads sent into Germany at the wars end

and helped Stalin hide the Soviet Katyn Forest murders, like Stalin, blaming the Germans for the crime...

On Churchill’s orders the S.O.E murdered Reinhardt Heydrich in order to bring reprisals on the Czech’s and thereby harden their resolve against Germany.

The papers reveal that Churchill joked about the huge bombing raids on defenceless German dormitory towns. Sir Anthony Blunt said that as the war was closing, Churchill did not want to feed or house large numbers of German refugees, and preferred them burnt in their homes......

Also mentioned is Churchill’s wish to murder Ghandi, who was against the violence of the war....

Russian spy Ursula Kuczinsky, codenamed ” Sonja” serviced Oxford during W W II and claimed Chamberlain was murdered by Churchill after he accepted 50,0000 pounds from the Rothschild syndicate to take the country to war.

“Winston Churchill was a man of blood and a politico without principle, whose apotheosis serves to corrupt every standard of honesty and morality in politics and history.” --Ralph Raico

[2008] Was Churchill a “h0Ɩ0cαųst Denier”? By T Stokes <http://www.whale.to/c/was_churchill.html>

Neil Obstat · « **Reply #1 on:** May 20, 2014, 01:59:38 AM »

Quote from: Matthew

[2008] Was Churchill a “h0Ɩ0cαųst Denier”? By T Stokes < http://www.whale.to/c/was_churchill.html >

Quote from: www.whale.to/c/was_churchill.html

Was Churchill a “h0Ɩ0cαųst Denier”?

By T Stokes on December 18, 2008

It has long been assumed that the Churchill archives at Cambridge had been edited, giving a sanitized account that glossed over much of recent history.

However, against all the rules, thousands of pages of minutes have been saved in their original state, which present a drastically different version of events.

Maybe +F took a lesson from this handling of the Churchill files, and made sure the "thousands of pages of minutes" from the sermons of ABL were securely in his own possession, before he produced the selective amnesia movie about ABL's life. The 'editing' is now done only AFTER the truth has been sufficiently suppressed.

.

JPaul · « **Reply #2 on:** May 20, 2014, 07:29:33 AM »

It is almost always the case that when new unprecedented methods or implements of wholesale murder, degradation, or destruction are devised , the Jєω is at the forefront.

They are truly a race of destroyers.

Neil Obstat · « **Reply #3 on:** May 20, 2014, 09:58:28 AM »

Quote from: J.Paul

It is almost always the case that when new unprecedented methods or implements of wholesale murder, degradation, or destruction are devised , the Jєω is at the forefront.

They are truly a race of destroyers.

That's an interesting outlook, J.Paul. It's worth thinking about in context of its exemplification, lest it be criticized as a "sweeping statement." (To be sure, the Anti Definition League would hang their hate-speech label on it, that is, they do with "inciting racial unrest" in Germany, because it's something the Jєωs don't like to hear being said. That's because the Anti Definition League is all about inciting racial unrest, all the while being immune from the accusation thereof! That's their purpose in life.)

Sometimes a mental image helps.

Imagine a Jєωιѕн rabbi-looking man, with a black hat and long beard and tassels hanging from his black coat, walking down the sidewalk in a busy city. He approaches another man who is walking towards him and stands in front of the approaching man, impeding his progress, and begins to shout insults into his face. The Jєω's rhetoric escalates, and in short order he SLAPS the man's cheek as he shouts into his face, while demanding that the man he just slapped must STOP OFFENDING the Jєω. This clash of logic is so alarming to the recipient of this whole charade that in his confusion he doesn't know what to do. The Jєω continues to insult him to his face and to dish out orders to him to STOP HIS TIRADE of insults, and then SLAPS him again, yelling at him to stop hitting the Jєω. But the man isn't hitting and the man isn't insulting. This is all the Jєω doing these things. Someone has notified the police, and a foot patrol officer arrives, and immediately the Jєω complains to the policeman that this man has been insulting him and slapping his face and that he demands that this insulting behavior stop immediately. The police officer is trained to first listen to the complaints of someone making accusations, so he is convinced in his mind that of course, the Jєω has been receiving insults and getting hit by this other man. If it all goes down as planned, the silent man who has become a victim of Jєωιѕн rhetoric and invective gets handcuffs put on him and is taken into the Police Station for questioning. But the rabbi is allowed to go free.

Any report in the newspaper will say that an αnтι-ѕємιтє was arrested and taken into custody for questioning about his anti-Semitism.

.

JPaul · « **Reply #4 on:** May 20, 2014, 06:55:05 PM »

Yes, a very astute analogy, the wailing voice of the eternal victim as he plunges the dagger into your back...........