Author Topic: Chemtrails (Read 7230 times)

ServusSpiritusSancti · « **Reply #45 on:** October 27, 2011, 02:35:50 PM »

Quote from: Man of the West

Look, you really do not know all that much about my life. You don't know what I might have dealt with or thought about in the past. I'm very saddened by everybody's willingness to simply assign me to a camp, to conclude that I'm naive, a neocon, a NWO stooge, or just plain ignorant. You cluck your tongues and mutter, "There are none so blind as those who will not see," or words to that effect, and then you think you have me fixed in your mind -- all figured out. But it's not that simple.

MoW, I did not attack your character, nor did I label you as any of the things you mentioned in your reply. I didn't call you anything, all I did was ask you if you believed in the nєω ωσrℓ∂ σr∂єr and how you responded to three well-known figures calling for one.

People in this country can't seem to inhale the slightest possibility that we have a crooked government run by Freemasons. But it's not all that hard to believe. Governments in many other countries in world history have been corrupt, is IS possible. See, Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ is behind the NWO just as Masons were behind the infiltration of the Church. If you believe Masons infiltrated the Church, then you should have no problem believing that they infiltrated the government as well.

TKGS · « **Reply #46 on:** October 27, 2011, 03:40:24 PM »

Quote from: Man of the West

Quote from: Caminus
Quote from: TKGS
Quote from: Man of the West
If the jets to which Caminus referred in the original post had been military, or otherwise suspicious, I’m sure he would have identified them as such,

I don't know about anyone else, but I find it difficult to identify specific types of aircraft when they are flying overhead at 30,000 feet.

Ditto.

Then you would find it especially difficult to to accurately identify and discriminate between atmospheric phenomena of which you've shown no comprehension. Proof positive that you ought to learn a bit more about these subjects before making wild accusations.

Actually, I do not find it difficult at all to identify what looks like contrails that take hours and hours to dissapate and criss-cross the sky. I also do not find it difficult to realize that before about ten or so years ago, I have no memory of ever seeing this atmospheric phenomena.

On the other hand, I readily admit that I do not comprehend this. I also readily admit that your explanation doesn't make sense unless the laws of nature have been recently changed. Perhaps an amendment was inserted into an omnibus spending bill or was it part of the Y2K problem?

Croix de Fer · « **Reply #47 on:** October 28, 2011, 02:04:04 PM »

Not sure if anybody has seen this:

Diego · « **Reply #48 on:** October 28, 2011, 02:44:53 PM »

Chemtrails have been on the periphery of my worldly worries, so I paid little attention until I read that the US govt, after decades of denial, acknowledged that they were seeding barium and aluminum salts for "geo-engineering."

What was most interesting to me was that chemtrails were another instance of protracted US govt denial followed by admission (or incontrovertible evidence of government lying, e.g., the FLIR video showing men dismounting from a tank to set fire to the Branch Davidians' home in Waco, followed by the men machine-gunning people fleeing the burning building).

I did not bother to archive the chemtrail admission, but I suspect that if you do a search for chemtrails at http://www.activistpost.com, you will find a link to the admission. If you don't find it, I don't really care and I don't really want to hear about it. I sure can't—and don't want to—encyclopedically archive the evidence of every wicked thing this wicked government does.

Hoffman and Heimbichner refer to the technique as "freeze and thaw" and "revelation of the method."

Waco
OKC
radiation testing on soldiers
LSD studies on unknowing civilians
Tuskegee syphillis study
Serratia marsescens biowarfare aerosols over the SF Bay Area (and other such biowarfare testing on unknowing innocents)
9/11
Gulf of Tonkin incident
USS Maine sinking
USS Liberty attack by the Zionists
WMD in Iraq

"" @ time stamp 3:09

gladius_veritatis · « **Reply #49 on:** October 29, 2011, 06:23:31 PM »

Here are a couple links to the work of this man:

David L. Griscom vitae: B.S. in Physics, Carnegie-Mellon University 1960, Ph.D. in Physics, Brown University, 1966. Fellow, American Physical Society. Fellow, American Association for the Advancement of Science. Fellow, American Ceramic Society. Member, Geological Society of America. Research Physicist at Naval Research Laboratory (NRL), Washington, DC, 1967-2001. Fulbright-García Robles Fellow at Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 1997. Invited Professor of Research at Universités de Paris-6 & 7, Lyon-1, et St-Etienne (France) and Tokyo Institute of Technology, 2000-2004. Adjunct Professor of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Arizona, 2004-2005. Consultancy: impactGlass research international, 2005-present. Winner, one national and two international research awards and honored by Brown University with a “Distinguished Graduate School Alumnus” award. Author, 193 papers in peer-reviewed journals and books, principal author of 112 of these.

http://impactglassman.blogspot.com/2007/01/hand-waving-physics-of-911.html

http://impactglassman.blogspot.com/2010/09/911-truth-evidence-of-energetic.html

Here is a vid about the psychological reasons why some still fail to grasp/face the truth about 9/11:

http://911truth.org/article.php?story=20111019043253792

There is so much evidence that contradicts the official story that it is no longer rational to accept the nonsense of Officialdom. Accepting it means lying to oneself and, as a consequence, failing to understand the events of the last ten years (or reality as a whole). Wake up, face reality, and trust that the truth alone sets us free...

Enjoy :)