Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Chemtrails  (Read 7227 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Chemtrails
« Reply #15 on: October 26, 2011, 07:40:22 AM »
Quote from: Man of the West

In a manner of speaking, yes. I studied engineering physics and "Earth Systems Sciences" (which is basically geology with an interdisciplinary outreach toward meteorology, biology, and chemistry) at the Colorado School of Mines. I've also studied philosophy up to the graduate level at CU. Not that I place much emphasis on this, but perhaps it is helpful, from time to time, to mention that I am not entirely without authority in such matters.

And you're welcome.  :cool:


Very nice! Well its good that you share this with us. For myself, this particular subject isn't that interesting. You seem good-willed and like a good Catholic. Its good that you share your knowledge with us, even if we disagree most of the time. I hope that doesn't stop you from posting here, though I could imagine it would be discouraging. Even though I disagree with some of your positions, specifically on the conspiracy related subjects, I like reading the counter-points as well. Its good not to just read one 'side' constantly.

Offline gladius_veritatis

  • Supporter
Chemtrails
« Reply #16 on: October 26, 2011, 12:39:23 PM »
Flub :)


Offline gladius_veritatis

  • Supporter
Chemtrails
« Reply #17 on: October 26, 2011, 12:44:13 PM »
Quote from: Man of the West
Do you mean to suggest that commercial airlines -- who can scarcely make a profit to begin with, who are already taking every measure to cut weight and fuel consumption -- are not only loading up their planes with hundreds of additional pounds of chemtrail dust, but deliberately flying out of their way with their increased burden to make "patterns" in the sky, and that the longsuffering passangers with their GPS-equipped smartphones never notice the detour? And for what end, to make clouds? Now that is ridiculous.


Where did I mention that this is being done by commercial airliners?  What is ridiculous is your boxing with a shadow of your making.  Boy, you CREAMED that shadow, Boss...way to go!

Quote
But even supposing, per impossibile, that the airlines were up there wasting time making clouds, absolutely nothing bad has resulted from any of this.


Again...boxing with shadows.
 
Quote
Epic fail, Eamon. Utterly pathetic.


Not really, as I already knew you use the sorry excuse that follows, you arrogant sack.

Quote
The vast majority of the planes that you'll see flying over metropolitan areas will (obviously) be those flying into or out of the airport(s); hence flying at low altitudes, were contrails do not naturally form anyway.


This is plain to all.

Quote
Once an airliner reaches its cruising altitude there is no particular reason for it to fly over a city


Who said anything about flying right over a city?  No one.  MoW, your reading comprehension is in need of some serious improvement.  An airplane at 35K ft, say, would not even need to fly directly over a city in order to be visible to the inhabitants of that city and for miles in all directions.  Surely you grasp this.

Quote
since it will take the most economical flightpath toward its destination, and since most of the country is uninhabited


That may be true for large chunks of the western US, but it sure as hell is NOT true east of the Mississippi.  Get a new argument.

Quote
high altitude jets are not seen with any exaggerated frequency over urban areas, and there would be no reason to expect an especially large number of contrails to appear there.


Again, I said "an area", not specifying urban or rural.

Quote
But if your theory were correct, then you might see an escalating number of chemtrails at low altitudes, since flying low over an urban corridor would be the optimum way to disperse whatever nefarious agent you allege they're afflicting upon us, hitting the densest population centers at the least cost.


LOL!  I never said the goal was to directly affect densely populated areas, did I?  BTW, if they did what you suggest, even the most calcified boneheads would suspect something ;)

MoW, push your disinfo/pseudo-science somewhere else.  You argue with points that were NEVER MADE -- and then you want arrogantly present yourself as scientifically literate!  This forum is not for kewl-aiders nor shadow-boxing douche bags.

Chemtrails
« Reply #18 on: October 26, 2011, 01:04:51 PM »
GV,
Ending a comment to someone with "you arrogant sack" and other names does not help your side of the arguement.  

Do you call people names in face-to-face conversations or do you only resort to name-calling on the internet?  

Since I know that you have experience teaching young students I am going to keep hoping for better manners from you.  

Offline gladius_veritatis

  • Supporter
Chemtrails
« Reply #19 on: October 26, 2011, 01:05:52 PM »
I suppose this professional meteorologist is just scientifically illiterate...



Seriously, one has to be a willfully-blind kewl-aid guzzler or just plain stupid to buy the absurd explanation that chemtrails are really just contrails.