Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Charlie Hebdo- fαℓѕє fℓαg?  (Read 3696 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Vandaler

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1664
  • Reputation: +33/-7
  • Gender: Male
Charlie Hebdo- fαℓѕє fℓαg?
« Reply #15 on: February 04, 2015, 03:30:06 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: hollingsworth
    Vandaler, were these shooters so stupid as to leave an ID of one of them on the front seat of the escape vehicle? Was the apparently downed cop in the street outside building dispatched with an AK47 round to the head as apparently shown in the video?  Who informed the shooters that the Hebdo staff was meeting, so that they could be there just in time to deal with them collectively?  How come other workers in the office were not shot and killed?  How could the alleged shooters have been discovered so quickly after the event?  Were they stupid?  To have masterminded such a plot, carried it out, made their escape, and then be killed themselves so soon afterwards.   It doesn't add up to me.  One thing seems to be pretty clear now.  The Hebdo massacre seems to have fallen out of the news cycle.  Is that because the corporate media knows that there are too many unanswered questions, and that they'd better drop the matter now before folks start taking a really close look at it and the truth comes out?


    *Sigh*

    Were these shooters so stupid as to leave an ID of one of them on the front seat of the escape vehicle?

    Not a sign of stupidity to me, but rather of high stress and a lack of professionalism.  You omit, choose to ignore completely the mistakes they did prior the shootings (entering the wrong building) and rather glorify them to the point of thinking only hyper professionals like CIA or Mossad can pull it off.  

    You're massaging the data.  






    Offline Centroamerica

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2694
    • Reputation: +1685/-456
    • Gender: Male
    Charlie Hebdo- fαℓѕє fℓαg?
    « Reply #16 on: February 04, 2015, 03:35:39 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Charlie religion

    Masonry: the official religion: The Charlie religion

    Three religions are fighting today France:

    - traditional religion ( Catholic )
    - the new religion ( Islamic )
    - the official religion ( Masonic )

    - The first is that the man goes to God by incorporating Jesus Christ , God come down to us.
    - The second is that the man is still far from God by submitting to Muhammad declares unreachable God .
    - The third wants man becomes aware that he is God - no other object or reference that himself.

    Everything would be perfectly clear if the third religion did not have the habit of advancing masked . She is constrained by its doctrine, because the man in the street sees very clearly that he does is not God. Nothing is more obvious to him. To impose the Masonic dogma, the official religion must proceed by steps . It transmits its ideas in a coded language whose key comes gradually to insiders, within the Lodges.


    All the official vocabulary of the Masonic Republic thus encoded. The words "freedom", "equality", "brotherhood", "secularism", "tolerance", "democracy" (etc.) have a double meaning : a trivial sense, or exoteric , the use of profane and hidden meaning - Masonic - reserved for insiders.

    The Masonic inspiration institutions also have two faces - and Charlie-Hebdo is one. (Its main shareholder, Bernard Maris , was a member of the Grand Orient). It is even a typical example.

    If there is a newspaper that could not have thought of call "religious", it's Charlie-Hebdo . When asked, most of its writers and its readers proudly classify in the category of "no religion". But where do, so their obsessions on this? Their morbid obstinacy to wallow in blasphemy?

    Officially, it is to exalt the "freedom of expression", the "right to blasphemy" would be the condition sine qua non and unsurpassable summit. But who can believe it? Everyone knows that for Charlie-Hebdo today, as Voltaire yesterday, and all Masons of all time, "freedom of expression" is an absolute that when these gentlemen in need. She suddenly ceases to be when it comes, for example, the right to speak of God in public schools, or in other areas, laws Pleven , gαyssot , Neiertz , Taubira , etc. (Need I remind you that Dr. Dor was heavily condemned by the "Justice" of the Masonic Republic just to have expressed his opposition to prenatal murder?) Sacred Heart of Jesus

    You can return the problem every way, the only consistent solution is that these people are, in reality, the devotees who are unaware . They perform their worship as M. Jourdain wrote prose: without even realizing it. But they do have a faith, liturgy, religious obligations. The blasphemy is for them a veritable rite . Humanity Is not God? A jealous god! Which can suffer from rival! We must break the idols, and zealots Charlie-Hebdo use it faithfully every week.

    Heirs of the Huguenots iconoclastic  and revolutionary Septembrists , cartoonists of Charlie-Hebdo exercise in the Masonic Republic, a real religious function . Dressed as clowns (as in masonry, all dressed up), it is, if not the chief priests, at least the great priests of the Plan.

    Because there is no religion without sacrifice
    - For up to God, the Christian, offered himself as a sacrifice (for Christ )
    - To avenge his God, the Muslim sacrifices others (like Muhammad )
    - To be convinced that he is god, the Freemason trying to sacrifice the God of others (in effigy).

    Is this simple comparison sufficient enough to discern the true religion ?

    http://www.dominicainsavrille.fr/la-religion-de-charlie/
    We conclude logically that religion can give an efficacious and truly realistic answer to the great modern problems only if it is a religion that is profoundly lived, not simply a superficial and cheap religion made up of some vocal prayers and some ceremonies...


    Offline hollingsworth

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2834
    • Reputation: +2933/-523
    • Gender: Male
    Charlie Hebdo- fαℓѕє fℓαg?
    « Reply #17 on: February 07, 2015, 04:00:33 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Vandaler, you can fake a sigh all you want.  The almost certain fact is:  Alternative media got to the story fast enough so as to debunk it as an obvious fαℓѕє fℓαg.  The cop down on the sidewalk, who is obviously not shot by the "terrorist" with a burst from his AK47, is just one of the more obvious videoed frauds.  The story has pretty much fallen off the news cycle, because some sharp people got ahead of the major media, and put out the truth before the jews could make hay of it.  They were successful initially, I admit, in getting a million plus Frenchmen out on the street.  But many of those same French citizens have had time to think about it.  fαℓѕє fℓαg, my friend.  Probably carried out by nice Jєωιѕн boys from Mossad. :smoke-pot:

    Offline PerEvangelicaDicta

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2049
    • Reputation: +1285/-0
    • Gender: Female
    Charlie Hebdo- fαℓѕє fℓαg?
    « Reply #18 on: February 08, 2015, 12:41:35 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Good link Centroamerica.  The translation is a little funky, but we get the gist. Thank you for that effort.
    Sadly, not enough Catholics, including trads, understand Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ.

    Offline Vandaler

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1664
    • Reputation: +33/-7
    • Gender: Male
    Charlie Hebdo- fαℓѕє fℓαg?
    « Reply #19 on: February 08, 2015, 09:44:57 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: hollingsworth
    ... The almost certain fact is:  Alternative media got to the story fast enough so as to debunk it as an obvious fαℓѕє fℓαg.  The cop down on the sidewalk, who is obviously not shot by the "terrorist" with a burst from his AK47, is just one of the more obvious videoed frauds.


    Hollingsworth, here take this shovel, and dig yourself even deeper.

    What does the above mean... you're saying the downed cop (Ahmed Merabat) was not shot to his death as the video shows?  What happened instead?  

    If it was the video that is false, Ahmed Merabat would still be alive.
    If the video was real, but the events staged, Ahmed Merabat would still be alive.

    Of course then, his funerals were part of the false falg as well then.
    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/france/11338404/Funeral-for-French-policeman-Ahmed-Merabet-held-in-Paris.html

    Please explain.