Today marks the first time I've ever been censored (answer deleted, answering ability for a specific question blocked) on a StackExchange site, spec. my answer to the "Christianity" StackExchange question "
Why did the Catholic Church change so radically after Vatican II in regards to the status of Jєωs?." Here's my "sanitized" version, which they still won't post:
«It's said that the full deposit of the faith was revealed by Jesus. For example, before Vatican II the Church was overtly anti-Jєωιѕн.»
A classic example would be the Jesuit's Civiltà Cattolica articles:
• Jєωιѕн Ritual Murder (1881)
• Jєωιѕн Question in Europe (1890)
The Church has always been against Judaism, but never against Jєωs as a race. She has allowed the Jєωs, even in the times when Church and State were closer, to raise their children in Judaism.
See The тαℓмυd Unmasked: The Secret Rabbinical Teachings Concerning Christians by Rev. I. B. Pranaitis (with imprimatur), which discusses the Church's condemnation of the anti-Christian тαℓмυd, which, along with the Torah, are modern Jєωs' two sacred texts.
«St. Thomas Aquinas writes in the Summa Theologica that "it would be licit, according to Tradition, to hold the Jєωs in perpetual servitude for their crime against Our Lord."»
Where exactly are you taking this quotation from? Also, St. Thomas doesn't advocate enslaving Jєωs; he'd rather they convert. For a good opusculum on St. Thomas's views of the Jєωs, see: Epistola ad ducissam Brabantiae.
«The Church had the Good Friday prayer that addressed "the perfidious Jєωs." That prayer is no longer said. The Church sanctioned the expelling of Jєωs from many nations. The Church in some places made the Jєωs wear special symbols so that they could be distinguished from gentiles.»
The Jєωs' own laws proscribed this (cf. St. Thomas's Epistola ad ducissam Brabantiae q. 8).
«In the 17-19th centuries you had a series of popes condemning the rising influence of "ʝʊdɛօ-Masonry."»
Yes, like Pope Leo XIII's encyclical against Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ and naturalism, Humanum Genus, or Msgr. Dillon's Grand Orient Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ Unmasked, to which Pope Leo XIII gave his approbation and published himself.
«St. Pius X had a conversation with Theodore Herzl and told him that he can't recognize the proposed state of Israel until the Jєωs recognize the Church and convert. This overtly anti-Jєωιѕн attitude of the Church that existed for 1960-odd years just seemed to vanish after Vatican II, and was replaced with a positive view of the Jєωs. I've even heard senior Churchman refer to тαℓмυdic Jєωs as elder brothers of Catholics. This 360-degree about face on the subject of Jєωs is just one of many radical changes that occurred to the Church in the wake of Vatican II. If the full deposit of the faith was revealed by Jesus, then how can the Church teach contradiction? How can the Church teach one thing about the Jєωs for nearly two millenia, and now practically fawn over them?»
Read Maurice Pinay's Plot Against the Church, which was sent out to all participants of Vatican II as a warning of ʝʊdɛօ-Masonic/Communist hijacking of the council.
Other interesting case studies are E. Michael Jones's "L’affaire Williamson" on the alleged "h0Ɩ0cαųst denier" Bp. Richard Williamson and Jones's masterpiece The Jєωιѕн Revolutionary Spirit and Its Impact on World History (esp. ch. 24 "The Second Vatican Council Begins," which shows the Jєωιѕн role in Vatican II's draft Nostra Ætate).
Topic: Censored answer on "Christianity" StackExchange (Read 267 times)