CathInfo.com

Project much? 

What part of what I wrote was not correct?  You started your praise of Newman not because of any "anti-Modernist" statements he allegedly made but because of his suspended Magisterium theory.

I suppose that Monsignor Fenton was "mentally ill" also, and so was Cardinal Manning.

No, they weren’t flat earth Catharinian pope deposing Feeneyite internal forum reading schismatics.

That unique combo is reserved to you alone.

You're simply vomiting your suspicions as though they were true (as you often do), because that’s what you need them to be for your argument.

Of course, you sin rashly in doing so, but I realize sin takes a back seat for the narcissist.

That I also agree with Newman’s historically factual account of the temporary suspension of the Ecclesia docens is irrelevant to the fact that I also find in him the prototypical antimodernist principles which St. Pius X vindicated, and Brownson later accepted.

Just to be clear about Orestes Brownson's view of Newman, we quote what he said of Newman just one year prior to his death in 1876:

"A friend, in whose judgment we place great confidence, remarks to us that Dr. Newman does not appear to write in a thoroughly Catholic spirit; that even when his doctrine is orthodox, the animus, the spirit, is at least half-Anglican.  Dr. Newman is decidedly an Englishman, with most of the characteristics of Englishmen.  He seems to us to retain an affection for Anglicanism which we do not share...His Catholicity, which we do not doubt is very genuine, is something added to his Anglicanism, not something diverse or essentially different from it.  It is something more than Anglicanism, but not something different in kind.  In fact, we detect no radical change in the habits of his mind effected by his conversion; and his republication of his works written and published when he was still an Anglican, with only very meagre notes, would seem to indicate that in his own judgment none did take place."
  ("Newman's Reply to Gladstone, 1875" Brownson's Collected Works, vol. 13, p. 500)

  This is only one excerpt from Brownson on Newman, but it is very clear that, although some believe that Brownson "patched things up" with Newman in 1864, Brownson, up to the end of his days, held Newman to be suspect of an Anglican spirit.

And I trust Brownson's orthodoxy long before trusting Newman's.  In fact, Brownson defended the Immaculate Conception before its definition in 1854, Papal Infallibility before its definition in 1870, and he did an article on Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus.  As a side note, Brownson defended the Immaculate Conception long before its formal definition, in lieu of the fact that notable theologians failed to defend it.  *Read Brownson's article on the Immaculate Conception. Immaculate Conception