Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: CAMPOS PROFESSION OF FAITH  (Read 1121 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Classiccom

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 768
  • Reputation: +0/-2
  • Gender: Male
CAMPOS PROFESSION OF FAITH
« on: September 09, 2010, 11:50:42 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • CAMPOS PROFESSION OF FAITH

        We believe firmly in all that our Holy Mother, the Catholic, Apostolic and Roman Church, believes and teaches, and in this Faith we wish to live and die, since only in the Church is God honored and salvation found. We believe that Jesus Christ has founded one only Church, the Catholic hierarchical Church, whose chief pastors are the Pope and the Bishops in union with the Pope, and whose aim is to ensure that men of all ages reach the salvation obtained for us by Our Lord Jesus Christ, together with all the benefits that radiate from it, and to promote on earth the Reign of Our Lord (Mt. 28: 19-20). To do this, the Church does not preach a "new doctrine" but, with the aid of the divine Holy Spirit, faithfully explains the Deposit of Faith received from the Apostles and religiously preserved by her (Vatican Council I).

        We profess communion with the See of Peter, in the legitimate successor to which we recognize the primacy and government over the Universal Church, pastors and faithful, and nothing in this world would separate us from the Rock on which Jesus Christ has founded His Church. We believe firmly in papal infallibility as Vatican Council I has defined it. We respect the power of the Holy Father, which is supreme even if not absolute or without limits. It is subordinate to and cannot contradict Sacred Scripture, Traditions and the definitions already proclaimed by the Church in Her constant Magisterium. Moreover this power cannot be arbitrary or despotic, such as to impose unconditional obedience or absolve subjects from personal responsibility. We owe unconditional and unlimited obedience only to God.

        We are Catholic, Apostolic, Roman and shall be so until death, with the grace of God, and no power or authority will drive us from Holy Church. We profess the Catholic Faith in an integral and total manner, as it was always professed and transmitted by the Church, by the Sovereign Pontiff, by Councils, and therefore in loyal and perfect continuity and consistency, without excluding a single article of faith. We reject and anathematize, with the same firmness, all that has been refuted and condemned by Holy Church.

        Together with all the Popes, we condemn Heresy and all that can favor it. We particularly condemn Protestantism, liberalism, spiritism, naturalism, rationalism, and modernism, in all forms and variants whatever, just as the Popes have done. We reject equally, together with the Popes and in the same way they have done, all the consequences of these errors. For these reasons we condemn the present heresy that takes the name of "Progressivism," an improper name besides, since it is nothing but the repetition of the errors long ago condemned by Holy Church. We accept therefore the entire applicability of the words of St. Paul: "Even if we ourselves or an angel from heaven preach to you a gospel different from that which we have preached, let him be anathema". (Gal. 1:8) Thus, the tendencies of whatever sort emanating even from persons in authority, whenever they be contrary to traditional Catholic doctrine as it has always been taught, giving free rein to the errors already condemned by the Popes and by the Councils, demand from our conscience a formal rejection. We affirm in consequence that, whatever contradiction becomes manifest between what is taught today and what Tradition teaches, there is a duty to follow what was always taught by all and in every part of the Church, because only this is truly and properly Catholic. (St. Vincent of Lekins, Comm., Ench. Patr. 2168)

        For all these reasons, and to be consistent with what the Church our Mother has always taught us in Her constant Magisterium, with the Faith of our baptism, of our confirmation, of our first Communion, in order not to be perjurers and contradict what we have always believed-for all these reasons - we reject:

        The New Mass, not because it is invalid, but because it is unfitting to the honor due Christ: whether in Latin or in the vernacular, since "it represents, both as a whole and in its details, a striking departure from the Catholic theology of the Holy Mass as it was formulated in Session XXIII of the Council of Trent" (Letter of Cardinals Ottaviani and Bacci to Paul VI, 5/10/69). In fact the new Order of Mass obscures the expressions intended to underline the Eucharistic dogmas, bringing the Mass close to the Protestant supper and not accentuating the clear profession of the Catholic Faith. The New Moral Theology- subjective, opportunist, contaminated by permissive liberalism, in which little or nothing any longer constitutes a sin.

        The Profanation of the Church by dress always considered immodest, just as by certain kinds of music and instruments already rejected by the Church for her places of worship. The New Theology of modernism that founds the whole Catholic religion on the evolution of the religious instinct of the first Christian Communities. The New Catechisms, purveyors more or less covertly of the modernist errors and not infrequently vehicles of subversive political doctrines.

        The Theology of Liberation, based on a new interpretation of the Gospel, completely opposed to the teachings always held by the Church, and calculated to favor Marxist machinations. The Trend towards Socialism and Communism that manifestly contradicts the whole social doctrine of the Church and scorns the excommunications of Pius XII directed against those who collaborate in any way with communism. The Secularization of the Clergy, causing grave scandal to the faith and the inevitable impoverishment of Christian life. The Conforming to the spirit of the world on the part of the clergy and that faithful in complete opposition to the teaching of our Lord and to the spirit of mortification, teaching and example of Jesus Crucified. The Reform of the Seminaries, carried out in line with these new tendencies. The Obsessive concern for Human Progress that leads to disregard for the specific purpose of the Church which is the salvation of souls.

        The Dilution of true spirituality in a vague religious sentimentalism. The Ecuмenism that makes the Faith grow cold and makes us forget our Catholic identity, seeking to negate the antagonism between light and darkness, between Christ and Belial (cg. II Cor. 6:14-18), and leads to a panchristianity "a most grave error and capable of destroying the foundations of the Catholic Faith at their base" (Encyclical, Mortalium Animos of Pius XI). Religious Liberty, understood in the sense of an equalization of rights between truth and error, giving supremacy to a supposed subjective right of man, to the prejudice of the absolute right of Truth, of Good, of God, and as a consequence laicizing the State, rendered agnostic towards the true Religion. The Horizontalism of the Religion of Man, that concretizes what St. Pius X calls the "Monstrous and detestable iniquity proper to the times in which we are living, through which man substitutes himself for God" (Enc. Supremi Apostolatus). Democratization of The Church by means of a collegial government in opposition to the hierarchical and monarchical constitution given to Her by Our Lord. Laicization of Society, that brings to life once more the cry of the Jєωs at the death of Jesus refusing to accept His social Kingship and not even recognizing in Him the Supreme Legislator of human society.

        Thus, in the name of Faith, with tranquil conscience, we reject all those who introduce the "smoke of Satan" into the Church and apply themselves to her self-destruction (cf. Paul VI, Allo. of 7/12/68).

    WHAT WE ARE FOR

    We love, praise and adopt all the traditional practices, uses and customs of Holy Church that have contributed and do contribute so much to the sanctification of the faithful, among them, for example: Auricular Confession; Esteem for the Contemplative Life that ought to have pre-eminence over the active life; Use of the Cassock and Habit by priests and religious, that marks so well their separation from the spirit of the world and keeps consciences alert to the spirit of Christ; Veneration of Images and relics of the saints; Communion received on the tongue, and kneeling in token of respect and adoration; Penances and Mortifications, internal and external; The Ornamentation and Magnificence of the Churches which contribute so much to the splendor of worship; The Solemnity and Pomp of their Ceremonies, that so impress and move the good people and stimulating their devotion; Latin in the Liturgy, a factor of the unity and universality of the Church, a precious casket befitting the sacredness expressed by the liturgical prayers; Gregorian Chant, which has nourished piety for so many centuries.

    In particular, we wish to profess and spread a deep and burning devotion to the Mother of God, in whose Immaculate Conception, perpetual virginity and universal mediation we believe. We maintain that such practices of devotion, principally the Holy Rosary, have a special efficacy for the sanctification of souls and the triumph of Holy Mother Church. We profess a convinced acceptance and a sincere love of holy priestly celibacy, one of the sources of pastoral zeal that constitutes a firm response to the hedonism in which the neo-pagan society of our day is immersed. Our position is not one of rebellion, nor of disobedience, or contestation, but of fidelity. It is a question of loyalty to the Faith of our baptism, to our legitimate superiors and our brothers of the faithful. We do not judge the conscience of others, since this judgment belongs to God, we only claim the right and exercise the duty of every Catholic. We confront what is taught today with what was always taught; we hold on to what is of the Church and refuse what serves only for Her self-destruction, whoever may promote it knowingly or unknowingly. We are not against progress if it represents an organic development of Revelation; we are against that false "progress" that is not consistent with Tradition but is in discontinuity with it. It is not a matter of indiscriminate attachment to the past, but of clinging to the Faith which does not pass away.

    We believe in the permanence of the doctrine traditionally taught by the Church and in the objective sense of the formulas that express the dogma and truth that Holy Church teaches. We believe that the truths of Faith remain absolutely independent of the ways of thinking and living of men, since Truth comes from God through the Church and Her Tradition and does not arise from the instinct and religious feeling of the people. We have absolute certainty that our position is legitimate, not by virtue of our arguments and ideas, but because we take our stand on that which the Church Herself has taught us and in such a way that we could make our own the words of St. Augustine when he exclaimed that, if what we believe were an error, then God Himself would have deceived us.

    We have firm hope that within a short time the Church will have overcome the current crisis she is living through, and, dissipating the darkness of heresy will return to shine out as always, as a glorious beacon to the nations: "The gates of hell shall not prevail against it" (Matt. 16:18).

    Campos, Easter 1982 - 25 signatures appended; 5 monsignori, 20 priests

    ==================================
    Could somebody please frame this one in Gold.

    "there is a duty to follow what was always taught by all and in every part of the Church, because only this is truly and properly Catholic"

    St. Vincent of Lekins

     approved September 9, 2020  - Classiccom (that is if we can verify if there really was a St. Vincent of Lekins)



    Offline ServusSpiritusSancti

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 8212
    • Reputation: +7173/-7
    • Gender: Male
    CAMPOS PROFESSION OF FAITH
    « Reply #1 on: September 09, 2010, 12:47:17 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • What's the point of this?
    Please ignore ALL of my posts. I was naive during my time posting on this forum and didn’t know any better. I retract and deeply regret any and all uncharitable or erroneous statements I ever made here.


    Offline Belloc

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6600
    • Reputation: +615/-5
    • Gender: Male
    CAMPOS PROFESSION OF FAITH
    « Reply #2 on: September 09, 2010, 01:15:01 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • no purpose, just another long winded rant and apparently, he is not willing to own up to being a Old Catholic still.....whatever.... :tv-disturbed:
    Proud "European American" and prouder, still, Catholic

    Offline Classiccom

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 768
    • Reputation: +0/-2
    • Gender: Male
    CAMPOS PROFESSION OF FAITH
    « Reply #3 on: September 09, 2010, 04:33:53 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Belloc
    no purpose, just another long winded rant and apparently, he is not willing to own up to being a Old Catholic still.....whatever.... :tv-disturbed:


    =============================

      I get a lot of flak around here, but do they have a profession of faith ? Who is their earthly spiritual leader ?  

      I really admire the crew they had at Campos. Maybe that is why I have so much friction here. You just cut down anybody trying to make an escape from the hell created by Pope Benedict and his spiritual alliance of the darkside. I think we all agree that something has gone drastically wrong, but I am an outsider because I believe this disconnect occurred a lot longer ago than 1962.

      This is the kind of thing that should be prepared before some big EMP event or even worse. Are all the big guns of Catholicism asleep or dead ?

     

    Offline OHCA

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2833
    • Reputation: +1866/-111
    • Gender: Male
    CAMPOS PROFESSION OF FAITH
    « Reply #4 on: September 09, 2010, 06:44:57 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Classiccom
    =============================

      I get a lot of flak around here, but do they have a profession of faith ? Who is their earthly spiritual leader ?  

      I really admire the crew they had at Campos. Maybe that is why I have so much friction here. You just cut down anybody trying to make an escape from the hell created by Pope Benedict and his spiritual alliance of the darkside. I think we all agree that something has gone drastically wrong, but I am an outsider because I believe this disconnect occurred a lot longer ago than 1962.

      This is the kind of thing that should be prepared before some big EMP event or even worse. Are all the big guns of Catholicism asleep or dead ?

     


    Classiccom,

    I would like an opportunity to respond to your question, "Who is their earthly spiritual leader ?"

    That for me is our current Pope Benedict XVI--that is, I endeavor to be faithful to the Holy See in matters of necessity.

    I am not SSPX and do not assume to be speaking for them, but as best I can tell, that is there position as well.  Myself, numerous other "Motu" Catholics, SSPX (if I am correct), and probably some other traditional Catholics will tell you that is our "earthly spiritual leader."

    We are to varying degrees pleased or displeased with that, but recognize that our displeasure does not change the fact; I'm not pleased with the current U.S. President, but I cannot rationally say he is not the President.

    But in matters not necessary to faith, dogma, etc., such other matters being of grave concern to us (abandoning the universal language of the Universal Church; replacing the beautiful Mass of All Time with a bastardized version; abandoning fast and abstinence rules we believe play a critical role in maintaining the discipline needed to live a Catholic life (especially today); the practices which we believe diminish respect for, if not outright abuse, the Real Presence; etc.), we, out of conscience, opt not to avail ourselves to the liberties (reckless liberties in the view of traditional Catholics) which the Holy See has granted.

    I believe the Papacy of the Roman Catholic Church is the manifestation of the Lord's words in in Matthew 16:18 and 19 and Matthew 28:20.  There are some on here who hold the necessities, dogma, etc. of the true Faith, but who, in good-faith, do not agree that Pope Benedict XVI is the manifestation of the Lord's words in Matthew 16:18 and 19 and Matthew 28:20.

    However, it appears to me that they do not believe we are left hencforth until the consummation of the world without a manifestation thereof.  They either believe that the manifestation exists but is currently not known to most, or that the full manifestation will be absent for a time (vacant).  However, I perceive that the people thusly described have not despaired of the Scriptures to which I have cited, have not despaired of the reality of the Apostolic chain and that it continues or is only temporarily vacant, but rather hold a position based on faith and hope, and have utmost concern and care for the Apostolic chain and are trembling and struggling and fervently praying given their perspective of the state of the Apostolic chain.

    I mean no disrespect to the position I have just described and I apologize if I have unintentionally misrepresented or disrespected any position held that a Catholic, true to the core of the Church, may in good faith hold regarding our circuмstance.

    My point in all of this is that the Apostolic chain is important to ALL Catholics!  Your asking this question, Classiccom, "Who is their earthly spiritual leader ?" gives me hope that it is important to you, as well, though I have inferred otherwise in several of your previous posts.

    Now that I have expressed who my earthly spiritual leader is, and have presumed to assert the position of others regarding the Apostolic chain (I beg for charitable correction from them if I am wrong rather than harsh rebuke, as what I have said has been in good-faith and for the purpose of demonstrating that the Apostolic chain, regardless of one's view of the current state of it, is very serious and gravely important to ALL who legitimately profess to be Catholic), please, Classiccom, indulge me and tell me who your earthly spritiual leader is (of course, moving over to the Crisis forum to do so, if necessary to remain in compliance with the rules of the forum).


    Offline Belloc

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6600
    • Reputation: +615/-5
    • Gender: Male
    CAMPOS PROFESSION OF FAITH
    « Reply #5 on: September 10, 2010, 07:19:46 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: OHCA
    please, Classiccom, indulge me and tell me who your earthly spritiual leader is (of course, moving over to the Crisis forum to do so, if necessary to remain in compliance with the rules of the forum).


    well stated-so, ClassiFallible, who is your earthly spiritual leader?
    Proud "European American" and prouder, still, Catholic

    Offline Classiccom

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 768
    • Reputation: +0/-2
    • Gender: Male
    CAMPOS PROFESSION OF FAITH
    « Reply #6 on: September 14, 2010, 05:18:20 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  •   Looks like another spelling mistake.

    St. Vincent of Lerins

    Feastday: May 14
    445

    Monk and writer. Born to a noble family of Gaul (modern France), he was probably the brother of St. Lupus of Troyes. Vincent initially served as a soldier but gave it up to become a monk on the island of Lerins off the southern French coast near Cannes. He was ordained there and in about 434 authored his famous work the Commonitorium. Written under the pseudonym Peregrinus the Commonitorium offered a guide to orthodox teaching and included his famous maxim, the Vincentian Canon, by which he hoped to be able to differentiate between true and false tradition: quod ubique, quod semper, quod ab omnibus credituni est ("what has been believed everywhere, always, and by all").

    He believed that the ultimate source of Christian truth was Holy Scripture and that the authority of the Church was to be invoked to guarantee the correct interpretation of Scripture.

     A proponent of Semi-Pelagianism, he op-posed the Augustinian model of Grace and was probably the recipient of Prosper of Aquitaine's Responsiones ad Capitula Objectionum Vincentianarum.

    http://www.catholic.org/saints/saint.php?saint_id=2006

    ==============

      This Saint is recognized by both Roman and Orthodox Catholic Church.

    http://www.stvincentchurch.org/St_Vincent_of_Lerins/Home.html



    Offline Classiccom

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 768
    • Reputation: +0/-2
    • Gender: Male
    CAMPOS PROFESSION OF FAITH
    « Reply #7 on: September 15, 2010, 04:47:50 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • http://www.ancient-future.net/vcanon.html

    The Vincentian Canon of St. Vincent of Lerins
    From Chapter 4 of The Commonitory (aka The Commitorium), AD 434

    [ed. Moxon, Cambridge Patristic Texts] *
       

    (1) I have continually given the greatest pains and diligence to inquiring, from the greatest possible number of men outstanding in holiness and in doctrine, how I can secure a kind of fixed and, as it were, general and guiding principle for distinguishing the true Catholic Faith from the degraded falsehoods of heresy. And the answer that I receive is always to this effect; that if I wish, or indeed if anyone wishes, to detect the deceits of heretics that arise and to avoid their snares and to keep healthy and sound in a healthy faith, we ought, with the Lord's help, to fortify our faith in a twofold manner, firstly, that is, by the authority of God's Law, then by the tradition of the Catholic Church.

    (2) Here, it may be, someone will ask, Since the canon of Scripture is complete, and is in itself abundantly sufficient, what need is there to join to it the interpretation of the Church? The answer is that because of the very depth of Scripture all men do not place one identical interpretation upon it. The statements of the same writer are explained by different men in different ways, so much so that it seems almost possible to extract from it as many opinions as there are men. Novatian expounds in one way, Sabellius in another, Donatus in another, Arius, Eunomius and Macedonius in another, Photinus, Apollinaris and Priscillian in another, Jovinian, Pelagius and Caelestius in another, and latterly Nestorius in another. Therefore, because of the intricacies of error, which is so multiform, there is great need for the laying down of a rule for the exposition of Prophets and Apostles in accordance with the standard of the interpretation of the Church Catholic.

    (3) Now in the Catholic Church itself we take the greatest care to hold that which has been believed everywhere, always and by all. That is truly and properly 'Catholic,' as is shown by the very force and meaning of the word, which comprehends everything almost universally. We shall hold to this rule if we follow universality [i.e. oecuмenicity], antiquity, and consent. We shall follow universality if we acknowledge that one Faith to be true which the whole Church throughout the world confesses; antiquity if we in no wise depart from those interpretations which it is clear that our ancestors and fathers proclaimed; consent, if in antiquity itself we keep following the definitions and opinions of all, or certainly nearly all, bishops and doctors alike.

    (4) What then will the Catholic Christian do, if a small part of the Church has cut itself off from the communion of the universal Faith? The answer is sure. He will prefer the healthiness of the whole body to the morbid and corrupt limb. But what if some novel contagion try to infect the whole Church, and not merely a tiny part of it? Then he will take care to cleave to antiquity, which cannot now be led astray by any deceit of novelty. What if in antiquity itself two or three men, or it may be a city, or even a whole province be detected in error? Then he will take the greatest care to prefer the decrees of the ancient General Councils, if there are such, to the irresponsible ignorance of a few men. But what if some error arises regarding which nothing of this sort is to be found? Then he must do his best to compare the opinions of the Fathers and inquire their meaning, provided always that, though they belonged to diverse times and places, they yet continued in the faith and communion of the one Catholic Church; and let them be teachers approved and outstanding. And whatever he shall find to have been held, approved and taught, not by one or two only but by all equally and with one consent, openly, frequently, and persistently, let him take this as to be held by him without the slightest hesitation.

    Translation taken from Internet Ancient History Sourcebook. These docuмents were compiled by Paul Halsall. Also, check out a complete version of St. Vincent's Commonitory.

    ====================================

    Electric Light Orchestra - Hold on Tight



    ========================

    http://logismoitouaaron.blogspot.com/2009/06/quod-ubique-quod-semper-quod-ab.html