I think that's missing the point. It's like when people say: "It's your choice to get the vaccine. But if you don't you're fired."
I understand where you want to go with this, but my analogy was on point. The comment I replied to inferred that the U.S. was treating the Brazilian President badly, and I wrote that he had choices that most of us wouldn't.
If I were in NYC for a day and couldn't enter a public dinning room for whatever reason, standing on the sidewalk eating a slice of pizza or a hotdog without knife and fork would likely be my main options, but ones I utilize in real life anyways, and I don't use a knife and fork for pizza or hotdogs. Many cities have sidewalk fruit vendors or open air markets to expand my menu options. I WOULD NOT have access to an elegant consultant or embassy residence (most likely with an executive chef on staff) nor could I afford to take a suite at a Manhattan hotel and have a filet mignon (unless it was a day of abstinence and I would have to order lobster or crab) sent to my private quarters by room service, thus avoiding entry into a public dinning room.
As I said, President Bolsonaro has options that aren't available to we mere mortals and those options sound a lot more attractive than "getting fired". That was my point! Besides which, maybe grabbing a slice of pizza on the street (to be eaten by hand as most men would) is what he wanted to do.