CathInfo.com

.

So there are at least two categories of inquiry that can be used to uncover the falsehood and subterfuge that was the "official version" of 9-11.

1 - There is objective, scientific examination of the physical characteristics of the WTC buildings themselves, #'s 1, 2 and 7, how they were damaged and why they collapsed:  if WTC1 and WTC2 collapsed due to fire caused by "planes" crashing into them (which can be shown to be impossible on 2 levels of examination), then why did WTC7 collapse, which was not struck by any plane at all?  And why did it come down on its own footprint with free-fall acceleration (which can only happen in steel framed buildings when they are deliberately demolished with explosives)?

2 - There is critical analysis of the media reporting of that day's events, the video footage that was broadcast at the time, and the video images that were published later, both by industry journalists and by amateur photographers.  

Regarding both categories, no serious investigation has ever taken place, but instead it has been entirely left up to private parties and grass-roots efforts to get to the truth of what happened on Sept. 11th, 2001.

This is an interesting contribution, obscurus:

One of the best docuмentaries analyzing the events of 9-11 I have seen are September Clues and the Addendum. The conclusions may seem astonishing. Nevertheless, the creator of this doc analyzes with a fine-tooth comb the audio and visual images broadcast by the media and concludes that no planes actually hit the Towers nor the Pentagon. He concludes that they were missiles, which I think changes the narrative a bit.-

At 16:20 in the first video linked (I've embedded them below for convenience of readers), Mike Walter of CNN tries to explain away why the damage to the exterior wall of the Pentagon shows no impact of the two jet engines that would have hit the wall, some 30 feet away on each side of the center hole.  He says he saw the wings "fold back" against the fuselage "because they weren't strong enough to withstand the impact," and that's why there's only one big hole in the wall.  That's at 18:00+, while a clip of the "plane" hitting the South Tower is shown and the wings do not "fold back".

Any engineer can tell you that if the wings were not strong enough to withstand the impact, they would have simply crashed into the side of the Pentagon, because at 500 miles an hour, there isn't time for the wings to change direction and start to "fold back" against the fuselage.  Walter is trying to twist the theory to fit the observed reality of only one hole in the wall and no impact damage from the two engines, nor any engine parts at the scene.

The only way to get through the thickly insulated perception of most American believers of the MSM version of 9-11 is to have a long list of questions which you can CALMLY and SOFTLY ask, selecting from the most appropriate ones depending on the listener's evident topic of interest.  

You can't be excited, and you can't be LOUD, or they won't listen to what you say.  That's what Liberalism has done to us.  Anyone who is passionate about their message is broad-brushed a "fanatic."

-Watch it for yourself:

September Clues:
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/embed/GIfMw7mEDNk[/youtube]

September Clues Addendum:
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/embed/vD_IgCKpNrY[/youtube]

September Clues Website:
http://septemberclues.info/

Quote

The News Media had a central role in pulling off the 9/11 psy-op. The operation involved airing on television a substitute, computer-generated version of reality. It has temporarily succeeded to sell to the world the preposterous tale of 19 young terrorists using hijacked airliners to attack the USA. This longstanding research has established the falseness of the images shown on LIVE TV on 9/11 – as well as all the subsequently released video material. A large number of casualties was also reported to generate public outrage and support for illegal wars of aggression. However, the September Clues research has determined that the alleged victims were fictitious identities mostly/or entirely created within the digital realm. The 9/11 hoax - and the phony "War on Terror" - are definitively exposed by method revealed.

The first video above ends with recalling that one of the 4 missing planes was supposed to be headed for Los Angeles, so they go to LAX and find no families showing up to meet their anticipated loved ones (there could normally have been up to several hundred potential greeters at LAX), and instead the airport was being shut down and evacuated, but no reason was given for WHY evacuate the airport.  Was there some security threat?  No answer.  

How many airports across the country were being evacuated for security reasons?  They don't say.  Perhaps there were none.  All air traffic was suspended, and planes were called in to land wherever they were.  But that doesn't entail evacuating the airports.

Maybe they were evacuating LAX to obscure the fact that nobody was showing up to meet their family members who were scheduled to be arriving from the east coast.  No such family members were being interviewed by the news-hungry media (which normally would have been ALL OVER getting their stories out for all to see).  No passenger manifest was ever published with the names of passengers who were missing, and should have been on the 'missing plane'.  Nobody in Los Angeles ever came forward with a sad story of how their friend or loved one never came home that day.  Why would we not conclude that there never was any list of passengers because there never were any passengers?

.