Author Topic: Ban the Christains in America (Read 1063 times)

poche · « **on:** July 27, 2013, 04:31:55 AM »

The San Antonio City Council is proposing an updated non-discrimination policy that effectively bans any city council member from being elected if he or she has ever “demonstrated a bias.”

“No person shall be appointed to a position if the city council finds that such person has, prior to such proposed appointment, engaged in discrimination or demonstrated a bias, by word or deed, against any person, group or organization on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin, sex, sɛҳuąƖ orientation, gender identity, veteran status, age, or disability,” the ordinance reads.

According to Pastor Charles Flowers of Faith Outreach International, the amended ordinance includes two new categories to the policy: sɛҳuąƖ orientation and gender identity. Judging by the vague language of the draft, the ordinance could effectively ban Christians, many of whom believe ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity is a sin, from serving on the city council if they have expressed that belief publicly.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/jul/24/san-antonio-proposal-could-set-stage-barring-chris/#.UfB0Ub6AW9M.facebook

Viva Cristo Rey · « **Reply #1 on:** July 27, 2013, 08:28:32 AM »

Didn't dc pass bill to limit protesting?

RomanCatholic1953 · « **Reply #2 on:** July 27, 2013, 09:23:05 AM »

Shows how far radical liberalism, and cultural Marxism has advanced
in society.
This is what the professors are teaching in the schools, colleges, and
universities.

songbird · « **Reply #3 on:** July 27, 2013, 06:32:21 PM »

I guess one could vote for their dog or monkey!

Frances · « **Reply #4 on:** July 27, 2013, 06:39:16 PM »

In Canada, a pastor can be arrested for "hate-speech" for preaching against ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity or in favor of limiting marriage to between one man-one woman. Coming soon to all of USA by Constitutional amendment. Many states already have laws.

Jehanne · « **Reply #5 on:** August 04, 2013, 07:28:11 AM »

You mean to say that if I would say (which I have) that a Catholic prince of a Catholic kingdom had the moral obligation, right and duty to punish ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ acts and other violations of divine and natural law, even with public immolation, if such, in the Sovereign's judgment, served the "common good," that I am guilty of hate speech?

songbird · « **Reply #6 on:** August 04, 2013, 03:13:41 PM »

If you notice, it is the dispensing of Gods laws. If they do that, they gag the Christians, make them criminals. All New Order churches do not need a law to make them marry ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs. The New Order is operated by the federal gov't and some know of Churches in other countries owned by the state as they say. New Order does just that, serve the agenda of the federal gov't, gives them money to get grants and such. So, the Churches are owned by the federal gov't. as long as the charities give to abortion and all the other ugly immorals. I am surprised that it has not happened sooner.