Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: 2024 article on the principles of voting  (Read 9255 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Quo vadis Domine

  • Supporter
Re: 2024 article on the principles of voting
« Reply #10 on: August 25, 2024, 04:04:53 PM »
This article is 100% garbage.  This same guy would go on to accept Vatican II.  Because a single joker prior to Vatican II shamefully endorsed "lesser evil" (a scandal and a disgrace), idiot Trads who want to convince themselves it's OK to vote for Trump based on the deplorable priniciple of "lesser evil" will blithely engage in mortal sin, and continue to promote it.  At no point in this joker's "doctoral dissertation" did he actually explain or defend the principle, but merely stated it gatuitously.

I swear I've not seen a bigger bunch of morons than the sedevacantists who think that if they can find something written in the 1950s and before then it's correct.

You're also idiots if you think that your votes count, that all viable/major candidates are not under their control, and that the winner has not already been selected for you.  So you proceed to compromise Catholic moral principles for nothing.

:facepalm:

Are you ever not rude? The principle is called double effect and one can use it in the case of this election.

Re: 2024 article on the principles of voting
« Reply #11 on: August 25, 2024, 05:25:46 PM »
This article is 100% garbage.  This same guy would go on to accept Vatican II.  Because a single joker prior to Vatican II shamefully endorsed "lesser evil" (a scandal and a disgrace), idiot Trads who want to convince themselves it's OK to vote for Trump based on the deplorable priniciple of "lesser evil" will blithely engage in mortal sin, and continue to promote it.  At no point in this joker's "doctoral dissertation" did he actually explain or defend the principle, but merely stated it gatuitously.

I swear I've not seen a bigger bunch of morons than the sedevacantists who think that if they can find something written in the 1950s and before then it's correct.

You're also idiots if you think that your votes count, that all viable/major candidates are not under their control, and that the winner has not already been selected for you.  So you proceed to compromise Catholic moral principles for nothing.

:facepalm:
Still here, eh?

Instead of your usual name-calling, how about providing Church teaching that clearly refutes the "joker" pre-V2 theologian and clearly states that it would be a mortal sin to vote for a candidate such as Trump?

And if you can't do that, then you should stop assigning mortal sin to your fellow Catholics.


Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: 2024 article on the principles of voting
« Reply #12 on: August 25, 2024, 05:28:48 PM »
Then there’s this:

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/rcna168084

Yep.  I never thought I'd see the day where "Trads" are justfying voting for a pro-abortion and pro-sodomite candidate.  Shows how the feeble-minded and weak-faithed have been manipulated by the Hegelian dialetic.  As Our Lord asked, will there be any faith at all left in the world when He returns?



At least SSPX got this right, having pointed out that ...
Quote
Consequently, it would be manifestly immoral and sinful to vote for a candidate who ... is pro-abortion, pro-gαy, or pro-euthanasia.

Offline Quo vadis Domine

  • Supporter
Re: 2024 article on the principles of voting
« Reply #13 on: August 25, 2024, 05:47:52 PM »
Yep.  I never thought I'd see the day where "Trads" are justfying voting for a pro-abortion and pro-sodomite candidate.  Shows how the feeble-minded and weak-faithed have been manipulated by the Hegelian dialetic.  As Our Lord asked, will there be any faith at all left in the world when He returns?



At least SSPX got this right, having pointed out that ...


So whats your excuse for voting for him in the past? He WAS pro abortion and pro homo back then too. Please justify your position back in 2016 and I believe you voted for him in 2020 too.

Re: 2024 article on the principles of voting
« Reply #14 on: August 25, 2024, 06:25:48 PM »
This article is 100% garbage.  This same guy would go on to accept Vatican II.  Because a single joker prior to Vatican II shamefully endorsed "lesser evil" (a scandal and a disgrace), idiot Trads who want to convince themselves it's OK to vote for Trump based on the deplorable priniciple of "lesser evil" will blithely engage in mortal sin, and continue to promote it.  At no point in this joker's "doctoral dissertation" did he actually explain or defend the principle, but merely stated it gatuitously.

I swear I've not seen a bigger bunch of morons than the sedevacantists who think that if they can find something written in the 1950s and before then it's correct.

You're also idiots if you think that your votes count, that all viable/major candidates are not under their control, and that the winner has not already been selected for you.  So you proceed to compromise Catholic moral principles for nothing.

:facepalm:
This article is 100% garbage.  This same guy would go on to accept Vatican II.  Because a single joker prior to Vatican II shamefully endorsed "lesser evil" (a scandal and a disgrace), idiot Trads who want to convince themselves it's OK to vote for Trump based on the deplorable priniciple of "lesser evil" will blithely engage in mortal sin, and continue to promote it.  At no point in this joker's "doctoral dissertation" did he actually explain or defend the principle, but merely stated it gatuitously.

I swear I've not seen a bigger bunch of morons than the sedevacantists who think that if they can find something written in the 1950s and before then it's correct.

You're also idiots if you think that your votes count, that all viable/major candidates are not under their control, and that the winner has not already been selected for you.  So you proceed to compromise Catholic moral principles for nothing.

:facepalm:


Yes, son. I see. One not need be detective to tell man have something wrong inside.