Catholic Info

Traditional Catholic Faith => Fighting Errors in the Modern World => Topic started by: Last Tradhican on April 25, 2018, 10:35:11 AM

Title: αnтι-ѕємιтє
Post by: Last Tradhican on April 25, 2018, 10:35:11 AM
Using the expression αnтι-ѕємιтє never made sense to me, since almost all Jєωs are not Semites, and the Palestinians are, thus the most anti-Semitic peoples are the Jєωs themselves. What's with that?

It should be anti-Jєωιѕн or anti-ѕуηαgσgυє of Satan since the average Jєω in the street is just trying to make a living.
Title: Re: αnтι-ѕємιтє
Post by: PG on April 25, 2018, 11:05:27 AM
Using the expression αnтι-ѕємιтє never made sense to me, since almost all Jєωs are not Semites, and the Palestinians are, thus the most anti-Semitic peoples are the Jєωs themselves. What's with that?

It should be anti-Jєωιѕн or anti-ѕуηαgσgυє of Satan since the average Jєω in the street is just trying to make a living.
I started a thread about this a couple of years ago.  And, I decided that I would say "anti rabbi" instead.  Because, orthodox judaism is to reformed judaism as catholic tradition as tradition is to the novus ordo.  They are the real players, and there the rabbis run the who.  Reformed judaism is really subservient to orthodoxy judaism.  It is in orthodox judaism where the rabbis are revered like gods.  In reformed judaism, the rabbi is more like the presider over the group similar to the novus ordo priest.  Reformed judaism is really a feminist movement, and that can be attacked separately.  When the rabbi is neutralized, it is the beginning of the end for those those Jєωs under them, because they will no longer see the need to partake of the rituals, which is the source of their problems.  And, they will then give up judaism.  And, anti rabbi rhymes, it has a nice ring to it.  
Title: Re: αnтι-ѕємιтє
Post by: Geremia on April 25, 2018, 11:08:48 AM
All Catholics must be anti-Judaism.
Title: Re: αnтι-ѕємιтє
Post by: rum on April 25, 2018, 11:26:31 AM
Pope Piux XI's line "Spiritually, we are Semites" is often used by Jєωs and their lackeys to defend Jєωs. But it could just as easily, and more accurately, be used against Jєωs. Since the Church is the New Israel, and God broke his covenant with those Jєωs who would go on to develop the тαℓмυd, to be a spiritual semite is to be semitic in a meaningful sense. Since Jєωs, at best, are merely semitic in the flesh but not in the spirit, prejudice towards spiritually semitic people is beyond the pale. Whereas those who worship the semitism of the flesh would fall foul of the Church's teachings against racial idolatry. Therefore prejudice towards Jєωs is morally legitimate.
Title: Re: αnтι-ѕємιтє
Post by: hollingsworth on April 25, 2018, 03:22:02 PM
rum:
Quote
Therefore prejudice towards Jєωs is morally legitimate.

St. John Crysostom certainly thought so.  Read his Adversos ʝʊdɛօs sermons.  In fact, prejudice towards the Jєωs doesn't quite reflect his position, imo.  I would say, having read these sermons several times over, that hatred of the Jєωs would far more accurately describe his sentiment.
Title: Re: αnтι-ѕємιтє
Post by: Jaynek on April 25, 2018, 03:22:23 PM
Using the expression αnтι-ѕємιтє never made sense to me, since almost all Jєωs are not Semites, and the Palestinians are, thus the most anti-Semitic peoples are the Jєωs themselves. What's with that?
The term was coined for the purpose of social and political manipulation, so it is not surprising that it does not make sense. It is meant to appeal to emotions rather than logic.   Ever since I learned about the origin of the word I have tried to avoid using it. 
Title: Re: αnтι-ѕємιтє
Post by: Last Tradhican on April 25, 2018, 04:20:00 PM
Since Jєωs, at best, are merely semitic in the flesh but not in the spirit...
There are only about 14 million Jєωs in the world, and the vast majority of them are not Semites, I'd say 80% of them are not Semites.
Title: Re: αnтι-ѕємιтє
Post by: klasG4e on April 25, 2018, 04:26:28 PM
The term was coined for the purpose of social and political manipulation, so it is not surprising that it does not make sense. It is meant to appeal to emotions rather than logic.   Ever since I learned about the origin of the word I have tried to avoid using it.

Thanks for that!  There is much wisdom/truth in your very succinct statement.

The term αnтι-ѕємιтє, for better or for worse, is, of course, so closely associated in its common usage with Judaism.  Ah, Judaism!  I don't think I know of any subject under the sun which lends itself to so much confusion, perplexity, and ignorance, not to mention diabolical horror. 

Wrapping your head around rocket science or a lot of other things would in many ways be a walk in the park compared to trying to figure out the multi  layers and varied aspects of Judaism.  (The "rabbit holes" seem endless and they have over the centuries been purposely set there.)  I remember reading the outstanding 1102 page book Judaism Discovered: A Study of the Anti-Biblical Religion of Racism, Self-Worship, Superstition and Deceit by Michael Hoffman, an author who I disagree with on some things, but definitely not with this his Magnum Opus.  I really saw the world in a different way after reading it.  I have consulted it a number of times since.
Title: Re: αnтι-ѕємιтє
Post by: rum on April 25, 2018, 04:34:24 PM
rum:
St. John Crysostom certainly thought so.  Read his Adversos ʝʊdɛօs sermons.  In fact, prejudice towards the Jєωs doesn't quite reflect his position, imo.  I would say, having read these sermons several times over, that hatred of the Jєωs would far more accurately describe his sentiment.
Yes it's clear from reading some of the Fathers and Doctors that hatred of Jєωs isn't a sin.
Title: Re: αnтι-ѕємιтє
Post by: rum on April 25, 2018, 04:35:29 PM
There are only about 14 million Jєωs in the world, and the vast majority of them are not Semites, I'd say 80% of them are not Semites.
Sure, assuming the Khazar theory is true, which I suspect it is. If we define a Jєω as "one who privately, but not necessarily publically, identifies as a Jєω" I'd guesstimate that 100 million is a closer tally.

Jєωs who publically identify as Jєωs function in concert with cryptos. In fact without crypto-Jєωs I doubt the Jєωιѕн people would have much influence in the world. Barack Obama didn't identify himself as Jєωιѕн on any census, but he identifies as a Jєω and works in concert with public Jєωs. Cryptos are legion. There may be one on this very thread.

Title: Re: αnтι-ѕємιтє
Post by: Jaynek on April 25, 2018, 04:41:33 PM
Yes it's clear from reading some of the Fathers and Doctors that hatred of Jєωs isn't a sin.
It would depend on just what one meant by "hatred of Jєωs."  Obviously there is a sense in which rum's assertion is true, but "hatred" is a vague enough term (as is "Jєω") that I suspect that it could refer to a sin.
Title: Re: αnтι-ѕємιтє
Post by: Croix de Fer on April 25, 2018, 04:49:00 PM
Catholics shouldn't fear being called "antisemitic".(1) They should be proud of it because it really means opposing Antichrist. It's Jєωs who are the officers of designing and leading the Antichrist system that paves his emergence.

Oppose the Jєω, and you oppose Antichrist who will also be a Jєω.


1. At the same time, Catholics should be prudent about how they oppose the Jєω and his lackeys. Do your best to remain anonymous online. In real life, don't shave your head like idiots. Be a "grey man" in real life and oppose the Jєω using asymmetrical means - spiritually...psychologically... physically...in the information war... at work...how you spend your money...your business dealings...etc.  Use direct, overt means only when justifiable and necessary.
Title: Re: αnтι-ѕємιтє
Post by: Matthew on April 25, 2018, 10:14:45 PM
The Jєωs believe it's a virtue to move X dollars from the possession of a goy into Jєωιѕн hands -- morality is not an issue for them. Their goal is to physically own the world and everything and everyone in it, under the satanic rule of the Antichrist.

The best way to beat the Jєω today is avoid paying interest. That is how they force the wife into the workforce, limit your options (no homeschooling if you can't afford it, or if your wife can't stay home, etc.)

I am extremely thankful for my old catechism teacher, Thomas A. Nelson, who taught me the truth about the money system, the Jєωs, etc. and I decided as a teenager I would minimize paying interest, as a way of being clever and outwitting them.

Most people have FOUR DIFFERENT VECTORS of debt and interest/usury by which they transfer money and wealth from the goyim (us, the "cattle") to the Jєωιѕн bankers.
* Mortgage (death lock in French)
* Car payment(s), plus additional money wasted on full coverage insurance, which is mandatory if the bank has a lien on your car
* Student loans -- this is a big one, much larger in the past 10 years. Google it.
* Credit cards

If you add up all the interest, that's probably what your wife earns at her $25,000 a year job. Some women go full-career and are often better equipped to earn money than their husbands, but there are still plenty who go to work even if it means earning $8-$15 an hour. After you subtract child care, a full wardrobe, a 2nd car (plus gas, maintenance, insurance), eating out every day, and lost tax credits/benefits there's not much money left over. Plus when both parents work, you're going to blow that much more money on "time savers" to make up for your collective lack of free time. If your wife was home, she could take care of many things cheaper (do it yourself, comparison shopping, couponing, etc.), and basically help you save money (which helps the bottom line sometimes MORE than getting a 2nd job).

So few people are good with money these days.
Title: Re: αnтι-ѕємιтє
Post by: klasG4e on April 26, 2018, 02:15:22 PM


I am extremely thankful for my old catechism teacher, Thomas A. Nelson, who taught me the truth about the money system, the Jєωs, etc. and I decided as a teenager I would minimize paying interest, as a way of being clever and outwitting them.



In my opinion Mr. Nelson is one of the very greatest (albeit, mostly unsung) Catholic heroes the United States of America has ever had as one of its very own.

One can only imagine how many souls the solid Catholic books he printed up and sold (and in many cases gave away for free or for cost only) via TAN has helped to save and will help to save in so many different ways -- directly and indirectly.

I recall that TAN used to have a program under Mr. Nelson whereby a seminarian could get $500 worth of books from Tan of his own choosing for free -- just for the asking.
Title: Re: αnтι-ѕємιтє
Post by: Matthew on April 26, 2018, 02:20:28 PM
In my opinion Mr. Nelson is one of the very greatest (albeit, mostly unsung) Catholic heroes the United States of America has ever had as one of its very own.

One can only imagine how many souls the solid Catholic books he printed up and sold (and in many cases gave away for free or for cost only) via TAN has helped to save and will help to save in so many different ways -- directly and indirectly.

I recall that TAN used to have a program under Mr. Nelson whereby a seminarian could get $500 worth of books from Tan of his own choosing for free -- just for the asking.
Yes, I was one of the recipients of that free books program. Those books made a big change in my life, and in how seriously I treated my time at the seminary. TAN also made a big donation of books to the STAS seminary library in Winona, MN.
Title: Re: αnтι-ѕємιтє
Post by: hollingsworth on April 26, 2018, 04:31:05 PM
jaynek:
Quote
The term was coined for the purpose of social and political manipulation, so it is not surprising that it does not make sense. It is meant to appeal to emotions rather than logic.   Ever since I learned about the origin of the word I have tried to avoid using it.
Exactly right.  And, alas, the term has caught on and become wildly successful.  We waste our time pointing out that 90-95% of Jєωry is αѕнкenαzιk, that the vast majority came from an eastern European race which worshipped the phallus.  It makes no difference that these people have scarcely any truly Semitic ancestory, that they are no more related to the offspring of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob than your average Eskimo, that they have about as much right to Palestine as the Chinese.  It doesn't matter.  They have managed to buffalo mankind into believing that they are somehow related to the ancient inheritors of the Land, even though many of us know, and they know, that they're not.  The term 'antisemitic' works for them.  They're not about to give it up, since it always resonates sympathetically in the benighted hearts of the unwashed gentile masses after generations of usage.
Title: Re: αnтι-ѕємιтє
Post by: Matthew on April 26, 2018, 05:55:18 PM
alas, the term has caught on and become wildly successful.  We waste our time pointing out that 90-95% of Jєωry is αѕнкenαzιk, that the vast majority came from an eastern European race which worshiped the phallus.  It makes no difference that these people have scarcely any truly Semitic ancestry, that they are no more related to the offspring of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob than your average Eskimo, that they have about as much right to Palestine as the Chinese.  It doesn't matter.  They have managed to buffalo mankind into believing that they are somehow related to the ancient inheritors of the Land, even though many of us know, and they know, that they're not.  The term 'antisemitic' works for them.  They're not about to give it up, since it always resonates sympathetically in the benighted hearts of the unwashed gentile masses after generations of usage.
Exactly.
Title: Re: αnтι-ѕємιтє
Post by: rum on April 26, 2018, 09:12:24 PM
Even if everyone today who identifies as a Jєω does have semitic lineage, it still wouldn't be wrong to be prejudiced toward them. The moral rightness of prejudice toward Jєωs doesn't hinge on whether or not they constitute a racial group. If they are a race then they would be an unusual race which fuses racial identity with corrupt theology.
Title: Re: αnтι-ѕємιтє
Post by: Croix de Fer on April 27, 2018, 12:10:51 AM
One of the best ways to demoralize, disarm and weaken the Jєω is to call him a Jєω to his face. Do it without fear and inhibition.

The double whammy is to follow it by telling him, and everyone within hearing distance, that his "antisemite" & "white supremacist" card is a projection of himself. Everything the Jєω accuses of white, heterosɛҳuąƖ, Christian men is actually manifested by the Jєω. They invert reality.
Title: Re: αnтι-ѕємιтє
Post by: klasG4e on April 27, 2018, 10:17:18 AM
One of the best ways to demoralize, disarm and weaken the Jєω is to call him a Jєω to his face. Do it without fear and inhibition.

The double whammy is to follow it by telling him, and everyone within hearing distance, that his "antisemite" & "white supremacist" card is a projection of himself. Everything the Jєω accuses of white, heterosɛҳuąƖ, Christian men is actually manifested by the Jєω. They invert reality.

A word that really seems to touch a nerve with them is parasite.

Holding up a crucifix while praying at an abortion mill for example can really make them (and any other militant feminized pro-aborts) go ballistic.

It's good to stand a good arm's length of a Jєω (or perhaps even farther -- spitting length) if while bargaining with him you accuse him of trying to "Jєω" you down.
Title: Re: αnтι-ѕємιтє
Post by: Croix de Fer on April 27, 2018, 02:59:58 PM
Jєωιѕн Genome

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XsqvWKTrsLg
Title: Re: αnтι-ѕємιтє
Post by: rum on April 28, 2018, 03:31:43 PM
Sure, assuming the Khazar theory is true, which I suspect it is. If we define a Jєω as "one who privately, but not necessarily publically, identifies as a Jєω" I'd guesstimate that 100 million is a closer tally.
To quote my own post, Barack Obama's mother was a Jєω, but she's listed as Caucasian on his birth certificate. How many people who privately and not necessarily publically identify as Jєωs aren't listed as Jєωs on government docuмents? I'd guess a majority. No way there's only 14 million Jєωs in the world. They're probably more numerous than any single white ethnic group.
 (https://i.imgur.com/WYpJAH1.jpg)(https://i.imgur.com/0qjaZUP.jpg)
Title: Re: αnтι-ѕємιтє
Post by: rum on April 28, 2018, 03:40:19 PM
A word that really seems to touch a nerve with them is parasite.

Holding up a crucifix while praying at an abortion mill for example can really make them (and any other militant feminized pro-aborts) go ballistic.

It's good to stand a good arm's length of a Jєω (or perhaps even farther -- spitting length) if while bargaining with him you accuse him of trying to "Jєω" you down.
Conan O'Brien going nuts when some Canadian kid says he "was Jєωed." The kid precedes that with saying he was gypped, at which O'Brien takes no offense. O'Brien says he's "half-Jєωιѕн." I don't know if one of his parents is Jєωιѕн, or maybe his wife is Jєωιѕн.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dfs4PDEfc6I

Title: Re: αnтι-ѕємιтє
Post by: Croix de Fer on April 28, 2018, 03:48:29 PM
Regardless of the actual genome of the Jєωs, they're a cursed race which is reflected by their phenotype that is, usually, identifiable by people who are awake to them. The curse stems from the events in Matthew 27:25. I think people, who are awake to the Jєω, sometimes focus too much on the whether the Khazar theory is correct or not. The bigger issue is they're spiritually ruptured from the God of their fathers, hence they're the ѕуηαgσgυє of Satan (Rev 2:9 & 3:9). In rejecting Jesus Christ, they reject the Mosaic Law, Abraham, the prophesies and, ultimately, God.
Title: Re: αnтι-ѕємιтє
Post by: Croix de Fer on April 28, 2018, 04:01:47 PM

I mean, Khazar ancestry or no Khazar ancestry, the unbaptized Jєω is just too damn Jugly. :laugh1:
Title: Re: αnтι-ѕємιтє
Post by: LaramieHirsch on April 29, 2018, 02:27:06 AM
A lot of discussion about Jєωs, here at the end of April.  I looked in my records, and I couldn't help but notice the same trend this time last year in Catholic circles.  

In any event, I've got a new one if anyone's interested.  

“¡Anti-Semitism!” (http://forge-and-anvil.com/2018/04/29/anti-semitism/)

Enjoy.  -LH