Neither AI nor "Two Volumes" were remotely necessary to shred Salza & Siscoe.

Right.


So, if some newbie to tradition comes across their trash, and they lap it up - they might end up believing Salsa and Siscoe actually know what they are talking about. After all, "they are brilliant lawyers/men of business who have spent years researching the Church... blah, blah, blah..."

Maybe this person doesn't know about Fr. Cekda's video, or won't listen to him for one reason or another...

and maybe they didn't stumble onto CathInfo and your brillant shredding of these clowns.

and maybe they can't easily purchase (or get through) one of Fr. Kramer's tomes which is full of email exchanges between Salza/Siscoe and himself where he attempts to show their duplicity and refute their lies, etc.

This is where the AI can actually come in useful.

Sometimes it actually does get things right (such as in the case of the above).

Or,

You could contend that it was just "lucky" that it got it right...

Or,

It is full of bugs and the above is neither accurate nor 100% correct.

Or,

Knowing that it had already been clued into the sources they cite, and having vetted them when doing my "una cuм" research, it had remembered what its findings were and simply applied them to "True or False Pope". The AI suggested this to me - to critque their book - only AFTER it (copilot) was made aware of Grok's critque of its own formulation on the "una cuм". Once it detected that Grok was pulling from True vs. False Pope, it was able to compare those writings to the actual sources it cites and then easily demolish/destroy their wad of toilet paper they call a book.