Boycott Walmart, Amazon, Sears & Ebay for banning sales of the Confederate flag - a flag that represents freedom from a despotic, centralized government (that is now run by Jєωs), and represents what was once a homogenous, European-descended, "Christian" land, and now, more or less, represents a form of resistance to the anti-Christ nєω ωσrℓ∂ σr∂єr that is spearheaded by the Satanic U.S. government.

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/embed/2OAZ5geZUU4#t=179[/youtube]

People were actually trying to buy them as quick as they could so that they could burn them in protest.

Idiots.

After talking to local farmers in South Carolina, brokers from northeast are still ripping them off.

I missed the beginning of this latest assault on the Confederate Battle flag, where/when/why did this latest round of attacks begin?  

To me it seems to have come out of nowhere, what did I miss?

I know the flag has long been controversial, and a few years ago people were talking about "banning" it, but that did not gain traction.  

Why has it suddenly gained traction now?

Boycott Walmart, Amazon, Sears & Ebay for banning sales of the Confederate Flag--a flag that represents freedom from a despotic, centralized government [...], and represents what was once a homogenous, European-descended, "Christian" land, and now, more or less, represents a form of resistance to the anti-Christ nєω ωσrℓ∂ σr∂єr that is spearheaded by the Satanic U.S. government.

<https://www.youtube.com/embed/[base-64 encoding elided]#t=179>

Am I to assume that your only evidence for the alarming topic-title that you chose: "Amazon Ordered By Feds To Stop Selling Confederate Flag", an alleged governmental action whose legal basis seems to me to be extremely dubious[/b], is some youtube video of unspecified length, that you expect us all to passively sit and watch, as if it were a mandatory message from "a despotic, centralized government", for however many minutes of our days that it uses up--maybe even wastes!?

Ain't gonna happen.  I'm among those CathInfo members on limited budgets, and I can't afford to keep stuffing miniature memory boards (e.g.: DIMMs, SIMMs) in otherwise plenty-usable-enough computers, just so we can keep up with the continually increasing memory demands of increasingly bloated operating systems and video applications, and gaining what in return?  Being able to passively watch newer on-line videos!?

So, am I to believe that there's no smug mainstream-verbal-media writer anywhere to whom you could've linked for her|his self-righteous confirmation of your topic-title?

The corporate masters of the nєω ωσrℓ∂ σr∂єr are determined to get you accustomed to paying princely sums to subscribe to services that encourage you to "consume content" without gaining any kind of ownership of it; those NWO financial goals are to reduce their own costs, while inflating your regular expenditures for data transfer: a goal that increasing-resolution video is especially effective at satisfying on a continuing basis.

If you've got important straightforward news that you want to get out to as many people as possible, it's simple: Use text!

This concludes this computerist's rant-on-technology for today.

Huh? I'm not impressed.

The feeling's mutual: Your cluelessly fully quoting my entire posting to which you added only 4 words of vague reply!?  That's a pointless waste of Matthew's server resources.

But my memory now has been refreshed: You're the CathInfo member who routinely embeds videos, including in the original postings of topics, with no introduction or explanation whatsoever: Not even why we ought to believe as much as a single word of what the video might try to tell us, expecting CathInfo members to passively watch each one, for forever how-many minutes it lasts.  I'm somewhat surprised that Matthew hasn't decided that your behavior constitutes spamming CathInfo.

As I said above, for many of us, ain't gonna happen!  Certainly not for video from notorious producers of spyware like the principals of the <GodlikeProductions.com>  in the original posting.  Is it at all prudent to play videos created by people who are notorious for developing spyware?  So it might not be sufficiently prudent simply to configure one's YouTube player to use HTML5 instead of Adobe Flash, altho' the latter (and software masquerading as it) is increasingly used as a means to spread malware, notably ransomware, since at least 2013.

I heard on the news ([...]--a REAL source of news) today[....]

Ah!   Now I've made the connection: There's a posting by Matthew from 4 years ago (thus predating my membership on CathInfo) that's still relevant:

Godlike Productions is Big Brother[/url]": Apr 3, 2011, 10:53 pm)]More Proof Godlike Productions is Big Brother
Sunday, April 03, 2011

• 9:10

From:  intheknow7.wordpress.com/2010/04/11
/godlike-productions-glp-%E2%80%9Ccontrolled-opposition%E2%80%9D-gatekeepers-for-global-mgt-team/
[....]

Matthew's efficiency in this instance is quite remarkable, reposting the long blog entry from <intheknow7.wordpress.com> onto CathInfo within 2 hours of its appearance (or reäppearance

• ). Readers might be interested to learn that the original posting at that source is still accessible on line; that's because readers will need to visit it if they want follow any of its links (which are plainly missing from what was apparently a simple text copy-&-paste by Matthew).
  
  -------
  Note #: I'm assuming that the self-contradictory "/2010/04/11/" in the URL and the text date "2011" indicates a major writhru (i.e.: journalistic abbrev. for write-through, meaning a rewrite treated as a complete replacement) of a blog entry originally posted in 2010.

Quote from: ascent (Jun 29, 2015, 8:24 am)

Huh? I'm not impressed.

The feeling's mutual: Your cluelessly fully quoting my entire posting to which you added only 4 words of vague reply!?  That's a pointless waste of Matthew's server resources.

But my memory now has been refreshed: You're the CathInfo member who routinely embeds videos, including in the original postings of topics, with no introduction or explanation whatsoever: Not even why we ought to believe as much as a single word of what the video might try to tell us, expecting CathInfo members to passively watch each one, for forever how-many minutes it lasts.  I'm somewhat surprised that Matthew hasn't decided that your behavior constitutes spamming CathInfo.

As I said above, for many of us, ain't gonna happen!  Certainly not for video from notorious producers of spyware like the principals of the <GodlikeProductions.com>  in the original posting.  Is it at all prudent to play videos created by people who are notorious for developing spyware?  So it might not be sufficiently prudent simply to configure one's YouTube player to use HTML5 instead of Adobe Flash, altho' the latter (and software masquerading as it) is increasingly used as a means to spread malware, notably ransomware, since at least 2013.

Quote from: Matthew (Jun 26, 2015, 1:11 am)

I heard on the news ([...]--a REAL source of news) today[....]

Ah!   Now I've made the connection: There's a posting by Matthew from 4 years ago (thus predating my membership on CathInfo) that's still relevant:

Quote from: Matthew ("[url=http://www.cathinfo.com/catholic.php/Godlike-Productions-is-Big-Brother

Godlike Productions is Big Brother[/url]": Apr 3, 2011, 10:53 pm)]More Proof Godlike Productions is Big Brother
Sunday, April 03, 2011

• 9:10

From:  intheknow7.wordpress.com/2010/04/11
/godlike-productions-glp-%E2%80%9Ccontrolled-opposition%E2%80%9D-gatekeepers-for-global-mgt-team/
[....]

Matthew's efficiency in this instance is quite remarkable, reposting the long blog entry from <intheknow7.wordpress.com> onto CathInfo within 2 hours of its appearance (or reäppearance

• ). Readers might be interested to learn that the original posting at that source is still accessible on line; that's because readers will need to visit it if they want follow any of its links (which are plainly missing from what was apparently a simple text copy-&-paste by Matthew).
  
  -------
  Note #: I'm assuming that the self-contradictory "/2010/04/11/" in the URL and the text date "2011" indicates a major writhru (i.e.: journalistic abbrev. for write-through, meaning a rewrite treated as a complete replacement) of a blog entry originally posted in 2010.

Huh ?????  

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/embed/a3HemKGDavw[/youtube]