He's got to be either a Jєω, or a fag himself.

(Being married doesn't prove anything. Michael Jackson got married -- to a woman -- for a while.)

Who the heck donates 2.5 million of their own money so that queers can be legally married?

Everyone with a brain knows that gαys don't *want* to be married. It's not in their culture. Marriage is for the founding of families, because children need two parents. They know very well that 2 men or 2 women can't produce children together. So why would they want to be married? But the fact is, they don't. All the publicity of so-called gαy Marriage is just to destroy the institution of marriage.

But it would be a mystery why Jeff Bezos is doing this, unless he's dedicated to destroying the morals of the goyim (pushing them ever downward), so they can more easily be controlled by his fellow Jєωs...

That is an interesting perspective and stance to take.  I would like to know how those same attitudes and definitions apply to the marketing of health insurance plans in which it is mandatory that it be explained that because of Obamacare all birth control products, abortions and all the other evils associated with this plan are mandated by this law even if you are against it, or don't want it- it's there and you can't take it out-you are paying for it; and if I object to being forced to reveal it right out the shoot-TOUGH!- They will tell me to sell vacuums or encyclopedias.

Now, mind you this is an honest question- not meant to be combative, contentious, or rotten in any way, shape, or form.  I'm wondering what ethical and moral codes of conduct I'm putting myself at risk of, but more importantly, what Faith matters are going to be violated in such matters.

Well, at least some of the answer to my question was waiting for me to read in my 'inbox'...


Contraceptive Mandate Suffers Court Blow as Catholic Business Wins Crucial Court Case

Read more on Newsmax.com: Contraceptive Mandate Suffers Court Blow as Catholic Business Wins Crucial Court Case

A Colorado business owned by a Catholic family does not have to comply with President Barack Obama's new healthcare mandate that private employers provide employees with insurance coverage of birth control, a Colorado federal judge ruled on Friday.

U.S. District Judge John Kane in Denver temporarily blocked the government from the enforcing the contraception requirement against the religious owners of Hercules Industries Inc, a private manufacturer of heating, ventilation and air conditioning equipment.

The ruling only affects this plaintiff but opens the door for any company to seek relief on religious grounds. Lawyers for the Department of Health and Human Services argued that a temporary exemption for Hercules would interfere with the government's ability to implement the law. But Kane was not persuaded.

"This harm pales in comparison to the possible infringement upon (the Newland family's) constitutional and statutory rights," the judge wrote. He noted that the government had already created numerous exceptions for religious employers, exempting over 190 million health plan participants.

The law posed an imminent harm to the company's owners by forcing them to support contraception, sterilization and abortion in violation of their religious beliefs or face steep fines, Kane said.

Members of the Newland family, which owns Hercules, sued in April, challenging the provision that is part of the new health care law, the Affordable Care Act of 2010.

Roman Catholic bishops and many Republican lawmakers oppose the provision. The Catholic Church launched a campaign against it from Sunday Mass pulpits across the country. Catholic Church doctrine opposes artificial contraception but most American Catholics do not adhere to church policy.

Hercules provides a self-insured group plan for its 265 full-time employees that does not cover birth control, sterilization or abortion-inducing drugs. But the new regulation would require Hercules to provide such coverage by Nov. 1, the ruling said.

Department of Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius expressed disappointment with the decision in a statement.

"This lawsuit was not brought by a religious organization. Rather, it was brought by a for-profit commercial enterprise whose purpose is to sell HVAC equipment," she said, adding that healthcare decisions should be between women and their doctors, not their employers.

"Every American, including family business owners, should be free to live and do business according to their faith," Matthew Bowman, a lawyer for Hercules with the Alliance Defense Fund, said in a statement.

More than 20 lawsuits are pending around the country against the birth control mandate, brought by organizations including the University of Notre Dame, Catholic University of America and the Archdiocese of New York.

On July 17, another federal judge in Nebraska dismissed a similar lawsuit brought by seven states, two Catholic individuals and three Catholic non-profit institutions, finding that the plaintiffs did not face any immediate harm from the law.

© 2012 Thomson/Reuters. All rights reserved.

Well, at least some of the answer to my question was waiting for me to read in my 'inbox'...


Contraceptive Mandate Suffers Court Blow as Catholic Business Wins Crucial Court Case

Read more on Newsmax.com: Contraceptive Mandate Suffers Court Blow as Catholic Business Wins Crucial Court Case

A Colorado business owned by a Catholic family does not have to comply with President Barack Obama's new healthcare mandate that private employers provide employees with insurance coverage of birth control, a Colorado federal judge ruled on Friday.

U.S. District Judge John Kane in Denver temporarily blocked the government from the enforcing the contraception requirement against the religious owners of Hercules Industries Inc, a private manufacturer of heating, ventilation and air conditioning equipment.

The ruling only affects this plaintiff but opens the door for any company to seek relief on religious grounds. Lawyers for the Department of Health and Human Services argued that a temporary exemption for Hercules would interfere with the government's ability to implement the law. But Kane was not persuaded.

"This harm pales in comparison to the possible infringement upon (the Newland family's) constitutional and statutory rights," the judge wrote. He noted that the government had already created numerous exceptions for religious employers, exempting over 190 million health plan participants.

The law posed an imminent harm to the company's owners by forcing them to support contraception, sterilization and abortion in violation of their religious beliefs or face steep fines, Kane said.

Members of the Newland family, which owns Hercules, sued in April, challenging the provision that is part of the new health care law, the Affordable Care Act of 2010.

Roman Catholic bishops and many Republican lawmakers oppose the provision. The Catholic Church launched a campaign against it from Sunday Mass pulpits across the country. Catholic Church doctrine opposes artificial contraception but most American Catholics do not adhere to church policy.

Hercules provides a self-insured group plan for its 265 full-time employees that does not cover birth control, sterilization or abortion-inducing drugs. But the new regulation would require Hercules to provide such coverage by Nov. 1, the ruling said.

Department of Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius expressed disappointment with the decision in a statement.

"This lawsuit was not brought by a religious organization. Rather, it was brought by a for-profit commercial enterprise whose purpose is to sell HVAC equipment," she said, adding that healthcare decisions should be between women and their doctors, not their employers.

"Every American, including family business owners, should be free to live and do business according to their faith," Matthew Bowman, a lawyer for Hercules with the Alliance Defense Fund, said in a statement.

More than 20 lawsuits are pending around the country against the birth control mandate, brought by organizations including the University of Notre Dame, Catholic University of America and the Archdiocese of New York.

On July 17, another federal judge in Nebraska dismissed a similar lawsuit brought by seven states, two Catholic individuals and three Catholic non-profit institutions, finding that the plaintiffs did not face any immediate harm from the law.

© 2012 Thomson/Reuters. All rights reserved.

I doubt very much if it was preached from all the novus ordo pulpits especially liberal and very pro choice New Jersey.

The ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ seems to be our elites idea of, the "ideal man."  

Quote from: Marcelino

The ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ seems to be our elites idea of, the "ideal man."  

To the feminine, cowardly, pacifist "man" he is indeed the 'ideal.'

Yeah, all opposites of how a virtuous man is supposed to act, but describe in detail, one consumed by vice.

Bacchus, the roman god of wine, became more and more effiminate as time went on.  Dionysius, his greek counterpart, was half man and half woman.  

ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs are "unnatural" and aristotle said usury was "unnatural," since money doesn't procreate and hence, should not be "re-producing."  

Quote from: Marcelino

Quote from: Traditional Guy 20

Quote from: Marcelino

The ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ seems to be our elites idea of, the "ideal man."  

To the feminine, cowardly, pacifist "man" he is indeed the 'ideal.'

Yeah, all opposites of how a virtuous man is supposed to act, but describe in detail, one consumed by vice.

Bacchus, the roman god of wine, became more and more effiminate as time went on.  Dionysius, his greek counterpart, was half man and half woman.  

ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs are "unnatural" and aristotle said usury was "unnatural," since money doesn't procreate and hence, should not be "re-producing."  

Well Rome also became like Weimar Germany with ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity and pagan orgies. Yes ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs are against Nature which is why God himself punishes this mental sickness with destruction of society and AIDs. As for consumerism and hedonism those are American values I find revolting. I don't believe in American "exceptionalism."

The housing bubble should prove that God punishes usury too.