MORE ABOUT EINSTEIN
‘There had to be an explanation [for the Airy and M&M test result]. Either the Earth was motionless with respect to the ether, or the Earth dragged the ether with it, or something. All possible explanations seemed highly unlikely, and for nearly a quarter of a century, the world of science was completely puzzled. It took a scientific revolution to explain the matter, so that the Michelson-Morley experiment is perhaps the most important “failure” in the history of science.’---Isaac Asimov: Chronology of Science & Discovery, p.388.
O.K., here above the author Isaac Asimov shows us again that the ‘progress’ of modern cosmology is ideologically based and not empirically founded. He does this by telling us they rejected perfectly valid interpretations of two different empirical tests showing the Earth does not orbit the sun, readings they could not falsify. He then tells us it took a scientific revolution to explain the matter. Such ‘revolutions,’ the Illuminati know, are best brought about by individuals in whom the public would be conditioned to accept as men of ‘great genius.’
‘The enemies of society are bent on persuading us that mankind is evolving and progressing and that the intellectual capacities of the human being are steadily increasing. This deification of the modern man, and what is being attempted is no less than that, is greatly assisted if the last century or so is shown to have produced intellectuals of unprecedented capacity, capable of opening the eyes of the world to truths which had remained hidden in all previous centuries of his history. The second generality is that it is much easier to impose false beliefs on the world if they are personalised. If a theory is put forward without reference to the person who originated it, there will be a tendency for it to be judged on its merits and then, if it clearly has no merits, for it to be rejected. This is far from being the case if a theory - however ludicrously opposed to common sense - is put forward by a man of universally acknowledged genius. Now the tendency will be for the theory to be examined with respect, if it cannot be understood this will be ascribed to the incapacity of the person examining the theory; if it appears manifestly illogical it will be assumed that the originator has grasped a logic that is beyond the reach of lesser mortals. In short it will gradually become accepted on no better grounds than the authority of the person who has advanced it.’--- N. Martin Gwynne: Einstein and Modern Physics, Briton’s Library, 1985, p.5.
Who then was the miracle worker called in to convince the world that the M&M experiment really didn’t provide evidence for a stationary Earth? After much consideration the powers that be - those who decide how mankind should think about themselves and the universe they live in, those who throughout history have implemented their Egyptian, hermetic, Pythagorean, cabbalistic, Gnostic, and Masonic cosmic worldview; settled on Albert Einstein (1879-1955), a school dropout who once worked in a patent office. Were it not for the need to get the Earth moving again, it is probable the world would never have heard of Albert Einstein. Using this man they achieved their goal, for today Einstein’s reputation as a genius knows no bounds, his name now synonymous with the idea of genuine superior human brainpower.
So, who was this man whose pickled smallish brain now languishes in a jar in Texas USA? Albert Einstein was born in 1879 to non-practising Jєωιѕн parents in Ulm, in southwest Germany. At the age of six he entered a Catholic primary school where he received a Catholic education. Meanwhile, Albert’s parents paid a relative to teach him the fundamentals of Judaism. According to Max Jammer, as a young boy, Albert Einstein extracted from Catholicism and Judaism elements common to both and that this excited in him a fervent religious sentiment including a desire to live a life pleasing to God. He spent several years living in what he later called ‘a religious paradise.’[1] (http://file:///C:/Users/JamesRedmond/Desktop/TE%20THE%20BOOK.doc#_ftn1)
Einstein’s brief encounter with the old Jєωιѕн-Christian line of thought however, ended at the age of twelve when he was introduced to popular books on science, mathematics and geometry. One of these, we are told, Immanuel Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason, had a profound affect on his thinking. As a programmed Copernican, uniformitarian and evolutionist, Einstein concluded that the Bible must be mythical, and like others around him at the time decided he too must get into this new cosmic-religion business. He then became a devoted fan of Benedict de Spinoza, the 17th century Jєωιѕн philosopher who advocated a ‘god’ of nature rather than a personal God. ‘Neither intellect nor will appertain to God’s nature,’ taught Spinoza, and that the appropriate object of religious devotion is the harmony of the universe. Thus emerged Einstein’s cosmic religiosity, and while he never propounded his beliefs up front, he was always delighted to respond to frequently asked questions by journalists etc., about his religious beliefs. While he declared that he believed in ‘the god of Spinoza,’ he never disputed the usefulness of conventional religion.
Because of innumerable books on Albert Einstein and his contribution to both faith and science, we are told many things about the man. One such publication, Einstein in Love: A Scientific Romance, [2] (http://file:///C:/Users/JamesRedmond/Desktop/TE%20THE%20BOOK.doc#_ftn2) inspired such headlines as ‘Einstein: genius and dirty old man’ because it exposes the many human failings of Einstein, calling him ‘a philanderer [adulterer], a draft dodger and a hustler whose long-suffering wife Mileva Maric (a Serbian physics student who co-authored some of his scientific theories but got no recognition for them) mortgaged her happiness for his.’[3] (http://file:///C:/Users/JamesRedmond/Desktop/TE%20THE%20BOOK.doc#_ftn3) According to Overbye; ‘by the time they divorced she was a paranoid wreck. To him, she began as one of his rechnenpferde (literally, “calculating horses” who did the mathematical proofs of his theories) and became “the employee I can’t fire.”’ Einstein’s use of people, we read, was not the thoughtless self-indulgence of a spoiled brat. His calculation was almost mathematical if you will pardon the pun. When he became engaged to Mileva he continued to send his laundry to an earlier girlfriend. An affair with his 42-year-old cousin – which prompted his divorce – turned into an infatuation with her 20-year-old daughter. By then, however, his attraction had deserted him and the girl turned him down. His personal habits, like his reluctance to bathe and telling dirty jokes accompanied by a “seal-like laugh” may have influenced her somewhat. Wilkes however, in keeping with Einstein’s popularity in the world, puts aside morals as secondary and ends his review with praise: ‘Overbye, who is a scientist himself, also offers a beautiful exposition of the achievements of Einstein the scientist and thinker.’ It seems that no matter what, homo consensus will always be led to believe that Albert Einstein’s relativist theories contributed something useful to human knowledge, and it is for this that even a ‘dirty old man’ can be revered among the greats of history. This man’s image is everywhere, on many world postage stamps, and more books about him continue to be published. Einstein’s most fanciful award however was posthumous, being named TIME magazine’s ‘Person of the Century.’ This distinction they award to the one they believe had the greatest influence in the 20th century, for good or evil. Now consider the impact Marx, Stalin, Hitler or Mao had on the last century and we will see just how important the powers that be place on modern cosmology. Consider this view in the light of his theories having been rubbished and falsified throughout the century and you should recognise propaganda personified.
[1] (http://file:///C:/Users/JamesRedmond/Desktop/TE%20THE%20BOOK.doc#_ftnref1) Max Jammer; Einstein and Religion, Princeton University Press, 2000.
[2] (http://file:///C:/Users/JamesRedmond/Desktop/TE%20THE%20BOOK.doc#_ftnref2) Denis Overbye: Einstein in Love, Bloomsbury, 2001.
[3] (http://file:///C:/Users/JamesRedmond/Desktop/TE%20THE%20BOOK.doc#_ftnref3) Alan Wilks: Irish Independent, Sat. 26 May 2001.
Einstein in Love: A Scientific Romance, [2] (http://file:///C:/Users/JamesRedmond/Desktop/TE%20THE%20BOOK.doc#_ftn2) inspired such headlines as ‘Einstein: genius and dirty old man’ because it exposes the many human failings of Einstein, calling him ‘a philanderer [adulterer], a draft dodger and a hustler whose long-suffering wife Mileva Maric (a Serbian physics student who co-authored some of his scientific theories but got no recognition for them) mortgaged her happiness for his.’[3] (http://file:///C:/Users/JamesRedmond/Desktop/TE%20THE%20BOOK.doc#_ftn3) According to Overbye; ‘by the time they divorced she was a paranoid wreck. To him, she began as one of his rechnenpferde (literally, “calculating horses” who did the mathematical proofs of his theories) and became “the employee I can’t fire.”’ Einstein’s use of people, we read, was not the thoughtless self-indulgence of a spoiled brat. His calculation was almost mathematical if you will pardon the pun. When he became engaged to Mileva he continued to send his laundry to an earlier girlfriend. An affair with his 42-year-old cousin – which prompted his divorce – turned into an infatuation with her 20-year-old daughter. By then, however, his attraction had deserted him and the girl turned him down. His personal habits, like his reluctance to bathe and telling dirty jokes
Hmmm.....and one more super hyped up atheist scientist who the world bows down to....https://www.thedailybeast.com/the-other-side-of-stephen-hawking-strippers-aliens-and-disturbing-abuse-claims (https://www.thedailybeast.com/the-other-side-of-stephen-hawking-strippers-aliens-and-disturbing-abuse-claims)
The Other Side of Stephen Hawking: Strippers, Aliens, and Disturbing Abuse Claims
(https://img.thedailybeast.com/image/upload/c_fill,h_200,w_200,x_0,y_0/v1490733486/author/20170327-stern-marlow-author.jpg) (https://www.thedailybeast.com/author/marlow-stern)Marlow Stern
(https://www.thedailybeast.com/author/marlow-stern)
11.06.14 7:21 AM ET
(https://img.thedailybeast.com/image/upload/c_crop,d_placeholder_euli9k,h_1439,w_2560,x_0,y_0/dpr_2.0/c_limit,w_740/fl_lossy,q_auto/v1492193964/articles/2014/11/06/the-other-side-of-stephen-hawking-strippers-aliens-and-disturbing-abuse-claims/141103-stern-hawking-tease_scn5zt)
Fox
Stephen Hawking is not only a bona fide genius, but also one of the most resilient men on the planet. Diagnosed with ALS at 21 and given just two years to live, he’s survived for 51 years with the debilitating disease and achieved numerous breakthroughs in the field of theoretical physics pertaining to black holes and the origins of the universe. Since ALS has left him almost entirely paralyzed, to speak, he has an infrared sensor mounted on his eyeglasses that picks up twitches from a muscle in his cheek and transmits them to a screen with scrolling letters, stopping at each desired letter. He averages about a word a minute.
In James Marsh’s biopic The Theory of Everything, in theaters Nov. 7, Eddie Redmayne (http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/11/03/eddie-redmayne-s-time-has-come-on-his-heartrending-turn-as-stephen-hawking-and-benedict-bromance.html) delivers an awe-inspiring performance as Hawking, from his days courting Jane Wilde (Felicity Jones), an English student whom he met (and later married) whilst at Cambridge just prior to his diagnosis, through to his physical decline, subsequent marital struggles, and staggering scientific achievements. It is, by and large, a hagiography painting an overwhelmingly positive picture of a truly complex figure, and is based on Jane Hawking’s revised memoir, Travelling to Infinity: My Life with Stephen, which was released in 2007.
Eight years prior, Jane Hawking had released a decidedly less harmonious memoir, Music to Move the Stars. It was 610 pages to Infinity’s abridged 450, and recounts in grim detail her miserable marriage to the “Master of the Universe,” and her determination to stay married to him even as his disease—and ego—began to consume him in equal measure. She details how he, for many years, wanted no one but her to wash, clothe, and feed him. How he was so reluctant to use a wheelchair that she’d be balancing him on one arm and a toddler with the other. How her role became more “maternal rather than marital,” and branding Hawking an “all-powerful emperor” and “masterly puppeteer.” Later, she wrote, “It was becoming very difficult—unnatural, even—to feel desire for someone with the body of a h0Ɩ0cαųst victim and the undeniable needs of an infant.”
In a fun aside, during this period, Hawking would enjoy running over the toes of people he didn’t like with his wheelchair. So in 1976, when Hawking was invited to attend Prince Charles’s induction into the Royal Society, he gave him the business. “The prince was intrigued by Hawking’s wheelchair, and Hawking, twirling it around to demonstrate its capabilities, carelessly ran over Prince Charles’s toes,” according to the biography Stephen Hawking: An Unfettered Mind. “One of Hawking’s regrets in life was not having an opportunity to run over Margaret Thatcher’s toes.”
But in society and scientific circles, Jane felt like a second-class citizen, often forced into the wives’ corner while the male “geniuses” talked shop, rendering her “little more than a drudge, effectively reduced to that role which in Cambridge academic circles epitomized a woman’s place.” She began to suffer from huge bouts of depression and was reduced to "a brittle, empty shell, alone and vulnerable, restrained only by the thought of my children from throwing myself into the river, drowning in a slough of despond, I prayed for help with the desperate insistency of a potential ѕυιcιdє.” She was effectively trapped in the marriage. “I couldn’t go off and leave Stephen,” she wrote in Music to Move the Stars. “Coals of fire would have been heaped on my head if I had.” In the mid-1980s, Jane met an organist, Jonathan Hellyer Jones, and—with Hawking’s permission—began an affair, but continued to love Hawking and stayed married.
In the late 1980s, Hawking began to grow close to his redheaded, controlling nurse, Elaine Mason. By Feb. 1990, he left the family home to be with Mason, officially divorced Jane in the spring of 1995, and married Mason that September. The following year, Jane married Jones.
Despite Jane’s assertion to (http://www.vanityfair.com/culture/features/2004/06/hawking200406) Vanity Fair that “in 25 years of living with me, he had not one unexplained bruise,” shortly after his marriage to Mason, the professor began suffering a series of mysterious injuries. A fractured wrist. A broken arm. A split lip. A broken femur. Three slash marks on his face. The media, Hawking’s two children, and Jane all blamed Mason. Several nurses even came forward with testimony of Mason’s rages, including one incident where Hawking typed, “I CANNOT BE LEFT ALONE WITH HER. PLEASE DON'T GO. GET SOMEONE TO COVER THE SHIFT.” Hawking’s former assistant, Sue Masey, claims that Mason’s behavior drove her to quit. “I left Stephen because I couldn’t stand it,” she told Vanity Fair. “Elaine is a monster.” The injuries, she says, only happened when Hawking and Mason were alone.
Things came to a head in Aug. 2003, when one of Hawking’s nurses called his daughter, Lucy, to report that he’d been badly burned after being left out in the scorching sun in his garden all day. Police opened an investigation, interviewing 10 of the scientist’s current and former nurses, but due to a lack of concrete evidence, couldn’t press charges without Hawking’s testimony. “I firmly and wholeheartedly reject the allegations,” Hawking said from a Cambridge Hospital. “My wife and I love each other very much, and it is only because of her that I am alive today.” According to the London Times, Mason was at one point asked to leave that very hospital during a visit because she was “throwing things around the room.”
Up until 2004, when she granted a rare interview (http://www.theguardian.com/theobserver/2004/apr/04/features.review17) to The Guardian, Jane and her two children with Hawking weren’t on speaking terms with the genius.
“I used to see him. I never set foot in his house, of course—that is very much forbidden territory,” she said. “But I used to go and see him in his office, and we used to have a good time, talking about the children and then about William, our grandchild. But I don't even know now whether he is in hospital or back at home. The children don't know either. So that,” she says sadly, “is where we are.”
Then, in 2006, Hawking and Elaine divorced, and neither of them spoke about the marriage. After that,
Hawking became closer with Jane and their two children, and then the abridged memoir was released.
Hawking also harbors some controversial views, including supporting an academic boycott of Israel—a position he reaffirmed last May (http://www.jpost.com/Diplomacy-and-Politics/Stephen-Hawking-reaffirms-support-of-Israel-boycott-312505) after dropping out of the President’s Conference in Jerusalem. He also believes in aliens, which he divulged on the Discovery Channel special Into the Universe with Stephen Hawking. “If aliens visit us, the outcome would be much as when Columbus landed in America, which didn't turn out well for the Native Americans,” he said on the program. “Such advanced aliens would perhaps become nomads, looking to conquer and colonize whatever planets they can reach. To my mathematical brain, the numbers alone make thinking about aliens perfectly rational. The real challenge is to work out what aliens might actually be like.” Hawking also believes that we may create a virus that destroys us, and that creating space colonies will be our only hope.
“In the long term, I am more worried about biology,” he told (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1359562/Colonies-in-space-may-be-only-hope-says-Hawking.html) The Telegraph. “Nuclear weapons need large facilities, but genetic engineering can be done in a small lab. You can’t regulate every lab in the world. The danger is that either by accident or design, we create a virus that destroys us. I don’t think the human race will survive the next thousand years, unless we spread into space. There are too many accidents that can befall life on a single planet. But I’m an optimist. We will reach out to the stars.”
On a lighter note, Hawking is also said to be a big fan of strip clubs. “He’s a man who lives within his brain and still manages to feel the overwhelming power of sex,” his pal Peter Stringfellow, who runs Stringfellows strip clubs, told (http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/interview-id-love-to-be-stephen-hawking-from-his-fourinabed-childhood-to-dancing-girls-every-night-peter-stringfellow-knows-all-about-how-to-turn-fantasy-into-reality-1385277.html) The Independent. “Isn’t he the answer to people who attack the sɛҳuąƖ side of our human-ness? They’re all charging at windmills, you know. It’s there.”
Hawking became a regular (http://www.stringfellows.co.uk/professor-stephen-hawking/) at Stringfellows strip club in London, and the proprietor recalls a hilarious run-in with the professor one night.
“I went and introduced myself and said, ‘Mr. Hawking, it’s an honor to meet you. If you could spare a minute or two, I’d love to chat with you about the universe,’” Stringfellow recalled (http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/peter-stringfellow-picks-stephen-hawking-814471).
“Then I paused for a bit and joked, ‘Or would you rather look at the girls?’
“There was silence for a moment, and then he answered, ‘The Girls.’”
Hawking has also reportedly been spotted (http://nypost.com/2012/02/24/acclaimed-physicist-hawking-a-regular-at-calif-strip-joint/) numerous times getting lap dances at the California strip club Devore, and was even said (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/02/28/stephen-hawking-said-to-frequent-sex-club_n_1307625.html) to have frequented Freedom Acres, a swinger’s club in California.
“I have seen Stephen Hawking at the club more than a handful of times,” a member said, according to (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/02/28/stephen-hawking-said-to-frequent-sex-club_n_1307625.html) the Huffington Post. “He arrives with an entourage of nurses and assistants. Last time I saw him, he was in the back ‘play area’ lying on a bed fully clothed with two naked women gyrating all over him.”
Tim Holt, University of Cambridge press officer, later confirmed that Hawking had frequented the swinger’s club, but claimed that he wasn’t a regular. “This report is greatly exaggerated. He visited once a few years ago with friends while on a visit to California,” Holt told (http://www.cambridge-news.co.uk/Stephen-Hawking-visited-sex-club/story-22358096-detail/story.html) the Cambridge News.
They don't call him the "Master of the Universe" for nothing.
‘No sooner did the news leak out that Einstein was coming to America than he was deluged with cabled invitations from presidents of academic institutions to lecture, and visit, and receive academic honours.’[1] (http://file:///C:/Users/JamesRedmond/Desktop/TE%20THE%20BOOK.doc#_ftn1)
Now praise from fellow boffins is one thing, but with Einstein it went further:
‘On 2nd April 1921, as the boat was docking, reporters besieged him on shipboard. The mayor of New York City gave him an official welcome as if he were an American war hero. President Harding invited him to the White House… In October Einstein left for a visit to Japan. Where ever he went enthusiastic crowds gathered spontaneously to catch a glimpse of him. He was even received by the Emperor. The newspapers vied with one another to report his activities in both factual and fictional detail. He was showered with honours and gifts.’[2] (http://file:///C:/Users/JamesRedmond/Desktop/TE%20THE%20BOOK.doc#_ftn2)
[1] (http://file:///C:/Users/JamesRedmond/Desktop/TE%20THE%20BOOK.doc#_ftnref1) B. Hoffmann and H. Dukas: Einstein, p.144.
[2] (http://file:///C:/Users/JamesRedmond/Desktop/TE%20THE%20BOOK.doc#_ftnref2) B. Hoffmann and H. Dukas: Einstein, p.150.
Einstein’s 50th birthday was a universal event. In 1952, after the death of Chaim Weizmann, Einstein was even asked to succeed him as President of the State of Israel. When Einstein died in 1955 the world mourned his passing. By way of the sponsorship of the heliocentric Masters, the man had been elevated to the status of a god, with knowledge beyond the human. Today, the world is never too far removed from Einstein. He is lauded by both Church and State who endlessly refer us to his opinions and make sure his memory appears in newspapers, journals, and on television on a regular basis. It would be hard to find a month go by without some reminder of him and his contribution to modern ‘science.’ He was truly a man for our gullible times. Of particular interest is that on Sept 28, 1979, on the 100th anniversary of Einstein’s birth, the philosopher pope had to join in.
‘[On this day] Pope John Paul II celebrated the anniversary of Einstein’s birth with a convocation of physicists, a congress addressed by an Agnostic, an expert in quantum physics, in the very room where Galileo was condemned. The Pope chose that room to have that activity there – to honour Einstein, to honour physics and even to honour science [and to announce the setting up of the commission to vindicate Galileo and thus denounce the popes and theologians of 1616].’[1] (http://file:///C:/Users/JamesRedmond/Desktop/TE%20THE%20BOOK.doc#_ftn1)
[1] (http://file:///C:/Users/JamesRedmond/Desktop/TE%20THE%20BOOK.doc#_ftnref1) Interview with Monsignor Lorenzo Albacete, priest and physicist, Professor of Theology at St Joseph’s University, New York.