No the didn't. They said that this issue belongs to the states and that pre-born life is not protected by the Constitution.
Those of us who have been on the front lines of pro-life since well before Roe, understand that we do not live in the world as we would like it to be. Instead, we live in reality.
Over 50 years ago, when we were unable to get a Constitutional Amendment protecting life, we realized that the only remaining alternative would be a state-by-state fight. That was the legal situation pre-Roe, and it is the situation now.
All this wishful thinking about what the SC should have done is coming from persons who have not been on the front lines of the battle and do not understand the legal realities put forth, and agreed upon by all pro-life Constitutional Attorneys.
Even Trump knew this during the debates when he predicted that he would appoint three Supreme Court judges and Roe would be overturned, and (sadly) that means the battle is now state-by-state.