Theres this Jєω at my new job. I say he is Jєωιѕн because I can tell just by looking at him.
Your skills of ethnic recognition must be remarkable indeed, if you can
visibly distinguish
modern Jєωs from other
Semites, especially Arabs (e.g.: Iraqis, Jordanians, "Palestinians").
Or following the
Kuzarim hypothesis, reliably distinguish the Jєωιѕн descendants of
Turkified Middle-Eastern/Central-Asian Semitic-or-Persian ethnic groups, from nonJєωιѕн descendants from comparable geographic & ethnic backgrounds. Especially after the additional genetic mixing when the Turkomongol hordes overran Biblical S.W. Asia, as far W. as (most of) Anatolia, briefly also holding Antioch, Aleppo, and Damascus in N. Syria.
Anyways, it seems to me that his face looks satanic. Almost like he is a descendant of the devil or something.
Can readers conclude that you consider "
look[
ing]
satanic" to be a characteristic unique to
Jєωs?  So that harsh description would never be applied to
any Muslims? 
Did you think that, e.g.,
Ayatollah Ruhollah
Khomeini, the nonSemitic "Supreme leader of the Islamic Republic of Iran", whether born an ethnic Persian or an Indian Hindu (the latter according to a British conspiracy theory), looked as if he professed a "
religion of peace"?  Could
anyone find a fur trimmed red suit & cap
anywhere that could've made him look the least bit
jolly?  Was it a fanatical Shiïte devotion to Allah, or cold-blooded dictatorship--or both--that caused him to order the execution of many thousands of his opponents? I suspect that for Wikipedia to indulge its political correctness favoring him as a "post-colonial leader", it had to lock down the obviously formal portrait it displays near the top of his article. But unless they were going to accept
that one being the only photo in the article, they had no choice but to display some of the grim images taken in a photojournalistic style.