Author Topic: A Study In Jєωιѕн Faces (Read 5680 times)

Croix de Fer · « **on:** November 13, 2014, 10:49:32 PM »

LINK

Quote

THE SHOW OF THEIR COUNTENANCE doth witness against them,” said the prophet Isaiah with regard to obdurate Jєωs.

“Thou hast a whore’s forehead,” added the prophet Jeremiah when reproving the Jєωs for their insolence.

Such is the inescapable lot of ’stiff-necked’ Jєωs throughout the centuries whose internal accursedness due to their rejection of Christ manifests itself in their appearance and air.

A notable example is the countenance of Ruth Bader Ginsburg of the Supreme Court.

When in her 40s, Ginsburg, though faintly attractive, bore the marks of discontent and obstinacy with an agenda forming resulting in a war on Christian morality in promoting the perverse sɛҳuąƖ practice of ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity.

Today, any vestige of former attractiveness has been transformed into a hideousness that revolts the eye and turns the stomach.

Many famed Jєωs display a feature that escapes the casual observer. But those with keener eyes perceive subtleties missed by duller sorts.

Given the secular orientation of most Jєωs and their abandonment of things of the Spirit, one can detect in the faces of popular Jєωιѕн figures an appearance that displays a mark of Godlessness.

Such is the look, even a pall of Deathliness, that spreads over the faces of several celebrated Jєωιѕн economists and hucksters.

And what can be said of Jєωιѕн lesbians and ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs?

Not only is any vestige of grace and adornment found in their faces, but rather a sickliness, seediness, and deep-seated ill-health.

Such is the combination of a Christ-denying temper coupled with a perverted sɛҳuąƖ lifestyle.

Woe unto those Jєωs who defy Christ both in stance and practice! A certain foretaste of the lower world spreads over their faces.

WHEN THE JєωS demanded of Pontius Pilate, “Crucify Him! His blood be upon us and upon our children!” they passed on to posterity the “Deicidal Curse”—the imprecation of “blood guilt” for murdering the Eternal Son of God.

The sin of Deicide is not committed with impunity and its characteristic marks are imprinted on its perpetrators.
___________________________________

For More See: Racial Traits Of The Jєωs Click Here

And: The Four Curses On Judaism Click Here

And: A Racial Philosophy Of History Click Here

And: Jєωιѕн Eugenics And The Master Race Click Here

And: The Alien Atmosphere Of The Jєω Click Here

poche · « **Reply #1 on:** November 13, 2014, 11:21:07 PM »

If you want to talk about people descended from Jєωs I think we should talk about St Theresa of Avila. She comes from a family of Conversos.

OHCA · « **Reply #2 on:** November 13, 2014, 11:49:34 PM »

Quote from: poche

If you want to talk about people descended from Jєωs I think we should talk about St Theresa of Avila. She comes from a family of Conversos.

DOWN-THUMB

poche · « **Reply #3 on:** November 14, 2014, 12:04:48 AM »

Quote from: OHCA

Quote from: poche
If you want to talk about people descended from Jєωs I think we should talk about St Theresa of Avila. She comes from a family of Conversos.

DOWN-THUMB

All twelve apostles were Jєωιѕн before they were Catholic.

Croix de Fer · « **Reply #4 on:** November 14, 2014, 01:55:47 AM »

Quote

If you want to talk about people descended from Jєωs I think we should talk about St Theresa of Avila. She comes from a family of Conversos.

You completely missed the point of the article, which was written by a man who grew up as a Jєω, too, just like St. Theresa's family, but converted to Christ.

Quote

All twelve apostles were Jєωιѕн before they were Catholic.

They were among the remnant who held the true Faith. Catholicism is the continuation of that Faith, bestowed upon Abraham by the Father, and fulfilled by His Only Begotten Son, hence the Apostles really didn't stop being Jєωs and then become Catholic. They were always Catholic, but before Christ dwelt among them to fulfill the prophesies, and it can be explained that Catholics are the true spiritual descendants of Abraham. The (fake) Jєωs mentioned in the article have nothing to do with the 12 Apostles, for they are completely severed from the Faith due to their apostasy. Moreover, they have no biological lineage of David. Once again, you tragically missed the point.

BTNYC · « **Reply #5 on:** November 14, 2014, 08:09:44 AM »

Quote from: poche

All twelve apostles were Jєωιѕн before they were Catholic.

NO-ers get bogged down by these semitic semantics, but it won't fly here.

The blessed Apostles, Our Blessed Lord, His Blessed Mother, St. John the Baptist, St. Joseph, etc. were ethnic Judeans, yes (and I remain unconvinced that there are any genuine members of that race extant today, without any diluting-to-the-point-of-obliteration admixture of Khazar blood)... but they were never "Jєωs" in the modern sense, and never professed the diabolic religion of "Judaism."

They were Catholics after Our Lord established His New Covenant, and they were Catholics before that, inasmuch as they believed in the Faith of the Old Covenant which the Catholic Church is the fulfillment of (and not the тαℓмυdic diabolism of "Judaism").

ClarkSmith · « **Reply #6 on:** November 14, 2014, 09:18:17 AM »

Quote from: poche

Quote from: OHCA
Quote from: poche
If you want to talk about people descended from Jєωs I think we should talk about St Theresa of Avila. She comes from a family of Conversos.

DOWN-THUMB

All twelve apostles were Jєωιѕн before they were Catholic.

The article says that Jєωιѕн faces have changed throughout the centuries due to their wickedness and rejection of Christ. You keep bringing up examples of people that loved Christ.

Croix de Fer · « **Reply #7 on:** November 14, 2014, 12:53:48 PM »

Quote from: BTNYC

Quote from: poche

All twelve apostles were Jєωιѕн before they were Catholic.

NO-ers get bogged down by these semitic semantics, but it won't fly here.

The blessed Apostles, Our Blessed Lord, His Blessed Mother, St. John the Baptist, St. Joseph, etc. were ethnic Judeans, yes (and I remain unconvinced that there are any genuine members of that race extant today, without any diluting-to-the-point-of-obliteration admixture of Khazar blood)... but they were never "Jєωs" in the modern sense, and never professed the diabolic religion of "Judaism."

They were Catholics after Our Lord established His New Covenant, and they were Catholics before that, inasmuch as they believed in the Faith of the Old Covenant which the Catholic Church is the fulfillment of (and not the тαℓмυdic diabolism of "Judaism").

Perfect explanation. This is what I was trying to say.

glaston · « **Reply #8 on:** November 14, 2014, 01:24:00 PM »

Quote from: ascent

LINK

Quote
THE SHOW OF THEIR COUNTENANCE doth witness against them,” said the prophet Isaiah with regard to obdurate Jєωs.

“Thou hast a whore’s forehead,” added the prophet Jeremiah when reproving the Jєωs for their insolence.

Such is the inescapable lot of ’stiff-necked’ Jєωs throughout the centuries whose internal accursedness due to their rejection of Christ manifests itself in their appearance and air.

A notable example is the countenance of Ruth Bader Ginsburg of the Supreme Court.

When in her 40s, Ginsburg, though faintly attractive, bore the marks of discontent and obstinacy with an agenda forming resulting in a war on Christian morality in promoting the perverse sɛҳuąƖ practice of ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity.

Today, any vestige of former attractiveness has been transformed into a hideousness that revolts the eye and turns the stomach.

Many famed Jєωs display a feature that escapes the casual observer. But those with keener eyes perceive subtleties missed by duller sorts.

Given the secular orientation of most Jєωs and their abandonment of things of the Spirit, one can detect in the faces of popular Jєωιѕн figures an appearance that displays a mark of Godlessness.

Such is the look, even a pall of Deathliness, that spreads over the faces of several celebrated Jєωιѕн economists and hucksters.

And what can be said of Jєωιѕн lesbians and ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs?

Not only is any vestige of grace and adornment found in their faces, but rather a sickliness, seediness, and deep-seated ill-health.

Such is the combination of a Christ-denying temper coupled with a perverted sɛҳuąƖ lifestyle.

Woe unto those Jєωs who defy Christ both in stance and practice! A certain foretaste of the lower world spreads over their faces.

WHEN THE JєωS demanded of Pontius Pilate, “Crucify Him! His blood be upon us and upon our children!” they passed on to posterity the “Deicidal Curse”—the imprecation of “blood guilt” for murdering the Eternal Son of God.

The sin of Deicide is not committed with impunity and its characteristic marks are imprinted on its perpetrators.
___________________________________

For More See: Racial Traits Of The Jєωs Click Here

And: The Four Curses On Judaism Click Here

And: A Racial Philosophy Of History Click Here

And: Jєωιѕн Eugenics And The Master Race Click Here

And: The Alien Atmosphere Of The Jєω Click Here

If people are still deceived by faux-Jєω propaganda about Ashke-nαzι - Khazaria connection

Symbolism(as they complete the Satanic takeover) >>>

"Elena Kagan's family background, her education, and how she rose to become the first female solicitor general of the United States"

"Khazaria had two monarchs, at least originally: a kagan (khagan) and a bek."

These are being put in place (& their perverse, lawless, laws) for the next alien-Jєω genocides (esp of Christians)

InfiniteFaith · « **Reply #9 on:** November 16, 2014, 06:27:28 AM »

Theres this Jєω at my new job. I say he is Jєωιѕн because I can tell just by looking at him. Anyways, it seems to me that his face looks satanic. Almost like he is a descendant of the devil or something.

Not to mention, he is loud and obnoxious. He also seems to know things that he shouldn't know.

He is a pest. Just like the rest of them.

BTNYC · « **Reply #10 on:** November 16, 2014, 12:15:14 PM »

While many Jєωs do indeed excel in ugliness, some Jєωesses are beautiful, even stunningly so. Winona Ryder and Scarlett Johansson spring immediately to mind; and when I was a young, unmarried man, unmoored in the sea of secularism, I regarded Natalie Portman to be the most gorgeous creature in Creation... My attraction to her was well beyond the bounds of moderation; I found her to be utterly bewitching (and in hindsight, I think I might mean that adjective in the literal sense).

So I wonder if some of these beautiful Jєωesses might not have been given their inordinate beauty the same way the Jєωs have been given their inordinate wealth and power - namely, by diabolical means and for diabolical ends. When one considers how the Jєωs in the media use these beautiful Jєωesses (including those I mentioned above) to inspire widespread lust - from the very first Hollywood "sex symbol," Theda Bara, to the most famous "sex symbol" in history, Marilyn Monroe, to the Natalie Portmans, Mila Kunises and Scarlett Johanssons of today - the picture becomes clear that the Jєωs have been given these assets for the same reason they've been given their many other assets; namely, to destroy public Faith and Morality, and pave the way for the coming of their Messiah, the Antichrist.

InfiniteFaith · « **Reply #11 on:** November 16, 2014, 01:19:27 PM »

Quote from: InfiniteFaith

Theres this Jєω at my new job. I say he is Jєωιѕн because I can tell just by looking at him. Anyways, it seems to me that his face looks satanic. Almost like he is a descendant of the devil or something.

Not to mention, he is loud and obnoxious. He also seems to know things that he shouldn't know.

He is a pest. Just like the rest of them.

I do feel somewhat remorseful for stating it like this, but I do think there is some truth to my first post here.

OHCA · « **Reply #12 on:** November 16, 2014, 01:34:10 PM »

Quote from: InfiniteFaith

Quote from: InfiniteFaith
Theres this Jєω at my new job. I say he is Jєωιѕн because I can tell just by looking at him. Anyways, it seems to me that his face looks satanic. Almost like he is a descendant of the devil or something.

Not to mention, he is loud and obnoxious. He also seems to know things that he shouldn't know.

He is a pest. Just like the rest of them.

I do feel somewhat remorseful for stating it like this, but I do think there is some truth to my first post here.

Why remorseful?

poche · « **Reply #13 on:** November 16, 2014, 10:42:14 PM »

Quote from: InfiniteFaith

Theres this Jєω at my new job. I say he is Jєωιѕн because I can tell just by looking at him. Anyways, it seems to me that his face looks satanic. Almost like he is a descendant of the devil or something.

Not to mention, he is loud and obnoxious. He also seems to know things that he shouldn't know.

He is a pest. Just like the rest of them.

What if he is really a Catholic?

AlligatorDicax · « **Reply #14 on:** November 17, 2014, 12:26:11 PM »

Quote from: InfiniteFaith (Nov 17, 2014, 7:27 am)

Theres this Jєω at my new job. I say he is Jєωιѕн because I can tell just by looking at him.

Your skills of ethnic recognition must be remarkable indeed, if you can visibly distinguish modern Jєωs from other Semites, especially Arabs (e.g.: Iraqis, Jordanians, "Palestinians").

Or following the Kuzarim hypothesis, reliably distinguish the Jєωιѕн descendants of Turkified Middle-Eastern/Central-Asian Semitic-or-Persian ethnic groups, from nonJєωιѕн descendants from comparable geographic & ethnic backgrounds. Especially after the additional genetic mixing when the Turkomongol hordes overran Biblical S.W. Asia, as far W. as (most of) Anatolia, briefly also holding Antioch, Aleppo, and Damascus in N. Syria.

Quote from: InfiniteFaith (Nov 17, 2014, 7:27 am, continued)

Anyways, it seems to me that his face looks satanic. Almost like he is a descendant of the devil or something.

Can readers conclude that you consider "look[ing] satanic" to be a characteristic unique to Jєωs?  So that harsh description would never be applied to any Muslims? 

Did you think that, e.g., Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, the nonSemitic "Supreme leader of the Islamic Republic of Iran", whether born an ethnic Persian or an Indian Hindu (the latter according to a British conspiracy theory), looked as if he professed a "religion of peace"?  Could anyone find a fur trimmed red suit & cap anywhere that could've made him look the least bit jolly?  Was it a fanatical Shiïte devotion to Allah, or cold-blooded dictatorship--or both--that caused him to order the execution of many thousands of his opponents? I suspect that for Wikipedia to indulge its political correctness favoring him as a "post-colonial leader", it had to lock down the obviously formal portrait it displays near the top of his article. But unless they were going to accept that one being the only photo in the article, they had no choice but to display some of the grim images taken in a photojournalistic style.