Catholic Info

Traditional Catholic Faith => Fighting Errors in the Modern World => Topic started by: WorldsAway on August 04, 2025, 04:52:28 PM

Title: A record-breaking baby has been born from [sic] embryo that’s over 30 years old
Post by: WorldsAway on August 04, 2025, 04:52:28 PM

Quote
A baby boy born over the weekend holds the new record for the “oldest baby.” Thaddeus Daniel Pierce, who arrived on July 26, developed from [sic] an embryo that had been in storage for 30 and a half years.

Full article: https://www.technologyreview.com/2025/07/29/1120769/exclusive-record-breaking-baby-born-embryo-over-30-years-old/

 (https://www.technologyreview.com/2025/07/29/1120769/exclusive-record-breaking-baby-born-embryo-over-30-years-old/)Would the more theologically inclined among us be willing to speculate on what this soul experienced as a frozen embryo for 30 years?
Title: Re: A record-breaking baby has been born from [sic] embryo that’s over 30 years old
Post by: SimpleMan on August 04, 2025, 05:25:31 PM
Full article: https://www.technologyreview.com/2025/07/29/1120769/exclusive-record-breaking-baby-born-embryo-over-30-years-old/

 (https://www.technologyreview.com/2025/07/29/1120769/exclusive-record-breaking-baby-born-embryo-over-30-years-old/)Would the more theologically inclined among us be willing to speculate on what this soul experienced as a frozen embryo for 30 years?
I could probably cause a riot in very conservative Novus Ordo circles by saying this, but there is at least some probability that the soul has not been infused yet.  So far as I am aware, the Church has never traditionally pinpointed an instant at which the soul enters the body, and since we do not know, we must err on the side of caution and assume it is from the moment of conception.  But being cautious and assuming are not the same thing as having absolute certitude.  The most recent catechism uses the term "immediately", which some of the folks of the ilk I describe take and run with, saying "it happens immediately, the soul enters the body at the moment of conception, the Catechism says so!".  But in this case, the world "immediately" (which is translated from Latin) does not mean "right that very second", it means "without the mediation of the parents, but by God alone".  That's a use of the word "immediate" that is not common in English.

All of this said, the dogma of the Immaculate Conception does strongly hint that ensoulment does, in fact, take place at conception.

And if an immortal soul has been infused into this embryo that has been frozen for 30 years, then all I can say is "God's got this".

Title: Re: A record-breaking baby has been born from [sic] embryo that’s over 30 years old
Post by: Miseremini on August 04, 2025, 06:08:30 PM
At conception three are present.  Each parent contributes from their nature and God contributes the spiritual (soul)

Was God present during the mortal sins of IVF ?
Title: Re: A record-breaking baby has been born from [sic] embryo that’s over 30 years old
Post by: Mat183 on August 04, 2025, 06:42:54 PM
This OP brings up some intriguing questions to say the least.  How many embryos do not for whatever reason go beyond the stage of an embryo?  Whatever becomes of all these embryos in the plan of God?  Are these embryos actual human beings or only potentially human beings? What, if anything, does the Catholic Church hold on the matter?

I presented the following question to ChatGPT and got back the following answer:

What is your best estimate of how many embryos never go beyond the stage of embryo, but for whatever reason come to an end on a daily basis world-wide?

ChatGPT said:
Estimating how many embryos never go beyond the early stages of development and come to an end on a daily basis worldwide involves understanding the biological processes behind conception, embryo development, and pregnancy loss. There are several factors at play, including natural causes of early pregnancy loss (spontaneous miscarriage), failed implantation, and natural embryo resorption, among others. Here's how we can break it down:
1. Early Pregnancy Loss (Miscarriage)
2. Failed Implantation
3. Natural Resorption of Embryos
4. Global Estimates: How Many Embryos Are Lost Daily?
To give you a ballpark estimate, we can work through the following assumptions and numbers:
Given the above, a conservative estimate might suggest that between 70,000 and 100,000 embryos worldwide do not survive past the early stages of development (i.e., never progress beyond the embryo stage, either due to failed implantation, early miscarriage, or natural resorption) on any given day. This number can fluctuate depending on the rate of conception, health conditions, and various other factors.
Considerations and Caveats
Summary Estimate
It's important to note that these losses are a normal part of the reproductive process and often go unnoticed because they happen at the very beginning of pregnancy, sometimes before a woman even knows she is pregnant







Title: Re: A record-breaking baby has been born from [sic] embryo that’s over 30 years old
Post by: Miseremini on August 06, 2025, 11:13:17 PM
I could probably cause a riot in very conservative Novus Ordo circles by saying this, but there is at least some probability that the soul has not been infused yet.  So far as I am aware, the Church has never traditionally pinpointed an instant at which the soul enters the body, and since we do not know, we must err on the side of caution and assume it is from the moment of conception.
I too wonder if the soul has been infused into an embryo. 
Has the Church ever defined conception?  Does it mean at the time of fertilization or at the time of implantation?
If it means at the time of fertilization, and the following is true,
  • Rough global estimate: Each day, about 70,000–100,000 embryos may fail to progress beyond the early stages of development worldwide, due to factors like failed implantation, miscarriage, or natural resorption.
that would mean hundreds of millions of souls each year over centuries, never had the chance to be born.  Would God really send a soul that never had a chance?
If on the other hand conception means at the time of implantation, even though things can still go wrong, at least there was a chance of birth.
In our English language when we speak of conceived we invariable mean a fetus which means it's been implanted.
The fertilized egg is like a seed.  It won't grow until it's planted.
These poor frozen embryos are like seeds, it might be more merciful if they didn't have a soul yet... after all is said and done, man through, IVF, had no business constructing them in the first place.
Title: Re: A record-breaking baby has been born from [sic] embryo that’s over 30 years old
Post by: Geremia on August 06, 2025, 11:34:45 PM
Would God really send [sic] a soul that never had a chance?
I think you mean "create" (ex nihilo), not "send". Preexistence of souls is a heresy.
Monsters are frequently conceived, and they must be conditionally baptized ("If you are a human, I baptize…" etc.).
Title: Re: A record-breaking baby has been born from [sic] embryo that’s over 30 years old
Post by: SimpleMan on August 07, 2025, 12:10:05 AM
I too wonder if the soul has been infused into an embryo. 
Has the Church ever defined conception?  Does it mean at the time of fertilization or at the time of implantation?
If it means at the time of fertilization, and the following is true,that would mean hundreds of millions of souls each year over centuries, never had the chance to be born.  Would God really send a soul that never had a chance?
If on the other hand conception means at the time of implantation, even though things can still go wrong, at least there was a chance of birth.
In our English language when we speak of conceived we invariable mean a fetus which means it's been implanted.
The fertilized egg is like a seed.  It won't grow until it's planted.
These poor frozen embryos are like seeds, it might be more merciful if they didn't have a soul yet... after all is said and done, man through, IVF, had no business constructing them in the first place.

Conception is more of a scientific term than a theological one.  It means fertilization, when the new and distinct life is created.  There is nothing magical about implantation that makes this new life any more "human".  

As to the conundrum of whether souls are infused into these very small creatures, we don't know.  Aquinas would have said no, but Aquinas is not the final authority on the matter.  The Church has never defined the moment at which ensoulment takes place.  Again, Novus Ordo types for whom the most recent catechism is the be-all and end-all of Catholicism, and who do not understand the sense in which the word "immediately" is used in the relevant passage, will fight you tooth and toenail insisting that it means "at the moment of conception because the Catechism says so".  They misunderstand the concept.  (See my comments above.)

Surely Our Lord knows which of these embryos are going to be implanted and which ones are not going to be.  It is not outside of His power to refrain from infusing souls into the ones that will never be implanted, but again, we just don't know.