Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: 300 million year old fossils of HUMANS and human tech  (Read 780 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Matthew

  • Mod
  • *****
  • Posts: 31182
  • Reputation: +27095/-494
  • Gender: Male
300 million year old fossils of HUMANS and human tech
« on: November 10, 2018, 09:34:03 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Doesn't fit the mainstream anthropological evolutionist paradigm -- at all.

    P.S. Carbon dating is obviously flawed.

    Logged
    Want to say "thank you"? 
    You can send me a gift from my Amazon wishlist!
    https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

    Paypal donations: matthew@chantcd.com

    Offline cassini

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3294
    • Reputation: +2076/-236
    • Gender: Male
    Re: 300 million year old fossils of HUMANS and human tech
    « Reply #1 on: November 11, 2018, 11:02:16 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
    • My favourite fossil fraud was the skull, reputed to be that of a hominoid, found in a millions of years rock and on display in a museum on human evolution. One day a vet visited the museum and told them they had an elephant's kneecap up as a humanoid skull. The next day it was gone. 
    Logged

    Offline Stanley N

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1208
    • Reputation: +530/-484
    • Gender: Male
    Re: 300 million year old fossils of HUMANS and human tech
    « Reply #2 on: November 11, 2018, 09:13:29 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Since the video does not always say what mainstream science thinks of these items, here are some links.

    1) 300 million year old screw. In this case the video gives the mainstream explanation - fossilized sea creature. I did find articles (eg, Daily Mail) but I couldn't find one I was comfortable linking due to other images on the page.

    2) Meister tracks with trilobite. NCSE says this only looks like a footprint, and quotes someone from the Utah Museum of Natural History at the University of Utah saying part of the rock "spalled off in the form of a footprint".

    https://ncse.com/cej/2/4/tripping-over-trilobite-study-meister-tracks
    http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/paluxy/meister.html

    3) Zapata track. For this to mean anything, it has to be both a genuine footprint, and the geology of the host formation has to be established as old. The first link claims the discoverer and owner of the item has provided no evidence of the geology. While I didn't find much else about this specific footprint, there is a lot written about the Paluxy tracks.

    http://paleo.cc/paluxy/zapata.htm
    http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/paluxy.html

    4) London hammer. Mainstream science apparently thinks it's a modern hammer and the formation is recent.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/London_Hammer
    http://paleo.cc/paluxy/hammer.htm

    5) Cretacious finger. Author of linked page questions whether this is a finger.

    http://paleo.cc/paluxy/finger.htm

    6) Coso artifact. Mainstream science seems to think it's a spark plug, and that it was not in a geode but something formed by oxidation and concretion.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coso_artifact
    https://archyfantasies.com/2012/07/09/the-10-most-not-so-puzzling-ancient-artifacts-the-coso-artifact/
    http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/coso.html
    Logged

    Offline Neil Obstat

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 18177
    • Reputation: +8276/-692
    • Gender: Male
    Re: 300 million year old fossils of HUMANS and human tech
    « Reply #3 on: November 12, 2018, 10:54:30 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • .
    Modern geologists and paleontologists go back and forth with their enormous time guestimates, while they point at each other as corroborating guesses.
    .
    Fortunately we have their written records so we can compare what they're saying now with what they said then.
    .
    Fossils are said to be "millions" of years old BECAUSE that's the age of the rocks in which the fossils were found.
    .
    But go ask the geologist and he'll tell you that the rocks surrounding the fossils are "millions" of years old because that's how old the fossil is.
    .
    What a joke.
    Logged
    .--. .-.-.- ... .-.-.- ..-. --- .-. - .... . -.- .. -. --. -.. --- -- --..-- - .... . .--. --- .-- . .-. .- -. -.. -....- -....- .--- ..- ... - -.- .. -.. -.. .. -. --. .-.-.

    Offline cassini

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3294
    • Reputation: +2076/-236
    • Gender: Male
    Re: 300 million year old fossils of HUMANS and human tech
    « Reply #4 on: November 12, 2018, 12:05:44 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0

    • Dr Walter Libby, who won a Nobel Prize for his discovery of the Carbon-14 dating method, and who thought his discovery would reveal ‘prehistoric’ times, never found any human artefact older than 5,000 years.

    ‘“You read statements in books that such or such a society or archaeological site is 20,000 years old,” he commented, “but we learn rather abruptly that these numbers, these ancient ages, are not known accurately; in fact, it is about the first dynasty of Egypt that the first historical date of any real certainty has been established.”’ [1]


    [1] A. J. White, Radio-Carbon Dating, Cardiff, Wales, 1955, p.10.


    Logged

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 41863
    • Reputation: +23919/-4344
    • Gender: Male
    Re: 300 million year old fossils of HUMANS and human tech
    « Reply #5 on: November 12, 2018, 12:26:25 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: Neil Obstat on November 12, 2018, 10:54:30 AM
    Fossils are said to be "millions" of years old BECAUSE that's the age of the rocks in which the fossils were found.

    But go ask the geologist and he'll tell you that the rocks surrounding the fossils are "millions" of years old because that's how old the fossil is.

    :laugh1: ... you are 100% correct.
    Logged

    Offline Stanley N

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1208
    • Reputation: +530/-484
    • Gender: Male
    Re: 300 million year old fossils of HUMANS and human tech
    « Reply #6 on: November 12, 2018, 08:37:26 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: Neil Obstat on November 12, 2018, 10:54:30 AM
    But go ask the geologist and he'll tell you that the rocks surrounding the fossils are "millions" of years old because that's how old the fossil is.
    .
    The geologic column was figured out before Darwin. It's not circular.
    It's also possible for strata to indicate a fossil age in some cases, and fossils to identify a strata age in other cases, and not have logical problems. 
    Logged
    Pages: [1]
    « previous next »