The United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and recognized leader of the man-made global warming hypothesis, former US Vice President Al Gore, are under attack by more than 1,000 leading international scientists.

The much ballyhooed IPCC 2007 Summary for Policymakers outlining the case for man-made global warming was authored by a total of 52 scientists. Since the publication of that report, attention has shifted to outright fraud perpetrated by some of the leading scientists that tied their careers and their fortunes to the man-made global warming cause.
As the Earth stopped warming and the data no longer supported their extrapolated computer model, some of the scientists began to massage the numbers and change the actual core mathematics that created the final model.

In essence, they perpetrated a hoax.

Back in 2007, 400 dissenting scientists provided a report to the United States Senate calling attention to the fact that despite Mr. Gore's allegations to the contrary, there existed no man-made global "consensus."

By then the issue had become a political football and the darling of many environmental groups and non-profit organizations that had hopped on the band wagon of the climate issue to share a piece of the rapidly growing multibillion dollar pie.

The voices of skeptical scientists continued to grow until it reached a chorus of over 700 in 2009.

Now 300 more have joined the ranks of expert skeptics. Among their number are many who are currently with the UN IPCC or have recently left and are blowing the whistle on the United Nations' alleged continuation of the scam.

Much of the Western media and public education system in Europe and North America support the hypothesis of man-made global warming—this despite the fact that much of the hard science behind it has been proven to be skewed.