I should probably clarify that I don't necessarily disagree with anything in your OP. I merely wonder why such views should be called "right wing" and not simply "Catholic."
If you agree with Rerum Novarum, your views on economic matters are Catholic. Calling them "right wing" might lead someone to infer that they are capitalistic in a neo-con, ʝʊdɛօ-usurious sense.
When I refer to economic views as right-wing it means it is directly juxtaposed to left-wing movements talked about in the OP like liberalism, Marxism, Trotskyism, Social Democracy, etc.
The traditional right-wing views came out of a reaction to the Enlightenment and the French Revolution.
You're quite right to oppose the evil movements you listed above, but I would add laissez-faire capitalism to that list, as it is every bit as materialistic as Marxism, socialism, etc. only where Marxism thrives on men's envy, capitalism thrives on men's avarice.
I'm personally a supporter of Distributism, as it is the
only economic theory specifically designed to be in accord with Catholic teaching. I understand that pro-capitalists (my own brother, for example) find it to be "inefficient" or "difficult" by the super-utilitarian standards of LF Capitalism, but as it treats human beings as ends and not means, I think it the reduction of "efficiency" on an inhuman scale is well worth it.
I think Chesterton might have said of it what he said of the Christian religion itself: "It has not been tried and found difficult, it has been found difficult and left untried."