Author Topic: "Monsignor" Patrick J Perez (Read 44911 times)

Iuvenalis · « **Reply #60 on:** January 12, 2012, 12:04:24 PM »

Quote from: Thorn

btw I've been warned by someone I met only once a couple of years ago after I left his church to be careful, that I'm dealing with a hornet's nest. This person was not smiling & wouldn't explain.

I find this part funny. I myself wouldn't go quite that far. I mean, what on earth is he going to do? Denounce us from his pulpit? Ummm, ok. It's his pulpit.

Am I worried about Our Lady Help of Christians (their parish) NKVD operatives performing a rendition of me into a dark room with a solitary, bare, dangling lightbulb to 'catechize' me with some jumper cables and a rubber hose? C'mon.

He's just a blowhard. He might bloviate me to death, but I withstood his oral Santa Ana winds during his 'homilies' enough before, that I'm not terribly worried.

He is rage-prone, and a control freak, so I wouldn't doubt he'd fulminate and fantasize about having such resources to dispatch, but he doesn't. He probably has a few flying monkeys (wizard of Oz reference) that fancy themselves Trad Black Ops that would practically beg him to assign them to some sort of surveillance, but if I see vans parked too long outside my house I'd be more inclined to offer some cocoa (with the big traditional marshmallows, not the miniature post-conciliar ones) than lose a wink of sleep

I'm sure the person that spoke ominously (and vaguely) was either enjoying the air of tradecraft that goes with ominous, vague warnings, or just referring to the few odd ducks over there that obsess over conspiracy theories (all novel and recent inventions you'd think a traditionalist would be averse to) and think there's actually spies in the pews some weeks. Such people could be (and are!) loose cannons, and can do odd things to wouldbe critics possibly, but again, a terrified loner in a fringe community is nothing to worry about.

I'm not making fun of conspirology, don't get me wrong, I think it is blatant that masonic operatives attacked and continue to attack the Faith and the liturgy. But I do disagree with those who, though well intentioned, slide down the slippery slope of thinking that one, or two, or even three cօռspιʀαcιҽs necessitates belief in nearly every other conspiracy-- 'the paranoid worldview,' which is a form of despair and a trap set by the Enemy...but I digress..
One of my gravest suspicions of "Msgr" Perez is that he foments all this other extra-Catholic paranoia *from the pulpit* (ostensibly speaking with authority!)

Thorn · « **Reply #61 on:** January 12, 2012, 01:39:43 PM »

RonCal - I don't understand the first sentence of your 4:03 post. I don't read the Remnant so I don't know what he wrote. What issue was it? And please 'splain that first sentence.

Iuvenalis - I never once thought about dark rooms with rubber hose and all, so I don't know what all that's about. I do know that he can make life miserable for you in other more subtle ways. The person that warned me I'm quite sure had no thought of cօռspιʀαcιҽs & neither did I. Just dealing with Perez can be torture enough. He can foment stuff not only from the pulpit, but simply by being the authority there & talking 'off the cuff'. I'm not overly worried either but I am guarded ( No, I'm not worried that someone, or even he, will show up at my door & do whatever they do when they show up at your door). I do think that SOMEONE needs to speak up & warn people about him. He has no bishop so who do you go to when you see something wrong? He's the pope.

I also disagree that most at that chapel are SPPX supporters. In the past that probably was true. Some are, but by now most of the people there are ex-NO that have no clue about tradition & that's why they accept him & his nonsense.

s2srea · « **Reply #62 on:** January 12, 2012, 04:30:33 PM »

Thorn, for some reason, I cant find the reference to the Remnant article where Fr Perez attacks +Fama and sedevecantism (even though +Fama isn't a sede, though is sede friendly).

Thorn · « **Reply #63 on:** January 12, 2012, 07:50:36 PM »

I still want to see the Remnant article & will search myself, too. I didn't know exactly what the subject was, but I've already read & heard a speech on youtube of his on sedevacantism given several years ago which I felt was VERY weak & I can't imagine anyone who knows anything being convinced by it. I've never read or heard any attacks on Fr. Fama except that one from the pulpit.

RonCal26 · « **Reply #64 on:** January 12, 2012, 09:43:27 PM »

To find the Fr. Perez article on Google, type in "Most Holy Family Monastery" and "Father Patrick Perez" together and a link should come out describing the "apostasy" of Fr. Perez and Dr. Thomas Droleskey.

Another article is by Dr. Rama Coomaraswamy... type in "Dr. Rama Coomaraswamy" together with "Father Fama" an article written by Dr. Rama should come out where he criticizes Fr. Perez and the Remnant Newspaper's calumnious article against a traditional bishop.