"The Jєωs didn't kill Jesus- crucifixion was a Roman method of execution. The Romans killed Jesus."

I keep hearing this nonsense, mostly from Protestant shabbos goyim, but also from many Catholics. I've also heard it said by Catholics that there was a "Jєωιѕн and Roman plot" to kill Jesus- in an attempt to soften things or somehow apologize for the Jєωs. Talk about grasping at straws! There was no "Roman plot" to kill Jesus- the romans had absolutely no problem with Jesus, at least those who knew of his existence didn't. Romans worshipped so many Gods they wouldn't have cared if Christ claimed to be a God, as the Jєωs accused him of. The ONLY people at the time who ever had a problem with Jesus, were the Jєωs, and they were the only ones who wanted to see him dead. They forced Pilate, through the threat of terrorism(riots), to kill Jesus, to be their shabbos goy. Just like Lehi and the modern "Jєωs" forced the British, through terrorism, to abandon Palestine (Google Lehi, and the King David Hotel especially, if for some reason you are unfamiliar with the long history of Zionist terrorism). Yet every time I hear it, it is never refuted, or if it is, the truth is censored by the ADL and all the JIDF idiots out there. Still, anywhere one sees this nonsense, I think it is best to remind them of a few things:

Then Pilate [a Roman] announced to the chief priests and the crowd [the Jєωs], “I find no basis for a charge against this man.”

Pilate [a Roman] called together the chief priests, the rulers and the people [Jєωs], and said to them, “You [Jєωs] brought me this man as one who was inciting the people to rebellion. I have examined him in your presence and have found no basis for your charges against him. Neither has Herod, for he sent him back to us; as you can see, he has done nothing to deserve death.

When Pilate [a Roman] saw that he was not succeeding at all, but that a riot was breaking out instead, he took water and washed his hands in the sight of the crowd, saying, "I am innocent of this man's blood. Look to it yourselves." And the whole people [Jєωs] said in reply, "His blood be upon us and upon our children."

The Deicides take credit in their filthy "Oral Torah" at the same time they acknowledge they had to connive His execution over the objections of the Romans:

“On Passover Eve they hanged Jesus of Nazareth. And the herald went out before him for forty days: 'Jesus of Nazareth is going out to be stoned because he practiced sorcery, incited [to idol worship] and led Israel astray. Whoever knows an argument in his favor should come and argue on his behalf.' But they did not find an argument in his favor, and they hanged him on Passover Eve ... Jesus ... had close connections with the non-Jєωιѕн authorities, and those authorities were interested in his acquittal. Thus it was necessary to give him all the opportunity to clear himself, so that the justice of his conviction not be challenged ... Was Jesus of Nazareth deserving of a search for an argument in his favor? He was an inciter, and the Torah (lit., "the Merciful") says: ‘You shall not spare, nor shall you conceal him!’” (Babylonian тαℓмυd, Sanhedrin 43a, Steinsaltz edition, Vol XVII, Part III)

The Deicides take credit in their filthy "Oral Torah" at the same time they acknowledge they had to connive His execution over the objections of the Romans:

“On Passover Eve they hanged Jesus of Nazareth. And the herald went out before him for forty days: 'Jesus of Nazareth is going out to be stoned because he practiced sorcery, incited [to idol worship] and led Israel astray. Whoever knows an argument in his favor should come and argue on his behalf.' But they did not find an argument in his favor, and they hanged him on Passover Eve ... Jesus ... had close connections with the non-Jєωιѕн authorities, and those authorities were interested in his acquittal. Thus it was necessary to give him all the opportunity to clear himself, so that the justice of his conviction not be challenged ... Was Jesus of Nazareth deserving of a search for an argument in his favor? He was an inciter, and the Torah (lit., "the Merciful") says: ‘You shall not spare, nor shall you conceal him!’” (Babylonian тαℓмυd, Sanhedrin 43a, Steinsaltz edition, Vol XVII, Part III)

Good to know where that is found. My university library has the complete Babylonian тαℓмυd,this particular volume printed in 1905 ( I still hope to find a pre-1900), and Ive been studying it for a while trying to find exact references for the protestant preachers who teach the religion classes I take for electives. Most have never even heard of the тαℓмυd, they still think the Torah is the only law Jєωs have. The ones we have are difficult to study (I think it is deliberate)- there are no "verse" numbers like in your image.

Quote from: Diego

The Deicides take credit in their filthy "Oral Torah" at the same time they acknowledge they had to connive His execution over the objections of the Romans:

“On Passover Eve they hanged Jesus of Nazareth. And the herald went out before him for forty days: 'Jesus of Nazareth is going out to be stoned because he practiced sorcery, incited [to idol worship] and led Israel astray. Whoever knows an argument in his favor should come and argue on his behalf.' But they did not find an argument in his favor, and they hanged him on Passover Eve ... Jesus ... had close connections with the non-Jєωιѕн authorities, and those authorities were interested in his acquittal. Thus it was necessary to give him all the opportunity to clear himself, so that the justice of his conviction not be challenged ... Was Jesus of Nazareth deserving of a search for an argument in his favor? He was an inciter, and the Torah (lit., "the Merciful") says: ‘You shall not spare, nor shall you conceal him!’” (Babylonian тαℓмυd, Sanhedrin 43a, Steinsaltz edition, Vol XVII, Part III)

Good to know where that is found. My university library has the complete Babylonian тαℓмυd,this particular volume printed in 1905 ( I still hope to find a pre-1900), and Ive been studying it for a while trying to find exact references for the protestant preachers who teach the religion classes I take for electives. Most have never even heard of the тαℓмυd, they still think the Torah is the only law Jєωs have. The ones we have are difficult to study (I think it is deliberate)- there are no "verse" numbers like in your image.

ALERT:  The STEINSALTZ edition began publication in the late 1980's. ALL of the preceding English translations were expurgated. Rabbi Adin Israel Steinsaltz, the translator of his eponymous edition, is a Kabbalist and was the nasi of the reconstituted Sanhedrin. For a time, he filled Caiaphas' shoes. Vernacular тαℓмυd editions have been censored since the Disputations of Paris and Tortosa made their  wicked and understandably inflammatory content widely known. It is only since the ascendency and hegemony of Judaism (ascendency and hegemony that "Archbishop" DiNoia plans to have us deny) that the ѕуηαgσgυє of Satan has felt secure enough to publish such an unexpurgated vernacular edition as the Steinsaltz тαℓмυd. Even so, publication was ceased because, even in these days of abject submission to "Jєωιѕн fables" (Titus 1:14), the uncensored content of the first published tractates so re-awakened and inflamed understanding of what Judaism REALLY teaches (contra the rabbis lying statements about the purported universal magnanimity and benignity of Judaism) as to be dangerous to the safety of the tribal elite, hence even the Steinsaltz is incomplete.

When their "Oral Torah" is incontrovertibly exposed, the rabbis will lie (as if you are surprised by their lying) and feign that the genocidal and misanthropic imprecations are a fringe element, but, contrary to their lies, Master Race theology pervades Judaism.

They even make the outrageous lie that, "Jesus of Nazareth isn't even mentioned in the тαℓмυd."

Christ said to pilate, the deliverer has the greater sin.  And the Jєωs had the scripture and Christ followed it to the letter and the Jєωs rejected the corner stone and still do to this day.

Can you point to anyone other than Our Lady who is not responsible for the death of Christ?