Author Topic: "History of the Jєωs", Paul Johnson (Read 1459 times)

Donachie · « **on:** June 04, 2013, 02:07:42 PM »

I have not read this book, but I read Chaim Potok's "Histoy of the Jєωs" and Max Dimont's history of the Jєωs also. Chaim Potok and Max Dimont are Jєωs, Paul Johnson is not. Paul Johnson is an English Catholic educated by Jesuits.

I was reading parts of Johnson's "Modern Times", and he never mentions that Stalin was a Jєω. Stalin was a Khazar Jєω.

His original name was Joseph David Dhugashvili. Dhugashvili means Jєωison. There are anecdotal accounts of him being visited by his father while he was dictator of the Soviet Union, and his father was Jєωιѕн.

He also had the nickname "Koba", which supposedly referred to the Russian bear, but it does not. "Koba" is a reference to the Jєωιѕн zealot Bar Kokhba who led a rebellion against the Roman legions, and who also was regarded as a messianic figure.

Do you honestly think a Georgian Orthodox would be able to securely run a тαℓмυdic Jєωιѕн killing machine like the Soviet Union? Never. And all with the help of the Jєωιѕн banking empire in America and England? The Soviet Union was internationally bankrolled by New York City, DC, and London. The Jєωs would have killed him. He would not have been in a secure position giving orders to kill so many people in Russia and also fellow Jєωs, unless he was a Jєω.

Stalin was surrounded by Jєωιѕн women his whole life and all his wives and mistresses were Jєωs.

He was marrano who played a weak front as a former "Georgian Orthodox" Christian turned communist "ideologue" ... for gentile fools like Paul Johnson. Stalin was not an "ideologue", but a ruthless тαℓмυdic Khazar Jєω, imo, and few people ever mention this.

"Even the best of the goyim should be killed."

FDR, Churchill, Eisenhower, and LBJ were Jєωs too. Nancy Peℓσѕι is as well, and she plays like she is Italian Catholic. John Kerry is too, and he plays like he is Irish Catholic. I think Joe Biden is also. Check his maternal grandmother and so forth.

People will all shout me down and say i am a parnaoid "αnтι-ѕємιтє", and I see a Jєω under every rock, but that is not me. They may say also i don't have sufficient evidence, that what i am saying is only hearsay, but i have read sufficient evidence about all this, but then later i find the same evidence is well suppressed.

I should have made better records of all the different things relevant to this topic of worldwide crypto-Jєωιѕн infiltration that I have read.

Are there no Catholic historians who have the skills and the courage to write these things down in a decent history book?

Obviously not.

If I called Katie Couric, what would she say?

Do you know, I think she is a Jєω too! So is Jennifer Aniston, and she acts like she is Greek!

JohnAnthonyMarie · « **Reply #1 on:** June 04, 2013, 02:36:39 PM »

You might enjoy a book entitled "The Plot Against The Church" by Maurice Pinay. The first few chapters goes in depth about the Jєωιѕн affiliations of Russian leaders after the Bolshevik Revolution. Even more interesting for myself was the remainder of the book which details historical aspects of modern Judaism.

Donachie · « **Reply #2 on:** June 04, 2013, 11:57:28 PM »

Thanks, my brother has a copy of that book. I've seen it but I haven't read it. I'll borrow it from him.

I'm not obsessed with Jєωs and marranos but proper identification of what's what ... and what's the motivation.

Donachie · « **Reply #3 on:** June 06, 2013, 12:14:38 PM »

I have borrowed a copy of "The Plot Against the Church", and it corroborates what I had discovered from internet sources that are now gone offline.

"During the second world war and from then on up to our present time the Jєωιѕн clique which rules the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, continues to be very numerous, for at the head of thenames stands 'Stalin' himself, who for a long time was regarded as a Georgian of pure descent. But it has been revealed, that he belongs to the Jєωιѕн race; for Dhugashvili (or Djougachvili), which is his [original] surname, means 'son of Djou,' --- Jєωison --- and Djou [also] is a small island in Persia, whither many banished Portuguese "Gypsies" migrated, who later settled in Georgia.

Today it is almost completely proved, that 'Stalin' has Jєωιѕн blood, although he never [officially] confirmed nor denied the rumours, about whihc mutterings began in this direction."

Bernard Hutton: French Magazine "Constellation" No. 167 of March 1962. p.202.

Secondly, "Stalin" was also fond of his nickname "Koba", which is misrepresented as "the bear", i.e. the Russsian bear, to naive Americans and so forth. There is not a Slavic or Russian word for "bear" that is like "Koba", as far as I have been able to discover.

Rather "Koba" is quite like "Kokhba" which is Hebrew/Aramaic for "star". What did the Soviet Union flout but the Red Star? the Red Koba. It was everywhere was it not?

Besides that red star of Lenin, Marx, and Stalin(Koba), there was Bar Kokhba of the second century Jєωιѕн revolt against the Romans. "Bar Kokhba" means "son of the star".

It is also misleadingly said that "Koba" comes from a novel written by a "Georgian" author, and it is denied that it has anything to do with the Hebrew word for "star" or Simon Bar Kokhba.

Give me a break. Here it is in Hebrew: כוכבא

A little тαℓмυd and coffee? can we talk?

"Extermination of the Christians is a necessary sacrifice."
Zohar, Shemoth

"Tob shebbe goyyim harog" - "Even the best of the Goyim (Gentiles) should be killed."
Soferim 15, Rule 10

"Kill the Goyim by any means possible."
Choshen Ha'mishpat 425:50

"If a goy killed a goy or a Jєω he is responsible, but if a Jєω killed a goy he is not responsible."
Tosefta, Aboda Zara, VIII, 5

"That the Jєωιѕн nation is the only nation selected by God, while all the remaining ones are contemptible and hateful.

That all property of other nations belongs to the Jєωιѕн nation, which consequently is entitled to seize upon it without any scruples. An orthodox Jєω is not bound to observe principles of morality towards people of other tribes. He may act contrary to morality, if profitable to himself or to Jєωs in general.

A Jєω may rob a Goy, he may cheat him over a bill, which should not be perceived by him, otherwise the name of God would become dishonoured."
Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat, 348

"When a Jєω has a Gentile in his clutches, another Jєω may go to the same Gentile, lend him money and in turn deceive him, so that the Gentile shall be ruined. For the property of a Gentile, according to our law, belongs to no one, and the first Jєω that passes has full right to seize it."
Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 156

etc., etc., etc.,

Common sense is a primary form of proof in science and logic. It is completely against common sense to imagine that an obscure Georgian Orthodox seminary drop out could sit securely enthroned, giving orders to kill, over an anti-Christian killing scheme like the Soviet Union. If from a more secure and crafty postion, Stalin eliminated some Jєωιѕн rivals, here and there in the course of his career, that only strengthens the case that he was Jєωιѕн.

Jєωιѕн Bolshevik assassins would take orders to kill fellow Jєωιѕн Bolsheviks from a Georgian Orthodox foreskin?

Never.

And big international Jєωιѕн money in DC, New York, and London, and etc., would underwrite an uncircuмcised goy as leader of the Soviet Union?

Never.

Is it not true that the Bolsheviks destroyed many Christian churches but never a ѕуηαgσgυє was touched or harmed by communism?

Churchill affectionately called "Stalin", "Uncle Joe", and Chruchill was a "New York Jєω" himself through his mother Jenny Jerome.

As a politically acceptable court historian, Paul Johnson, an English Catholic, would not touch any of this with a ten foot pole, but it is all true, imo.

And Vatican II?

Napoli · « **Reply #4 on:** June 06, 2013, 06:16:17 PM »

"ѕуηαgσgυє of Satan" is available online in pdf for free. It details the Jєωιѕн plot to control the world. It's all supported with facts which you canlook up.

Capt McQuigg · « **Reply #5 on:** June 07, 2013, 10:25:30 PM »

My opinion only but I think reading Paul Johnson's books is a waste of time.

Time is precious and, frankly, Paul Johnson is barely one step up from reading Catholic Answers.