Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Wrench in the Works of Vocal "Participation"  (Read 2403 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Wrench in the Works of Vocal "Participation"
« on: February 11, 2014, 10:01:43 AM »
Quote from: parentsfortruth
Quote from: Matthew
Quote from: hansel
Better yet, how about the lay people follow along in their Missals and leave the singing as Neil has aptly stated to the professionals in the choir who are following the Director?


I'm sorry, but that is not the mind of the Church.

The Church doesn't think it's "better yet" for the Faithful to read along their missals and leave singing to "the professionals".

That's the beauty of Gregorian Chant -- it doesn't take a music major to sing it. Anyone that can carry a tune can sing it. I'm not a music major myself; I can only learn melodies by ear.

"He who sings prays twice."

St. Pius X had to start a revival of true Gregorian Chant, because Church music had gotten out of hand. Probably too many professionals, too many soloists, too many "performances".

The mind of the Church is for all of us to sing together. Remember, it edifies everyone else present to be part of such a group.

The Church would prefer everyone sings Gregorian chant, rather than a few elite Choir members sing a polyphonic Mass. This "mind of the Church" is what all the old-school SSPX priests were taught -- those under Bishop Williamson. That's what Fr. Timothy Pfeiffer pushed for at our chapel.

So wanting the Faithful to sing and participate is NOT just a European or accordista thing.


I beg to differ, Matthew.

Back in 1903, Pope Saint Pius X put out is "Motu Proprio" called Tra le Sollecitudini. Here's what it says about singing.

http://www.adoremus.org/MotuProprio.html

Quote from:  Pope Saint Pius X Moto Proprio 1903
V. The singers
12. With the exception of the melodies proper to the celebrant at the altar and to the ministers, which must be always sung in Gregorian Chant, and without accompaniment of the organ, all the rest of the liturgical chant belongs to the choir of levites, and, therefore, singers in the church, even when they are laymen, are really taking the place of the ecclesiastical choir. Hence the music rendered by them must, at least for the greater part, retain the character of choral music.

By this it is not to be understood that solos are entirely excluded. But solo singing should never predominate to such an extent as to have the greater part of the liturgical chant executed in that manner; the solo phrase should have the character or hint of a melodic projection (spunto), and be strictly bound up with the rest of the choral composition.

13. On the same principle it follows that singers in church have a real liturgical office, and that therefore women, being incapable of exercising such office, cannot be admitted to form part of the choir. Whenever, then, it is desired to employ the acute voices of sopranos and contraltos, these parts must be taken by boys, according to the most ancient usage of the Church.

14. Finally, only men of known piety and probity of life are to be admitted to form part of the choir of a church, and these men should by their modest and devout bearing during the liturgical functions show that they are worthy of the holy office they exercise. It will also be fitting that singers while singing in church wear the ecclesiastical habit and surplice, and that they be hidden behind gratings when the choir is excessively open to the public gaze.


http://www.adoremus.org/musicaesacrae.html

Pope Pius XII later says in Musicae Sacrae of 1958:

Quote from:  Pope Pius XII in Musicae Sacrae, 1958
74. Where it is impossible to have schools of singers or where there are not enough choir boys, it is allowed that "a group of men and women or girls, located in a place outside the sanctuary set apart for the exclusive use of this group, can sing the liturgical texts at Solemn Mass, as long as the men are completely separated from the women and girls and everything unbecoming is avoided. The Ordinary is bound in conscience in this matter."[26]



This completely solidifies my point. If there were to be singing, the men and women were to be SEPARATED if you couldn't find BOYS for a CHOIR.

Now there is NOTHING in these two encyclicals/motu proprios that say that the congregation should be singing during Mass. I defy you to show me where it says, nay, even where it encourages this practice.

Wrench in the Works of Vocal "Participation"
« Reply #1 on: February 11, 2014, 10:59:10 AM »
Completely insane.


Wrench in the Works of Vocal "Participation"
« Reply #2 on: February 11, 2014, 11:31:12 AM »
Quote from: BitDudeX
Completely insane.


It's completely insane for someone to post an answer just saying "completely insane". What is completely insane?

Wrench in the Works of Vocal "Participation"
« Reply #3 on: February 11, 2014, 11:32:51 AM »
Quote from: bowler
Quote from: BitDudeX
Completely insane.


It's completely insane for someone to post an answer just saying "completely insane". What is completely insane?


Quote

This completely solidifies my point. If there were to be singing, the men and women were to be SEPARATED if you couldn't find BOYS for a CHOIR.

Wrench in the Works of Vocal "Participation"
« Reply #4 on: February 11, 2014, 11:36:37 AM »
The wrench in the works is:

That women were never allowed to sing in a church or to do the prayers out loud. Anyone advocating the congregation vocalizing the mass in common prayer, is missing the elephant in the room. The cause of the demise of the mass into the Novus Ordo is the women taking over the masses and the cause of men leaving the church.