Dr. Chojnowski takes a jab at the Remnant http://radtradthomist.chojnowski.me/2017/09/would-you-be-invited-to-mike-and-chriss.html (http://radtradthomist.chojnowski.me/2017/09/would-you-be-invited-to-mike-and-chriss.html)
We have gotten word from the Remnant, that, "For the first time in history," "a number of bishops as well as representatives of every major traditionalist priestly fraternity in the world...will come together for a weekend conference to discuss united and principled defense of Holy Mother Church."
The conference, scheduled for the last week of October, in the usual venue of the past Fraternity of Saint Peter conferences in past years, has as its keynote speaker --- the one, apparently, leading the discussion is Novus Ordo bishop Athanasius Schneider, some of whose actions and words
From the callmejorgebergolio.blogspot.com
Bishop Athanasius Schneider will save the Church with interreligious dialogue!
“Anything that can bring about a mutual knowledge and respect between religions is a good thing.”
Bp. Athanasius Schneider, 5 July 2009 (http://www.dominicansavrille.us/society-saint-pius-x-visits-prelates/)
(https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-kulFb32Za1c/VSkOqXCtjbI/AAAAAAAAFKE/Uu2dDlHc_lk/s1600/2013-03-18-Mgr-Schneider-rencontre-des-chefs-religieux-au-Kazakhstan.jpg) (http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-kulFb32Za1c/VSkOqXCtjbI/AAAAAAAAFKE/Uu2dDlHc_lk/s1600/2013-03-18-Mgr-Schneider-rencontre-des-chefs-religieux-au-Kazakhstan.jpg)
Schneider with his modernist (http://mauricepinay.blogspot.com/2014/12/modernists-are-really-traditionalists.html) co-religionists
"Let us be grateful to God that Pope Francis has not spoken in the manner that was expected by the media. Up to now, he expresses in all his official homilies the beautiful Catholic doctrine."
Bp. Schneider, 30 May 2014 (http://www.dominicansavrille.us/society-saint-pius-x-visits-prelates/)
Athanasius Schneider wrote in his 2013 article,
"In an interreligious meeting in Kazakhstan, in which I participated, we spoke about the most holy realities of each religion. An Imam said, that for the Muslims the holiest of holy is the book of the Koran in Arabic l and he stressed saying: it would be an act of sacrilege when somebody will dare to touch the Arabic Koran with unwashed hands. Hearing this statement I suddenly was thinking about the scenes of the reception of Holy Communion in hand and without almost any clear sacral sign and surely without immediately preceding washing of the hands, which is the case in the vast majority of the Catholic churches all around the world. " (http://www.catholicculture.org/culture/library/view.cfm?recnum=10185)
A quote from an interview he granted to a French newspaper, Présent, January 10, 2015,
"It is the Vatican II Council that gave a wider understanding of the Mystery of the Church according to the Teaching of the Fathers of the Church […]. Thus, the Church has been seen as “a people made one with the unity of the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit” (Lumen Gentium 4) " (http://www.dominicansavrille.us/society-saint-pius-x-visits-prelates/)
In a Latin Mass Magazine interview,
"Ecuмenism is necessary in order to be in contact with our separated brethren and in order to love them. From the depth of the challenge offered to us by the new paganism, we may and we must collaborate with non-Catholics who seriously wish to defend the revealed Divine Truth and the Natural Law that God created." (http://www.dominicansavrille.us/society-saint-pius-x-visits-prelates/)
This is the keynote speaker. What "principles" will he put forward as the basis for combat for the faith? Which faith? After struggling and fighting for decades for Catholic Tradition, do we need a conference led by a right-wing Modernist to rally the troops? When will the Remnant think-tank get out of their cozy Latin Mass venue within the Modernist church structure ---- which of course can be "forbidden" at any time --- and get into the real trenches where those not worried about money or New Church acceptability have been fighting all along.
In the next article, I want to discuss the basis for the "principled" "resistance" that the Catholic Identity Conference is offering. Is it Ecclesia Dei Adflicta? If that is the case, then your principles are grounded in the excommunication of Archbishop Lefebvre and a completely modernist understanding of Tradition. Aren't we dealing here with the same "Latin Mass" men who accepted the modernist transformation of the struggle for the Catholic Faith --- expressed by the traditional Roman Mass --- into an advocacy for respect for the "sensibilities" of the tiny percentage of "Catholics" who feel attached to "former liturgical practices." If these groups and individuals had actually fought for the Faith without acceptance of heresy "within" the Church then we might not be facing the apostasy foretold by Our Lady at La Salette and in the Third Secret. Face it, we are living the Third Secret. Now what?
Dr. Chojnowski takes a jab at the Remnant http://radtradthomist.chojnowski.me/2017/09/would-you-be-invited-to-mike-and-chriss.html (http://radtradthomist.chojnowski.me/2017/09/would-you-be-invited-to-mike-and-chriss.html)
We have gotten word from the Remnant, that, "For the first time in history," "a number of bishops as well as representatives of every major traditionalist priestly fraternity in the world...will come together for a weekend conference to discuss united and principled defense of Holy Mother Church."
The conference, scheduled for the last week of October, in the usual venue of the past Fraternity of Saint Peter conferences in past years, has as its keynote speaker --- the one, apparently, leading the discussion is Novus Ordo bishop Athanasius Schneider, some of whose actions and words
From the callmejorgebergolio.blogspot.com
Bishop Athanasius Schneider will save the Church with interreligious dialogue!
(https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-kulFb32Za1c/VSkOqXCtjbI/AAAAAAAAFKE/Uu2dDlHc_lk/s1600/2013-03-18-Mgr-Schneider-rencontre-des-chefs-religieux-au-Kazakhstan.jpg) (http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-kulFb32Za1c/VSkOqXCtjbI/AAAAAAAAFKE/Uu2dDlHc_lk/s1600/2013-03-18-Mgr-Schneider-rencontre-des-chefs-religieux-au-Kazakhstan.jpg)
Schneider with his modernist (http://mauricepinay.blogspot.com/2014/12/modernists-are-really-traditionalists.html) co-religionists
Athanasius Schneider wrote in his 2013 article,
A quote from an interview he granted to a French newspaper, Présent, January 10, 2015,
In a Latin Mass Magazine interview,
This is the keynote speaker. What "principles" will he put forward as the basis for combat for the faith? Which faith? After struggling and fighting for decades for Catholic Tradition, do we need a conference led by a right-wing Modernist to rally the troops? When will the Remnant think-tank get out of their cozy Latin Mass venue within the Modernist church structure ---- which of course can be "forbidden" at any time --- and get into the real trenches where those not worried about money or New Church acceptability have been fighting all along.
In the next article, I want to discuss the basis for the "principled" "resistance" that the Catholic Identity Conference is offering. Is it Ecclesia Dei Adflicta? If that is the case, then your principles are grounded in the excommunication of Archbishop Lefebvre and a completely modernist understanding of Tradition. Aren't we dealing here with the same "Latin Mass" men who accepted the modernist transformation of the struggle for the Catholic Faith --- expressed by the traditional Roman Mass --- into an advocacy for respect for the "sensibilities" of the tiny percentage of "Catholics" who feel attached to "former liturgical practices." If these groups and individuals had actually fought for the Faith without acceptance of heresy "within" the Church then we might not be facing the apostasy foretold by Our Lady at La Salette and in the Third Secret. Face it, we are living the Third Secret. Now what?
I was uninvited from their website by "Moanin' Mike", does that count?
Dr. Chojnowski takes a jab at the Remnant http://radtradthomist.chojnowski.me/2017/09/would-you-be-invited-to-mike-and-chriss.html (http://radtradthomist.chojnowski.me/2017/09/would-you-be-invited-to-mike-and-chriss.html)
We have gotten word from the Remnant, that, "For the first time in history," "a number of bishops as well as representatives of every major traditionalist priestly fraternity in the world...will come together for a weekend conference to discuss united and principled defense of Holy Mother Church."
The conference, scheduled for the last week of October, in the usual venue of the past Fraternity of Saint Peter conferences in past years, has as its keynote speaker --- the one, apparently, leading the discussion is Novus Ordo bishop Athanasius Schneider, some of whose actions and words
From the callmejorgebergolio.blogspot.com
Bishop Athanasius Schneider will save the Church with interreligious dialogue!
(https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-kulFb32Za1c/VSkOqXCtjbI/AAAAAAAAFKE/Uu2dDlHc_lk/s1600/2013-03-18-Mgr-Schneider-rencontre-des-chefs-religieux-au-Kazakhstan.jpg) (http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-kulFb32Za1c/VSkOqXCtjbI/AAAAAAAAFKE/Uu2dDlHc_lk/s1600/2013-03-18-Mgr-Schneider-rencontre-des-chefs-religieux-au-Kazakhstan.jpg)
Schneider with his modernist (http://mauricepinay.blogspot.com/2014/12/modernists-are-really-traditionalists.html) co-religionists
Athanasius Schneider wrote in his 2013 article,
A quote from an interview he granted to a French newspaper, Présent, January 10, 2015,
In a Latin Mass Magazine interview,
This is the keynote speaker. What "principles" will he put forward as the basis for combat for the faith? Which faith? After struggling and fighting for decades for Catholic Tradition, do we need a conference led by a right-wing Modernist to rally the troops? When will the Remnant think-tank get out of their cozy Latin Mass venue within the Modernist church structure ---- which of course can be "forbidden" at any time --- and get into the real trenches where those not worried about money or New Church acceptability have been fighting all along.
In the next article, I want to discuss the basis for the "principled" "resistance" that the Catholic Identity Conference is offering. Is it Ecclesia Dei Adflicta? If that is the case, then your principles are grounded in the excommunication of Archbishop Lefebvre and a completely modernist understanding of Tradition. Aren't we dealing here with the same "Latin Mass" men who accepted the modernist transformation of the struggle for the Catholic Faith --- expressed by the traditional Roman Mass --- into an advocacy for respect for the "sensibilities" of the tiny percentage of "Catholics" who feel attached to "former liturgical practices." If these groups and individuals had actually fought for the Faith without acceptance of heresy "within" the Church then we might not be facing the apostasy foretold by Our Lady at La Salette and in the Third Secret. Face it, we are living the Third Secret. Now what?
.
From the above link,
Schneider with his modernist (http://mauricepinay.blogspot.com/2014/12/modernists-are-really-traditionalists.html) co-religionists:
.
Maurice Pinay (https://www.blogger.com/profile/12398411396371959771) said...
Let us also remember that Bp. Williamson invited a Hasidic rabbi to teach SSPX seminarians at Ridgefield, CT while Abp. Lefebvre was still living.
December 11, 2014 at 1:00 AM (http://mauricepinay.blogspot.com/2014/12/modernists-are-really-traditionalists.html?showComment=1418277609282#c3795526737429577294)
.
It keeps saying "The message body was left empty" after I preview the post.
.
Monday, September 11, 2017
The SSPX’s “Child Protection Policy” endorsed masturbation, sodomy, obscenity, pornography, etc... (http://callmejorgebergoglio.blogspot.com/2017/09/the-sspxs-child-protection-policy.html)
🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨 WARNING 🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨
CONTAINS
sɛҳuąƖLY EXPLICIT
&
PERVERTED WRITTEN
CONTENT
🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨 WARNING 🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨
(https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-IfglfQ4or24/WbdausBwetI/AAAAAAAAM7g/hRwwtBc9uZYHJGTWInVpOR9jVGLRh8jvACLcBGAs/s400/smc.png) (https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-IfglfQ4or24/WbdausBwetI/AAAAAAAAM7g/hRwwtBc9uZYHJGTWInVpOR9jVGLRh8jvACLcBGAs/s1600/smc.png)
The FSSPX school in Burghclere, England.
Thanks to George Lydda who made this important matter to known to the general public with a facebook post (https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=499402597088306&set=a.230053707356531.1073741827.100010557096713&type=3&theater) (see below) and to the anonymous reader of Call Me Jorge... who brought it to our attention.
(https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-psAxujUEgEc/WbdFmVFu8tI/AAAAAAAAM5s/Yu8FuTc2xtcRjFAohSABxZsxRg1Y7t59gCLcBGAs/s1600/facebook.png) (https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-psAxujUEgEc/WbdFmVFu8tI/AAAAAAAAM5s/Yu8FuTc2xtcRjFAohSABxZsxRg1Y7t59gCLcBGAs/s1600/facebook.png)
[size={defaultattr}]
The following screenshots are taken from the docuмent, “St. Michael’s School Child Protection Policy, Procedure and Guidance” from Appendix IX (pp. 30-2) posted on Great Britain’s SSPX website which appears to have now been removed. (click here to download the docuмent) (https://uploadfiles.io/j445e) Here's the link to the cached docuмent (http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:OFrgtZV2y-4J:www.sspx.co.uk/sMS%2520CPP%252017.07.16.pdf+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us) from the Great Britain SSPX website. This docuмent is almost identical to docuмents appearing on other schools’ websites in Great Britain such as: St. John the Baptist CE Primary School (https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B0mzr4JOl2khX3pFZGRLN1Q1V0k/preview); Barton Primary School (http://bartonprimaryschool.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Child-Protection-Policy-March-17.pdf); Redlands Primary School (http://redlandsprimaryhants.com/policies/140-child-protection-policy/file); Swanmore College (http://www.swanmore-school.co.uk/child-protection-policy-procedure-and-guidance/); Grayshott C of E Primary School (http://grayshott.hants.sch.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/Child-Protection-policy-2016.pdf); etc... who have all also adopted the Brook sɛҳuąƖ Behaviors Traffic Light Tool. The appendix reads at the top of each page, “All green, amber and red behaviours require some form of attention and response. It is the level of intervention that will vary.”[/size]
.
.
The post continues below with specific captures (screenshots) of the controversial "Appendix IX."
.
Are Mike and Chris going to have reps from the British SSPX to explain this problem they're having?
.
.
Continues..........
.
(https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-ez4mofliaXY/WbdGKTU9wnI/AAAAAAAAM50/xhOV-H39kH8wUTYQnMxy6o_UYuwjzLxdACLcBGAs/s1600/green%2Bbehaviors.png) (https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-ez4mofliaXY/WbdGKTU9wnI/AAAAAAAAM50/xhOV-H39kH8wUTYQnMxy6o_UYuwjzLxdACLcBGAs/s1600/green%2Bbehaviors.png)
For Ages 0 to 5
(https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-0XT-v-mOfrk/WbdGLdntDkI/AAAAAAAAM54/ZfsU3mL-xcMhv-1R_amMVj4I3Banlmm5QCLcBGAs/s1600/0%2Bto%2B5.png) (https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-0XT-v-mOfrk/WbdGLdntDkI/AAAAAAAAM54/ZfsU3mL-xcMhv-1R_amMVj4I3Banlmm5QCLcBGAs/s1600/0%2Bto%2B5.png)
For Ages 5 to 9
(https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-LW7p1gkSIiY/WbdGMuzcr0I/AAAAAAAAM58/0a1g6ygCtHkvJmZDWXNEXrhftHvN6zGiACLcBGAs/s1600/5%2Bto%2B9.png) (https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-LW7p1gkSIiY/WbdGMuzcr0I/AAAAAAAAM58/0a1g6ygCtHkvJmZDWXNEXrhftHvN6zGiACLcBGAs/s1600/5%2Bto%2B9.png)
For Ages 9 to 13
(https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-LgniGllKr-8/WbdGNsQFNpI/AAAAAAAAM6A/6wLl6B-GR38uyjV3M4jpeQEtAZTlMeOXgCLcBGAs/s1600/9%2Bto%2B13.png) (https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-LgniGllKr-8/WbdGNsQFNpI/AAAAAAAAM6A/6wLl6B-GR38uyjV3M4jpeQEtAZTlMeOXgCLcBGAs/s1600/9%2Bto%2B13.png)
For Ages 13 to 17
(https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-iaR0UvvcjRE/WbdGPG_0ufI/AAAAAAAAM6E/4bCtb0eWKdk4OwROmyGZnaHf4JRmXjbYACLcBGAs/s320/13%2Bto%2B17.png) (https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-iaR0UvvcjRE/WbdGPG_0ufI/AAAAAAAAM6E/4bCtb0eWKdk4OwROmyGZnaHf4JRmXjbYACLcBGAs/s1600/13%2Bto%2B17.png)
Absolutely disgusting!
So who’s responsible for St. Michael’s School and the policy docuмent that’s been posted, removed, reposted and removed once again? That would be Fr. John Brucciani, St. Michael’s headmaster, and Fr. Robert Brucciani, the District Superior of Great Britain.
(https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-J4sbYe4rRHU/WbdLsomXM2I/AAAAAAAAM6o/p-0B7aqEJKEaf86jWL6GLpv_NvmXXGc0wCLcBGAs/s400/fr%2Bjohn%2Bbrucciani.png) (https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-J4sbYe4rRHU/WbdLsomXM2I/AAAAAAAAM6o/p-0B7aqEJKEaf86jWL6GLpv_NvmXXGc0wCLcBGAs/s1600/fr%2Bjohn%2Bbrucciani.png)
(https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-o6tfw7ZeKq8/WbdTwLWP-_I/AAAAAAAAM7A/t-eyC4BR4wczLzgnKpE0Ccri9GFLgqqXgCLcBGAs/s1600/phone%2B3.png) (https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-o6tfw7ZeKq8/WbdTwLWP-_I/AAAAAAAAM7A/t-eyC4BR4wczLzgnKpE0Ccri9GFLgqqXgCLcBGAs/s1600/phone%2B3.png)
According to the SSPX website (http://fsspx.uk/en/district-superior-great-britain), Fr. Robert Brucciani’s responsibilities as District Superior include, “the wise pastoral care of the priests, brothers and sisters of his District, together with their priories, schools and chapels, according to the statutes and spirit of the Society.” Why not give the District Superior a call and the headmaster at St. Michael’s and let both of them know how you feel about this on again—off again policy at St. Michael’s? Ask why Fr. Patrick Summers (http://fsspx.uk/en/sms-prospectus) removed the offending material only then to be removed from his job as headmaster and why did the administration under the new headmaster, Fr. John Brucciani, put the morally offending docuмent back up? Point out to them that if they need to have a docuмent such as this to fulfill British law for having a school, perhaps they shouldn’t have a school. Ask them why they ever thought it a good idea to adopt the policy of the pro-abortion (https://www.brook.org.uk/your-life/abortion), pro-ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ (https://www.brook.org.uk/your-life/category/sɛҳuąƖity), sɛҳuąƖly confused (https://www.brook.org.uk/your-life/category/gender), pro-contraception (https://www.brook.org.uk/your-life/category/contraception), Brook in the first place!
.
The last part is really frightening:
.
Excerpt from (https://www.brook.org.uk/about-brook/brook-position-statement-relationships-and-sex-education) Brook’s Position Statement on Relationships and Sex Education:
(https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-BlzybU-JfBI/WbdVRb1KYbI/AAAAAAAAM7M/oqRXPgXTDp48r9K3alEYo0fir16rAgD7ACLcBGAs/s1600/brook.png) (https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-BlzybU-JfBI/WbdVRb1KYbI/AAAAAAAAM7M/oqRXPgXTDp48r9K3alEYo0fir16rAgD7ACLcBGAs/s1600/brook.png)
.
Allowing parents to withdraw children undermines their rights and is incompatible with UN Convention on the Rights of the Child.
.
Any of the great saintly popes of history would have been all over this garbage in a New York minute.
.