As for the women priests, we'll have to take a wait and see approach to it all.
It can never be done officially, at least not right now, but what would stop a new position from being created that would be equal and priestly without referring to it as such?
Since the novus ordites and the novus ordite clergy teach that other faiths have salvific means to them, why be so hung up on something that Pope Saint John Paul the Great wrote back in the day? A pope can rescind the writings of another pope.
The New Mass changed the words of consecration.
The conciliarists changed the rites of consecration for bishops and ordination for priests to better fit the new ecclesiology.
Now, since Pope St. John Paul the Great is a novus ordo pope and saint, maybe his edict will be treated with kid gloves and maybe it will be treated as a historical anomaly to be placed behind a glass and observed as if it were a museum piece.
After all, the novus ordites believe in change more than all that other stuff.
And also, isn't EENS a dogma? It is. I think, anyway. I heard somewhere that EENS was a dogma and in the novus ordo, Feeney is a punchline. The new church has blurred EENS to the point of having no meaning at all so what would stop them from blurring this small rule against women priests?
A pope who says that he doesn't believe in a Catholic God... ...why we he get all scrupulous over women priests?