Author Topic: Women priest??? Coming to a town near you? (Read 6186 times)

Caminus · « **Reply #25 on:** July 05, 2011, 02:19:44 PM »

Quote from: Exilenomore

Such a private decision is not even derived from judging someone's status regarding the Church, but from the fact that a Pope cannot teach evil doctrines.

Making comparisons with the Donatists is not honest either. They refused to receive the repentant lapsi back into the fold. Their error sprung from a lack of mercy.

I suggest you read Augustine's Letters against the Donatists.

TKGS · « **Reply #26 on:** July 05, 2011, 04:18:40 PM »

Quote from: canimus

No my friend, you have erred in your judgment, you have not taken all things sufficiently into account in making your determination. It makes "sense" to you based on your very limited knowledge and that pure subjectivism.

I admit my knowledge is limited. At one time I was content in the conservative wing of the Novus Ordo, going to Mass once in a while, enjoying my Sundays off, believing that the Catholic religion was really just too complicated for the ordinary layman to understand since, in 12 years of relgious education all I really knew was that God loves me. (I do not exaggerate.) My downfall was reading the Roman Catechism I happened to find in a bookstore overseas because I thought I should probably find out a little about the religion since the Protestant Evangelicals were telling me that the Catholic religion is the "whore of Babylon". I was shocked to discover that not only was the religion pretty darn simple, but it made perfect sense. Since truly discovering Catholicism, my days in the conciliar religion were numbered.

It is not my subjectivism that causes the Vatican, cardinals, popes, and bishops to routinely support and defend heretical doctrines and objective evils. What they do is available for all the world to see and the Fathers of the Church would have long ago excommunicated them. The real problem today is that few bishops will act according to the example of St. Athanasius and St. Basil. The SSPX, for example, wishes instead to claim that they take the "prudent" course by refusing communion in practice while denying that they do so in word.

I am willing to accept the possibility of error on my part. But I only say what the SSPX does, so I do not think my judgment on the matter is the problem.

ServusSpiritusSancti · « **Reply #27 on:** July 05, 2011, 04:19:06 PM »

Quote from: Telesphorus

Learn to read.

What was that you said a few weeks ago about being more charitable to me?

Quote

There's only one Church SS.

Correct, there is only one Catholic Church. I'm saying that a counter-fit church does exist as well. You don't think the Vatican II church is a counter-fit church?

MyrnaM · « **Reply #28 on:** July 06, 2011, 08:38:30 AM »

video for interested Catholics:

http://www.youtube.com/user/10WiseVirgins

TraceG · « **Reply #29 on:** July 06, 2011, 07:42:03 PM »

Quote from: TKGS

One thing is for certain: When the conciliar church begins ordaining women, there will be women bishops very soon after and the Vatican will simply not be able to resist appointing women as cardinals (the first will probably be in charge of the Congregation for the Clergy) and I am absolutely confident that the first conclave that includes women cardinals will elect one of them as pope; probably on the first ballot.

And, in case you're asking, the very same people who defend the women priests will demand that we accept a woman pope, or would that be a "popess"?

And not one act they do will be valid or licit, none.