Prayerful - Perhaps I should not call the 1965 litrugy a golden bridge. But, the reason I do is that in tradition, it is taboo for anyone other than the pope to alter the liturgy. The coined and derogatory "liturgy of Econe" term is one that comes to mind. So, trads pick a liturgical date and stick by it through thick and thin. This is a limiting factor when it comes to considering solutions. So, for this reason I see the 1965 liturgy as a realistic option, and therefore favor it.
And, when I see the 1965 liturgy, I see a liturgy that can be celebrated in "full" conformity with tradition. However, I also see it as a liturgy that can be "doubtfully" celebrated in conformity with tradition. But, the proof is in the pudding. And, I see it only as a negative doubt. Because, the church received this liturgy and +Lefebvre did not rebel against it until many years later. I think it wasn't until the 1980s that +lefebvre settled on the 1962. And, I suspect from what I see now concerning the taboo of picking of choosing that is so evident, that +Lefebvres "liturgy of Econe" in the early days(1970-80)was celebrated in full conformity with the rubrics of 1965-68.
Now, this is important. Because, when I compare that with the NO. I do not see it as a liturgy that can be celebrated in "full" conformity with tradition. And, this is viewed from the eyes of an informed layman in the year 2017. Because, when I view the big picture, I cannot fail to see that two bishops of the church(one an archbishop) refused obedience and altered the course of the church in favor of the survival of the traditional 1962 rite. And, to me, this means that the holy ghost will not allow the lofty changes of the 1969 liturgy to dominate the church's worship for reasons that are irrelevant to this conversation. Because, the point is, that I am not living in the past, and neither should traditionalists. The catholic church has a head, and that head is the papacy. And, that church has 4 marks, and one of them is that she is to be holy. And, catholics are seriously divided as to whether our head is holy or not. So, lets focus on and fix that at all reasonable and acceptable costs.