CathInfo.com

Impressive is too much of a subjective abstraction to take into consideration. 

A Catholic should always ask if their Priests and Bishops are extolling and teaching the truth, as in the Catholic Truth. 

A Catholic should always ask himself if he is following the Last Four Things. 

A Catholic should always ensure that he is in a state of Sanctifying Grace.

What impresses me may bore you and bewilder another man so impressive is a poor guide for the soul.

I just discovered this thread started by ggreg over on SuscipeDomine this past September.

This made me laugh.  Discovered at the other place.

When discerning whether to jump to sedevacantism, one has to get one's priorities straight.

"One thing I've noticed about sedevacantists is that they don't appear to [be] less Judaized than other traditional Catholic groups. One of the striking signs I'd think one would find among the true remnant of Catholics would be a pronounced anti-Jєωιѕнness that sets them apart".

He's quoting me from this thread. He thinks the h0Ɩ0cαųst happened:

Ches[tertonian] and Jayne.  You think these morons wouldn't be pushing you into the showers in 1944, think again.

These are just the sort of useful idiots that the SS hired to do the job.  Quote any old saint of your choosing at them and that is about as deep as they will think it through.

There's only one person on that thread who has the right response, and that is VetusOrdo, he of many faces:

There's nothing wrong with that quote.

At least, on a historical level. Anti-Jєωιѕн sentiment has been an integral part of Christianity, East and West.

I also notice that JayneK lies about me and says I keep a file on her (not that this would be wrong, but I don't):

The poster you quoted in the OP has such distinct and unusual views that I knew precisely who had written it, even though you had not identified him.  The vast majority of members here, and even on Cathinfo, see me as their sister in Christ and would pose no danger to me whatsoever.  You quoted a single individual, so obsessed with Jews and Judaism that he keeps a file on me to keep track of my "incriminating" posts.  I would be very surprised if there is anyone else like this.

What a lying unconverted Jew snake she is. This is a woman who once said that anti-Jєωιѕнness has nothing to do with Catholicism, but had to backtrack. She was later an apologist for VoxClamantis' homo and tranny promotion. No, I don't keep a file on anyone on these forums, it just so happens that I've been reading these forums since 2006 or so and develop views on people from reading lots of posts. She lied about me another time and said I followed her to this forum, when I'd been here years before she came.

JayneK's response to VetusOrdo:

The words, in themselves, are reasonable enough.  Any problems come from the context and poster history.

VetusOrdo again:

Any problems come from the notion of Jєωιѕн exceptionalism.

No greater sin has ever befallen this earth than Jєωιѕн pride.

Having looked at the evidence I am convinced that the h0Ɩ0cαųst happened.

Whether it was 4 or 6 million or the exact number killed who knows?  The nαzιs destroyed all the evidence they could, how would you add up an exact number without records?

But the evidence remaining that there was a deliberate and systematic slaughter of the cσncєnтrαтισn cαмρ inmates, who were mostly Jews is undeniable.  I have personally met two British soldiers who actually liberated some of those camps when I was in my early 20s buying and selling cars in London.   I don't believe they were lying, nor do I believe the survivors are all lying either.  Do some of them exaggerate a bit?  Yes, I am sure they do.  But they are not making the whole thing up.   You have to be very biased to look at the evidence and conclude that.

People deny all sorts of things.  Moon landings, round earth, heliocentrism and they simply do it by selectively viewing the evidence or claiming that 400,000 people working for NASA kept a giant secret.  But that is nuts.  By that yardstick you cannot trust ANYTHING historical.  Take anything in history and you could take a one-sided view.

There are people who claim there is no historical evidence for Jesus.  But the truth is that what evidence there is they reject because they wish to reject it, whereas they have never doubted the existence of Genghis Khan or Marco Polo.

Show me someone who likes the Jews but denies that the h0Ɩ0cαųst happened.