Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Why Arent Sedevacantists more impressive?  (Read 43202 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Why Arent Sedevacantists more impressive?
« Reply #90 on: October 18, 2015, 08:21:58 PM »
Quote from: rum

As far as JayneK is concerned, she's hardly my ally. I called her out for her Judaizing long before anyone else, to my knowledge, noticed it. Most of the dislike of her was due to her anti-feminism and her mini-modding. She said on the thread I link to here that one who is anti-Jєωιѕн is not Catholic: http://tedeum.boards.net/post/26382/thread

She later retracted this bald-faced lie, but I suspect more out of necessity than because she wanted to. The fact that she asks in puzzlement on this thread why I focus so much on Jews is a sign that she has yet to fully free herself of the тαℓмυdism of her ancestor Vilna Gaon.


Obviously, I am not going to immediately become a well-formed Catholic after 30 years in the Novus Ordo.  I need things explained.

I really don't understand why you (or anybody) thinks Judaizing is the worse problem in the Church.  Doesn't Judaizing just mean saying that Christianity should include Jєωιѕн practices or that Judaism is a saving faith?  Of course, those are serious errors, but there are so many other serious errors around now.  How does Judaizing force modernism onto people?

Why Arent Sedevacantists more impressive?
« Reply #91 on: October 18, 2015, 08:24:47 PM »
Quote from: Jaynek
Quote from: rum

As far as JayneK is concerned, she's hardly my ally. I called her out for her Judaizing long before anyone else, to my knowledge, noticed it. Most of the dislike of her was due to her anti-feminism and her mini-modding. She said on the thread I link to here that one who is anti-Jєωιѕн is not Catholic: http://tedeum.boards.net/post/26382/thread

She later retracted this bald-faced lie, but I suspect more out of necessity than because she wanted to. The fact that she asks in puzzlement on this thread why I focus so much on Jews is a sign that she has yet to fully free herself of the тαℓмυdism of her ancestor Vilna Gaon.


Obviously, I am not going to immediately become a well-formed Catholic after 30 years in the Novus Ordo.  I need things explained.

I really don't understand why you (or anybody) thinks Judaizing is the worse problem in the Church.  Doesn't Judaizing just mean saying that Christianity should include Jєωιѕн practices or that Judaism is a saving faith?  Of course, those are serious errors, but there are so many other serious errors around now.  How does Judaizing force modernism onto people?

I believe the most common heresy in the Church today is the belief that Jews can be saved without believing in Christ and without baptism. I believe the reason for this is because the Jєωιѕн and Freemasonic powers took control of the Vatican and the Novus Ordo sect and now guide what its members believe.


Why Arent Sedevacantists more impressive?
« Reply #92 on: October 19, 2015, 04:55:13 AM »
Quote from: Matto

I believe the most common heresy in the Church today is the belief that Jews can be saved without believing in Christ and without baptism. I believe the reason for this is because the Jєωιѕн and Freemasonic powers took control of the Vatican and the Novus Ordo sect and now guide what its members believe.


OK, I can see that this is a very common heresy and that it is seriously wrong.  That is straightforward enough. And I can tell that there has not been a clear statement from the Vatican correcting this error since V2.  Everything from the Vatican has made it worse. It is all the underlying connections that I find difficult to grasp.  Could you (or somebody) recommend something for me to read about this?  Preferably something online.

Why Arent Sedevacantists more impressive?
« Reply #93 on: October 19, 2015, 05:23:49 AM »
Quote from: voxxpopulisuxx
Quote from: Jaynek
Quote from: voxxpopulisuxx
Oh and as a matter of fact you DID get to defend yourself to the ADMIN SBYVL the rightful judge of any defense since it is his forum. Further did you ever wonder why making TeDeum a "jayne free zone" created an instant desire for many new members? It seems my dear arch enemy I am more tolerable than you.


I don't want to be your enemy.

You have a funny way of showing it...lol


Voxx, while you have your good qualities, one of your greatest weaknesses is that you are bad at handling criticism or disagreement.  You have a tendency to take even mild disagreement or constructive criticism as a declaration of war.  People are not your enemies just because they think that you have faults or think that some of your ideas are wrong.

I suspect this is why rum has noticed that being a moderator has been bad for your character.  Your belief that criticism/disagreement = enemy does not combine well with the   powers of a moderator.

Not too long ago, somebody made a dig at you on Suscipe Domine and I was the first one to come to your defense:
Quote from: Jaynek on SD

Quote
Frankly, I am glad this guy got permanently banned. He is of the eastern rite, and this response of his shows infection with a schismatic orthodox mentality that the pope is not so important. He is "VoxPopuli..." now on the tedeum forum.


I object, in general, to making a comment like this about a person who is not here to defend himself.  Voxxpop did not say anything wrong here. There is nothing at all schismatic about making a distinction between the person of the pope and the office of papacy.  On the contrary, considering how our culture suffers from the cult of personality, it is a very useful distinction.


I stood up for you when somebody tried to question your Catholicism because there were no grounds for such an accusation and because you were not there to defend yourself.  I am criticizing you in this thread to your face where you can respond to it.  I do not think that you are a very good moderator.  That does not make me your enemy.  It also does not make me rum's ally.  (From what I can tell, he can't stand me.)

Why Arent Sedevacantists more impressive?
« Reply #94 on: October 19, 2015, 07:25:19 AM »
Quote from: Jaynek
Quote from: OHCA
Quote from: Jaynek
As I understand rum's posts in this thread, the qualities that impress him are opposition to Judaizing and to PCness.  It seems strange to me that he is so specific.

I am impressed by opposition to and hatred of heresy in general.  It seems odd to single out one particular heresy to focus on like this.  All heresy is great evil.

Being PC is just one form of muddled thinking.  I am impressed by clear thinking, but again, I find it odd to focus on just one particular way of failing to think clearly.


Judaization & PCness are primary methods that the powers that be (freemasons & jews) are forcing modernism (the synthesis of all heresies) and the NWO onto us.  Judaization & PCness quite possibly are the greatest evils we face today (rather than lonely people & teenagers w/o after school jobs as one knuckle-head has said).


Obviously judaizing and PCness are serious problems, but what about secularism, relativism, ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖism, etc.?  There just seem to be so many things wrong (far worse things than loneliness and youth unemployment) I don't get narrowing it down to just those two things that rum does.


PCness is the mechanism by which ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity is now widespread and we have been forced to accept sodomite marriage whereas previously there were a few fαɢɢօts here and there and they largely stayed in the closet.  Also, PCness penalizes (formally or informally) stigmatization of a host of other sins & debauchery.

Btw--I didn't downthumb you.