Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Why Arent Sedevacantists more impressive?  (Read 43176 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Why Arent Sedevacantists more impressive?
« Reply #95 on: October 19, 2015, 07:51:22 AM »
Quote from: Jaynek
Doesn't Judaizing just mean saying that Christianity should include Jєωιѕн practices or that Judaism is a saving faith?


Judaized also means being influenced by the jew machinery whether in the religion, entertainment, politics, education, media, etc.  The control of the jew machinery, and the masses being so heavily influenced by it (judaized), whether wittingly or unwittingly, is the reason the world is a big $#!+hole today.

Why Arent Sedevacantists more impressive?
« Reply #96 on: October 19, 2015, 07:55:48 AM »
Quote from: Jaynek
Quote from: voxxpopulisuxx
Quote from: Jaynek
Quote from: voxxpopulisuxx
Oh and as a matter of fact you DID get to defend yourself to the ADMIN SBYVL the rightful judge of any defense since it is his forum. Further did you ever wonder why making TeDeum a "jayne free zone" created an instant desire for many new members? It seems my dear arch enemy I am more tolerable than you.


I don't want to be your enemy.

You have a funny way of showing it...lol


Voxx, while you have your good qualities, one of your greatest weaknesses is that you are bad at handling criticism or disagreement.  You have a tendency to take even mild disagreement or constructive criticism as a declaration of war.  People are not your enemies just because they think that you have faults or think that some of your ideas are wrong.

I suspect this is why rum has noticed that being a moderator has been bad for your character.  Your belief that criticism/disagreement = enemy does not combine well with the   powers of a moderator.

Not too long ago, somebody made a dig at you on Suscipe Domine and I was the first one to come to your defense:
Quote from: Jaynek on SD

Quote
Frankly, I am glad this guy got permanently banned. He is of the eastern rite, and this response of his shows infection with a schismatic orthodox mentality that the pope is not so important. He is "VoxPopuli..." now on the tedeum forum.


I object, in general, to making a comment like this about a person who is not here to defend himself.  Voxxpop did not say anything wrong here. There is nothing at all schismatic about making a distinction between the person of the pope and the office of papacy.  On the contrary, considering how our culture suffers from the cult of personality, it is a very useful distinction.


I stood up for you when somebody tried to question your Catholicism because there were no grounds for such an accusation and because you were not there to defend yourself.  I am criticizing you in this thread to your face where you can respond to it.  I do not think that you are a very good moderator.  That does not make me your enemy.  It also does not make me rum's ally.  (From what I can tell, he can't stand me.)


Very well-stated.  He is hyper sensitive and incredibly defensive seeing attacks where none have been launched.  He seems unbalanced and he resorts to underhanded tactics against anyone who has put him in a true light.  But what is worse is he cannot take constructive criticism.  For him it is a contest on who can hurt the other worst or appear to have gotten the best and last word.  This is fun for him on the other site because he can just lock threads and ban people willy-nilly and he does.  Many of the best seds left that site because of him some time ago and several on there now do not like his tactics but deal with it because if they get banned they cannot even lurk on that site as a guest to see what the sane people there might be posting.  

The good thing about this thread is we may be improving te deum now as his pride forces him to defend himself here by launching counter-attacks and pretending to be in the right about anything and everything no matter how wrong he is.  His name implies that he thinks the voice of the common people sucks, this may explain why he locks everything and bans people he does not understand or who have pointed out his inconsistencies.  

He needs prayers, because humanly speaking it does not seem like his pride will allow him to benefit from the criticism.  In group PMs he is even more petty than in public.  But he will not admit the facts but just angrily lash out hurling any accusations he can think of hoping they will stick or imply something negative hoping people will come to gross conclusions  as when he talks about my "obsession" with Griff.  At first I could not believe he was as bad he seemed to be, but ultimately I found out he is even worse.  But don't dare try to subtlety imply this to him or you will unleash a fury like you have never seen before.  

Sbvilis many times will not respond to PMs and can be petty in the private PMs as well and he is also the type that cannot handle his authority well but he is not as bad a Vox and he doesn't become as unhinged and rattled as easily as Vox.  Neither are good moderators by any stretch by Vox is absolutely terrible.  It would be good if he could bring himself to accept that there is truth the accusation and lighten up a bit and quit taking himself so seriously.  But he won't.  This post might start another rampage to satisfy his pride.  :popcorn:



Why Arent Sedevacantists more impressive?
« Reply #97 on: October 19, 2015, 07:57:08 AM »
JayneK,
I hope your just naive and sincerely trying to learn.  But I am suspicious that you, of all people, seem very concerned about criticism of judaization.  Perhaps you're playing the passive-aggressive "I just don't get it" hoping that'll cause others to doubt it too.  I haven't down thumbed you in this thread yet.  But I certainly don't get your cheerleader up-thumber though.

Why Arent Sedevacantists more impressive?
« Reply #98 on: October 19, 2015, 10:35:30 AM »
Quote from: OHCA
Quote from: Jaynek
Quote from: OHCA
Quote from: Jaynek
As I understand rum's posts in this thread, the qualities that impress him are opposition to Judaizing and to PCness.  It seems strange to me that he is so specific.

I am impressed by opposition to and hatred of heresy in general.  It seems odd to single out one particular heresy to focus on like this.  All heresy is great evil.

Being PC is just one form of muddled thinking.  I am impressed by clear thinking, but again, I find it odd to focus on just one particular way of failing to think clearly.


Judaization & PCness are primary methods that the powers that be (freemasons & jews) are forcing modernism (the synthesis of all heresies) and the NWO onto us.  Judaization & PCness quite possibly are the greatest evils we face today (rather than lonely people & teenagers w/o after school jobs as one knuckle-head has said).


Obviously judaizing and PCness are serious problems, but what about secularism, relativism, ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖism, etc.?  There just seem to be so many things wrong (far worse things than loneliness and youth unemployment) I don't get narrowing it down to just those two things that rum does.


PCness is the mechanism by which ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity is now widespread and we have been forced to accept sodomite marriage whereas previously there were a few fαɢɢօts here and there and they largely stayed in the closet.  Also, PCness penalizes (formally or informally) stigmatization of a host of other sins & debauchery.

Btw--I didn't downthumb you.


I see that I did not properly understood what was meant by PCness.  If it includes things like that, then it makes sense to treat it a super serious.  Thanks for the explanation.

Why Arent Sedevacantists more impressive?
« Reply #99 on: October 19, 2015, 10:41:44 AM »
Quote from: OHCA
Quote from: Jaynek
Doesn't Judaizing just mean saying that Christianity should include Jєωιѕн practices or that Judaism is a saving faith?


Judaized also means being influenced by the jew machinery whether in the religion, entertainment, politics, education, media, etc.  The control of the jew machinery, and the masses being so heavily influenced by it (judaized), whether wittingly or unwittingly, is the reason the world is a big $#!+hole today.


This is a really helpful definition for me.  I understand about how bad this stuff is and how it is connected to modernism.  No wonder people are making a big deal about it.  Thanks.