Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Why Arent Sedevacantists more impressive?  (Read 31446 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline 2Vermont

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10051
  • Reputation: +5251/-916
  • Gender: Female
Why Arent Sedevacantists more impressive?
« Reply #15 on: September 26, 2015, 05:51:02 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Matto
    Quote from: TKGS
    This is amusing.  

    rum complains that sedevacantists aren't "impressive" enough while Matto complains that they aren't "humble" enough.  We're damned if we do and we're damned if we don't.

    rum:  You've been a member now for 6 days and you've already sized up the sedevacantists on the forum a great deal.  Now that's impressive.

    If it makes you feel any better, I wasn't thinking of you when I made my post, but I believe it to be true for many sedevacantists, especially those with an internet presence. And rum used to post here for a while under a different name so he isn't really a new member.


    Mod edit: CathInfo is NOT a sedevacantist forum. You speak for yourself! Only I can speak for the forum.


    Then who were you thinking of?  I mean, you are on a sede forum.  Are most of us there what you were thinking of ? And if not, exactly where do you come up with this conclusion?  
     
    For there shall arise false Christs and false prophets, and shall shew great signs and wonders, insomuch as to deceive (if possible) even the elect. (Matthew 24:24)


    Offline 2Vermont

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 10051
    • Reputation: +5251/-916
    • Gender: Female
    Why Arent Sedevacantists more impressive?
    « Reply #16 on: September 26, 2015, 06:02:52 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: AMDGJMJ

    The BEST traditional Catholics whom I have ever known were humble "sedes" and members of the "Resistance" who believed their position, but did not proudly or stubbornly force it upon others.

    It is these people who do not tell other people that they can only attend Mass in one particular group.


    _______________________________________



    In  my internet travels these are the sedevacantists I have come to know (even before I decided on the SV position).  That's why I'm confused when Matto seems to think that most sedes are not this way.
    For there shall arise false Christs and false prophets, and shall shew great signs and wonders, insomuch as to deceive (if possible) even the elect. (Matthew 24:24)


    Offline AMDGJMJ

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2692
    • Reputation: +1544/-64
    • Gender: Female
    Why Arent Sedevacantists more impressive?
    « Reply #17 on: September 26, 2015, 06:38:45 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: TKGS
    Quote from: AMDGJMJ
    And these three faults are what make it so that sedes are not more united; in fact, it is the reason why traditional Catholics in general are not more united.


    Actually, the faults you describe are faults that have been a problem in the human race since...Adam.

    The most evident reason why traditional Catholics in general are not more united is because there is no uniting force at this time.  In other words, the lack of unity seen among Catholics is, itself, a sign that there is no pope at the moment to unite Catholics.


    I absolutely agree!  In fact...  They have been the primary cause of all evil since the rebellion of the fallen angels.

    If mankind was not so stubborn, selfish or proud...  The Church would probably still be in tact with a full running hierarchy.  It is due to our sins and lack of prayer and penance in making atonement that we have deserved this crisis in the world...
    "Jesus, Meek and Humble of Heart, make my heart like unto Thine!"

    http://whoshallfindavaliantwoman.blogspot.com/

    Offline AMDGJMJ

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2692
    • Reputation: +1544/-64
    • Gender: Female
    Why Arent Sedevacantists more impressive?
    « Reply #18 on: September 26, 2015, 06:42:16 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Lighthouse
    Do you know what a straw man is?  You have made statements you can't prove and then pretended that you had proved them and refuted them.

    If you do not want to dispute the sede position (I know I don't), then your have made proclamations that are not much help to anybody.  


    I think that, perhaps, Rum wants to have something to believe in.  Which of us does not?

    I could be wrong, but it seems that Rum is more inclined to the sede position, and wants a reason to accept it.  Yet, he is saying that most sedes whom he has met are too pushy, stuck-up, and uncharitable, and this turns him away a bit...

    "Jesus, Meek and Humble of Heart, make my heart like unto Thine!"

    http://whoshallfindavaliantwoman.blogspot.com/

    Offline AMDGJMJ

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2692
    • Reputation: +1544/-64
    • Gender: Female
    Why Arent Sedevacantists more impressive?
    « Reply #19 on: September 26, 2015, 06:44:39 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: rum
    I never said I could prove that sedes are as likely to be Judaized and infected with political correctness as trads in other groups. I could prove that some of them are, but I don't think I could (or would want to) prove that the same percentage in every trad group have these flaws.

    It would be nice, to those of us who are confused, if there were clearer markers. Perhaps it was a mistake to mention sedes. I could have just said that I notice that every trad group has bad eggs, which makes deciding which one has the best explanation for the crisis more difficult. Those with knowledge of theology (or think they do) seem to be more confident in their positions.


    I have felt this way many times...

    And I think that just about every honest traditional Catholic wishes that everything was more simple, clear, and easy...

    We must keep fighting, praying, and hoping that God will restore Christendom.

    Only He can accomplish this.  Yet, it is through the prayers and sacrifices of mankind that this will be achieved.
    "Jesus, Meek and Humble of Heart, make my heart like unto Thine!"

    http://whoshallfindavaliantwoman.blogspot.com/


    Offline TKGS

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 5767
    • Reputation: +4620/-480
    • Gender: Male
    Why Arent Sedevacantists more impressive?
    « Reply #20 on: September 26, 2015, 06:45:12 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: rum
    All  trad groups are about equally impressive/unimpressive when it comes to members infected with PC ideas and Judaized.


    Then why just bring up sedevacantists if you think sedevacantists are on the same level as the SSPX, R&R, etc.?  

    Offline AMDGJMJ

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2692
    • Reputation: +1544/-64
    • Gender: Female
    Why Arent Sedevacantists more impressive?
    « Reply #21 on: September 26, 2015, 06:46:29 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: clare
    Quote from: TKGS
    This is amusing.  

    rum complains that sedevacantists aren't "impressive" enough while Matto complains that they aren't "humble" enough.  We're damned if we do and we're damned if we don't.

    The saints were humble and impressive.



    So, let this then become our goal...

    To become the humble and impressive traditional Catholic saints that we wish we could see in everyone else!  
    "Jesus, Meek and Humble of Heart, make my heart like unto Thine!"

    http://whoshallfindavaliantwoman.blogspot.com/

    Offline clare

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2270
    • Reputation: +889/-38
    • Gender: Female
      • h
    Why Arent Sedevacantists more impressive?
    « Reply #22 on: September 26, 2015, 07:11:23 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: AMDGJMJ
    I could be wrong, but it seems that Rum is more inclined to the sede position, and wants a reason to accept it.  Yet, he is saying that most sedes whom he has met are too pushy, stuck-up, and uncharitable, and this turns him away a bit...

    No, it's because they're all Judaized and PC! If they were only pushy, stuck-up and uncharitable they'd be fine!


    Offline songbird

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 4670
    • Reputation: +1765/-353
    • Gender: Female
    Why Arent Sedevacantists more impressive?
    « Reply #23 on: September 26, 2015, 04:32:04 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Pope Pius XII stated, when Russia, Bolshevic, took over and replaced their priest, bishops with their own kind to support Gov't, anyone who takes this position, or align themselves to them are excommunicated.

    We who are traditional, are traditional, because we refuse to align ourselves with those who are excommunicated.  It takes no tribunal to excommunicate ourselves and that includes a pope.

    When Russia took over it was by force.  In the USA, it was to be slow, very slow, weaken and take over.  We had that in the 40's at least.

    We will know our enemies by their fruits.  As True Catholics, whether a name is in the Mass or not, we pray for all enemies, for conversion.  In the Mass it is said, N. or Pope,  and N. our Bishop, all "True Believers, who cherish the catholic and apostolic church.  Those that Pope Pius XII referred to as excommunicated, are not true believers, and do not cherish the church, for their fruits tell it, and Christ told us that we would know them by their fruits.

    We all can not align ourselves for they are excommunicated for their manifest actions.  We know, that for example, New Order, publicly destroyed the Mass.  That is it!  They also use great words that they are pro-life and their fruits are the money that goes to charities that support abortion.

    The proof  of the New Order Mass destroyed should be enough!  A pope that does that excommunicates himself and we pray for his conversion.

    Offline Matthew

    • Mod
    • *****
    • Posts: 31174
    • Reputation: +27089/-494
    • Gender: Male
    Why Arent Sedevacantists more impressive?
    « Reply #24 on: September 26, 2015, 04:57:30 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: 2Vermont

    Then who were you thinking of?  I mean, you are on a sede forum.  Are most of us there what you were thinking of ? And if not, exactly where do you come up with this conclusion?  
     


    EXCUSE me?

    This is most certainly NOT a sede forum. I am the sole moderator and owner, and I am not even sedevacantist!  So how could this be a sede forum?

    And where on this forum -- anywhere -- does it say this is a sedevacantist forum?

    It's a Traditional Catholic forum that allows as many "flavors" as will get along and co-exist in peace, at least for the minutes they are on here each day.  If anything, it's a Resistance forum. And the Resistance is not sedevacantist.

    CathInfo's "position" if it had one, would be that of Bishop Williamson.

    Long story short, let the owner/moderator speak for the forum -- you speak for yourself.
    Want to say "thank you"? 
    You can send me a gift from my Amazon wishlist!
    https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

    Paypal donations: matthew@chantcd.com

    Offline MaterDominici

    • Mod
    • *****
    • Posts: 5438
    • Reputation: +4152/-96
    • Gender: Female
    Why Arent Sedevacantists more impressive?
    « Reply #25 on: September 26, 2015, 05:07:35 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Matthew
    Quote from: 2Vermont

    Then who were you thinking of?  I mean, you are on a sede forum.  Are most of us there what you were thinking of ? And if not, exactly where do you come up with this conclusion?  
     


    EXCUSE me?

    This is most certainly NOT a sede forum. I am the sole moderator and owner, and I am not even sedevacantist!  So how could this be a sede forum?

    And where on this forum -- anywhere -- does it say this is a sedevacantist forum?

    It's a Traditional Catholic forum that allows as many "flavors" as will get along and co-exist in peace, at least for the minutes they are on here each day.  If anything, it's a Resistance forum. And the Resistance is not sedevacantist.

    CathInfo's "position" if it had one, would be that of Bishop Williamson.

    Long story short, let the owner/moderator speak for the forum -- you speak for yourself.


    Her use of the word "there" suggests she's talking about somewhere else.

    It is a bit confusing.
    "I think that Catholicism, that's as sane as people can get."  - Jordan Peterson


    Offline 2Vermont

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 10051
    • Reputation: +5251/-916
    • Gender: Female
    Why Arent Sedevacantists more impressive?
    « Reply #26 on: September 26, 2015, 06:36:36 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: 2Vermont
    Quote from: Matto
    Quote from: TKGS
    This is amusing.  

    rum complains that sedevacantists aren't "impressive" enough while Matto complains that they aren't "humble" enough.  We're damned if we do and we're damned if we don't.

    rum:  You've been a member now for 6 days and you've already sized up the sedevacantists on the forum a great deal.  Now that's impressive.

    If it makes you feel any better, I wasn't thinking of you when I made my post, but I believe it to be true for many sedevacantists, especially those with an internet presence. And rum used to post here for a while under a different name so he isn't really a new member.


    Mod edit: CathInfo is NOT a sedevacantist forum. You speak for yourself! Only I can speak for the forum.


    Then who were you thinking of?  I mean, you are on a sede forum.  Are most of us there what you were thinking of ? And if not, exactly where do you come up with this conclusion?  
     


    Um, I wasn't referring to CathInfo.  Matto is a member on another forum which is a sede forum.  I think you already know that I know this isn't a sede forum.  To think you think I do is actually pretty funny.
    For there shall arise false Christs and false prophets, and shall shew great signs and wonders, insomuch as to deceive (if possible) even the elect. (Matthew 24:24)

    Offline 2Vermont

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 10051
    • Reputation: +5251/-916
    • Gender: Female
    Why Arent Sedevacantists more impressive?
    « Reply #27 on: September 26, 2015, 06:38:57 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Matthew
    Quote from: 2Vermont

    Then who were you thinking of?  I mean, you are on a sede forum.  Are most of us there what you were thinking of ? And if not, exactly where do you come up with this conclusion?  
     


    EXCUSE me?

    This is most certainly NOT a sede forum. I am the sole moderator and owner, and I am not even sedevacantist!  So how could this be a sede forum?

    And where on this forum -- anywhere -- does it say this is a sedevacantist forum?

    It's a Traditional Catholic forum that allows as many "flavors" as will get along and co-exist in peace, at least for the minutes they are on here each day.  If anything, it's a Resistance forum. And the Resistance is not sedevacantist.

    CathInfo's "position" if it had one, would be that of Bishop Williamson.

    Long story short, let the owner/moderator speak for the forum -- you speak for yourself.


    LOL. You're funny Matthew.  You really thought I was referring to THIS forum as a sede forum.    :laugh2:
    For there shall arise false Christs and false prophets, and shall shew great signs and wonders, insomuch as to deceive (if possible) even the elect. (Matthew 24:24)

    Offline 2Vermont

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 10051
    • Reputation: +5251/-916
    • Gender: Female
    Why Arent Sedevacantists more impressive?
    « Reply #28 on: September 26, 2015, 06:50:01 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: MaterDominici
    Quote from: Matthew
    Quote from: 2Vermont

    Then who were you thinking of?  I mean, you are on a sede forum.  Are most of us there what you were thinking of ? And if not, exactly where do you come up with this conclusion?  
     


    EXCUSE me?

    This is most certainly NOT a sede forum. I am the sole moderator and owner, and I am not even sedevacantist!  So how could this be a sede forum?

    And where on this forum -- anywhere -- does it say this is a sedevacantist forum?

    It's a Traditional Catholic forum that allows as many "flavors" as will get along and co-exist in peace, at least for the minutes they are on here each day.  If anything, it's a Resistance forum. And the Resistance is not sedevacantist.

    CathInfo's "position" if it had one, would be that of Bishop Williamson.

    Long story short, let the owner/moderator speak for the forum -- you speak for yourself.


    Her use of the word "there" suggests she's talking about somewhere else.

    It is a bit confusing.


    It's actually not confusing at all (at least it shouldn't be to Matthew).  Given the reference to "there" and the fact that I have been on this site for a few years now and have never even hinted that this site is anything but R&R, I think it was very clear I was not speaking of CI.  Perhaps people are a bit touchy and reactionary these days.....
    For there shall arise false Christs and false prophets, and shall shew great signs and wonders, insomuch as to deceive (if possible) even the elect. (Matthew 24:24)

    Offline rum

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1341
    • Reputation: +594/-596
    • Gender: Male
    Why Arent Sedevacantists more impressive?
    « Reply #29 on: September 27, 2015, 07:42:34 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: TKGS
    Quote from: rum
    All  trad groups are about equally impressive/unimpressive when it comes to members infected with PC ideas and Judaized.


    Then why just bring up sedevacantists if you think sedevacantists are on the same level as the SSPX, R&R, etc.?  


    Yeah, I should have given the thread a different title and spread the observation across several trad groups. I've been thinking about sedes a lot lately because I've been spending a lot of time on another forum that is pro-sede. Griff Ruby posts at this other forum, and he's respected by many of the people on that forum. And yet he posts major error on Jєωs, which I highlighted in this thread: http://www.cathinfo.com/catholic.php/Griff-Ruby-is-Questionable-on-the-Jєωs
    Some would have people believe that I'm a deceiver because I've used various handles on different Catholic forums. They only know this because I've always offered such information, unprompted. Various troll accounts on FE. Ben on SuscipeDomine. Patches on ABLF 1.0 and TeDeum. GuitarPlucker, Busillis, HatchC, and Rum on Cathinfo.