Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 30 31 [32] 33 34 ... 40

Author Topic: White smoke at Vatican  (Read 13624 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Pax Vobis

  • Supporter
Re: White smoke at Vatican
« Reply #155 on: May 09, 2025, 02:18:00 PM »
Quote from: SimpleMan on May 09, 2025, 01:30:48 PM
Maybe I'm just thick, but what is wrong with anything that he said here? 

(Assuming anyone makes that assertion.)
I don't see anything wrong with what he said.  But...i'm not really sure WHAT he said.  :laugh1:  It was a generic, spiritually-sounding, word-salad.
Logged

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: White smoke at Vatican
« Reply #156 on: May 09, 2025, 02:20:04 PM »
Quote from: Pax Vobis on May 09, 2025, 02:18:00 PM
I don't see anything wrong with what he said.  But...i'm not really sure WHAT he said.  :laugh1:  It was a generic, spiritually-sounding, word-salad.

Some stuff he had written beforehand sounds like total word salad ... but one red light to me was referring to "Mary, Mother of the Church", refusing her the title Mother of God.
Logged

Offline Cera

Re: White smoke at Vatican
« Reply #157 on: May 09, 2025, 02:36:34 PM »
Quote from: Persto on May 09, 2025, 01:35:57 PM
Fr. Zepeda says this  ^^^  also.
This video talks about the cover-up and culpability of Prevost in sɛҳuąƖ scandals, and how Bergoglio knowingly promoted him.  Also, other facts about Prevost, that are available now, but may disappear. 

Thanks Persto. Great video!
Logged

Online WorldsAway

Re: White smoke at Vatican
« Reply #158 on: May 09, 2025, 02:37:43 PM »
Quote from: SimpleMan on May 09, 2025, 01:30:48 PM
Maybe I'm just thick, but what is wrong with anything that he said here? 

(Assuming anyone makes that assertion.)
Aside from him saying the "mystical Body of the Church" (could be mistranslated, or him misspeaking. I've only ever read the "Mystical Body of Christ", which is the Church) it seems pretty orthodox to me. But that is the problem, it's not something you would expect from a supposed protege of Francis. He affirms papal primacy, refers to the Church as an "ark of salvation", the members of the Church as "the people whom God has chosen as His own". This isn't like his speech yesterday at all. We'll have to wait and see what else he says/does, but if he continues on like this I wouldn't be surprised if "conservative" Catholics, Indulters, SSPX take this as some sort of Pius IX conversion and fall in line
Logged

Offline Stubborn

  • Supporter
Re: White smoke at Vatican
« Reply #159 on: May 09, 2025, 02:41:01 PM »
Quote from: SimpleMan on May 09, 2025, 01:30:48 PM
Maybe I'm just thick, but what is wrong with anything that he said here? 

(Assuming anyone makes that assertion.)
He blew it at his first blessing, so this was his perfect opportunity to say, or at the very least, hint something Catholic, but he didn't even say the word "Catholic." Typical NO homily. Nothing but blah blah blah Jesus, blah blah blah Christ blah blah blah NO useless nothing.

What gets me is that this man is another one who is on the road to facing Our Lord an idiot at best, or a Judas and worse. It boggles my mind when I think of it. 
 
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 30 31 [32] 33 34 ... 40
« previous next »