I hope the new pope isn't Donald Trump.LOL
Let us pray there is a legitimate successor to Pope Michael I
I hope the new pope isn't Donald Trump.
As mentioned, it's naturally impossible that they would get a "Pope" on the second day every single time since Montini ... unless they had already pre-selected who they were going to roll out.
Who's the fattest papabile?
So JH Westen called Prevost ... that guy has access to a leaker.
I wasn't expecting an American....
Opus Judei
Yep.
Westen was coming up with very concrete details. Said that the first votes were split between Parolin and Erdő, and then last night he was saying that Prevost had emerged as the front-runner.
How did he know this?
That's also a very long speech to have whipped up in just a few minutes.
Speech sounds like it could have been one of Bergoglio's so far ::)
I was too busy reading this thread to have bothered to listen .....Building bridges, everyone walking together, welcoming with open arms..the usual
Building bridges, everyone walking together, welcoming with open arms..the usualI've read he's a centrist/progressive. Might be the man to unite both sides?
On wikipedia it says his father was French and mother Italian but the profile of his nose is very semitic.
On wikipedia it says his father was French and mother Italian but the profile of his nose is very semitic.When seeing him in profile, he looks very much like Leo XIII.
Building bridges, everyone walking together, welcoming with open arms..the usual
I've read he's a centrist/progressive. Might be the man to unite both sides?Uh oh ....
When seeing him in profile, he looks very much like Leo XIII.He does look a little like Leo XIII. I honestly don't know anything about him. Leo XIII was an intellectual powerhouse.
Was disappointed he didn't address the english speaking catholics.
What is the esoteric significance of:Wikipedia says he a mathematician and canon lawyer. He looks like a good consigliere.
a. The name Leo XIV
b. That he's an American
Surely "b" has to do with a) green lighting and excusing of the genocides in Ukraine and Gaza, along with the utter destruction of the remaining sovereign nations still blocking the ѕуηαgσgυє's path; and b) a total swallowing up of the false church into the greater israel/american empire project.
So now what do we think of Trump's parading around in pope-drag? Predictive programming?
Cardinal Schönborn has just said on Austrian TV that an important topic in the pre-conclave was synodality. Many cardinals emphasized the need for more teamwork at the top of the Church. Schönborn believes this is one reason why Prevost was chosen. Prevost was also his personal insider tip.
PREVOST Card. Robert Francis, O.S.A. (https://press.vatican.va/content/salastampa/en/docuмentation/cardinali_biografie/cardinali_bio_prevost_rf/_jcr_content/parsys/textimage/image.img.jpg/1719047031807.jpg) Cardinal Robert Francis Prevost, O.S.A., Prefect of the Dicastery for Bishops, Archbishop-Bishop emeritus of Chiclayo, was born on 14 September 1955 in Chicago (Illinois, United States). IN 1977 he entered the novitiate of the Order of Saint Augustine (O.S.A.) in the province of Our Lady of Good Counsel, in Saint Louis. On 29 August 1981 he gave his solemn vows. He studied at the Catholic Theological Union of Chicago, receiving a diploma in theology. At the age of 27 he was sent by the Order to Rome to study canon law at the Pontifical Saint Thomas Aquinas University (Angelicuм). He received priestly ordination on 19 June 1982. He received his licentiate in 1984, and was then sent to work in the mission of Chulucanas, in Piura, Peru (1985-1986). In 1987 he was awarded a doctorate with the thesis: “The role of the local prior in the Order of Saint Augustine”. In the same year he was elected director of vocations and director of the missions of the Augustinian province of “Mother of Good Counsel” of Olympia Fields, Illinois, United States of America. In 1988 he was sent to the mission of Trujillo as director of the joint formation project for Augustinian aspirants in the Vicariates of Chulucanas, Iquitos and Apurímac. There he served as community prior (1988-1992), director of formation (1988-1998) and teacher of the professed (1992-1998). In the archdiocese of Trujillo he was judicial vicar (1989-1998), and professor of canon, patristic and moral law in the “San Carlos e San Marcelo” Major Seminary. In 1999 he was elected provincial prior of the “Mother of Good Counsel” province, Chicago. After two and a half years, the ordinary general Chapter elected him prior general, a ministry again entrusted to him in the 2007 ordinary general Chapter. In October 2013 he returned to his province (Chicago) to serve as teacher of the professed and provincial vicar, roles he held 3 November 2014, when Pope Francis appointed him apostolic administrator of the diocese of Chiclayo, Peru, elevating him to the dignity of bishop and assigning him the titular diocese of Sufar. On 7 November he took canonical possession of the diocese in the presence of the apostolic nuncio James Patrick Green; he was ordained a bishop on 12 December, Feast of Our Lady of Guadalupe, in the cathedral of his diocese. He served as bishop of Chiclayo from 26 November 2015. In March 2018 he became second vice president of the Peruvian Episcopal Conference. Pope Francis appointed him a member of the Congregation for the Clergy in 2019, and member of the Congregation for Bishops in 2020. On 15 April 2020, the Pope appointed him apostolic administrator of the diocese of Callao. On 30 January 2023 Pope Francis appointed Cardinal Prevost as prefect of the Dicastery for Bishops and presidet of the Pontifical Commission for Latin America. Created and proclaimed Cardinal by Pope Francis in the Consistory of 30 September 2023, of the Deaconry of Santa Monica. Member of:
|
His theology is thoroughly Bergoglian. But anyone with any sense already knew that with a cardinalate 70% packed by Bergoglio's men, whoever succeeded him would share his theology.
The surprise (shock, even) is that they chose an American.
Something political is clearly going on here. I assume the idea is to have greater influence on English speaking countries.
Likely, Prevost will end up even more reviled than Bergoglio (by English speakers). He shares his politics, promotes immigration, hates Trump and MAGA, etc. but unlike Bergoglio he speaks the language, so he'll be able to upset Americans in a way Bergoglio wasn't. That won't happen over night, but it's definitely a risk.
He might even make a sede out of some of you ;)
Was he "created" by Bergoglio?Yes
Cardinal Robert Francis Prevost, O.S.A., Prefect of the Dicastery for Bishops, Archbishop-Bishop emeritus of Chiclayo, was born on 14 September 1955 in Chicago (Illinois, United States). IN 1977 he entered the novitiate of the Order of Saint Augustine (O.S.A.) in the province of Our Lady of Good Counsel, in Saint Louis. On 29 August 1981 he gave his solemn vows. He studied at the Catholic Theological Union of Chicago, receiving a diploma in theology.
At the age of 27 he was sent by the Order to Rome to study canon law at the Pontifical Saint Thomas Aquinas University (Angelicuм). He received priestly ordination on 19 June 1982. He received his licentiate in 1984, and was then sent to work in the mission of Chulucanas, in Piura, Peru (1985-1986).
In 1987 he was awarded a doctorate with the thesis: “The role of the local prior in the Order of Saint Augustine”. In the same year he was elected director of vocations and director of the missions of the Augustinian province of “Mother of Good Counsel” of Olympia Fields, Illinois, United States of America. In 1988 he was sent to the mission of Trujillo as director of the joint formation project for Augustinian aspirants in the Vicariates of Chulucanas, Iquitos and Apurímac. There he served as community prior (1988-1992), director of formation (1988-1998) and teacher of the professed (1992-1998). In the archdiocese of Trujillo he was judicial vicar (1989-1998), and professor of canon, patristic and moral law in the “San Carlos e San Marcelo” Major Seminary.
In 1999 he was elected provincial prior of the “Mother of Good Counsel” province, Chicago. After two and a half years, the ordinary general Chapter elected him prior general, a ministry again entrusted to him in the 2007 ordinary general Chapter. In October 2013 he returned to his province (Chicago) to serve as teacher of the professed and provincial vicar, roles he held 3 November 2014, when Pope Francis appointed him apostolic administrator of the diocese of Chiclayo, Peru, elevating him to the dignity of bishop and assigning him the titular diocese of Sufar. On 7 November he took canonical possession of the diocese in the presence of the apostolic nuncio James Patrick Green; he was ordained a bishop on 12 December, Feast of Our Lady of Guadalupe, in the cathedral of his diocese. He served as bishop of Chiclayo from 26 November 2015. In March 2018 he became second vice president of the Peruvian Episcopal Conference. Pope Francis appointed him a member of the Congregation for the Clergy in 2019, and member of the Congregation for Bishops in 2020.
On 15 April 2020, the Pope appointed him apostolic administrator of the diocese of Callao.
On 30 January 2023 Pope Francis appointed Cardinal Prevost as prefect of the Dicastery for Bishops and presidet of the Pontifical Commission for Latin America.
Created and proclaimed Cardinal by Pope Francis in the Consistory of 30 September 2023, of the Deaconry of Santa Monica.
Member of:
- The Dicasteries for: Evangelization, Section for first evangelization and the new particular Churches; the Doctrine of the Faith; the Eastern Churches; the Clergy; the Institutes of Consecrated Life and the Societies of Apostolic Life; Culture and Education; Legislative Texts;
- The Pontifical Commission for Vatican City State.
An advocacy group of survivors of clerical abuse is raising concerns about several cardinals who are buzzed about as papabili, or potential popes.
Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests held a press conference Wednesday (April 30) in a hotel next to Pope Francis' resting place at the Basilica of St. Mary Major to announce new information about prominent cardinals the group accuses of covering up or mishandling sɛҳuąƖ abuse cases. In addition to compiling accusations and information for the public, SNAP has filed complaints with the Vatican under Pope Francis' Vos Estis Lux Mundi ("You are the light of the world") laws, intended to confront abuse.
Among those named in the group's complaints are Cardinals Luis Antonio Tagle, Péter Erdő, Robert Prevost and Joseph Tobin. SNAP claimed there is evidence of their ignoring or covering up reports of abuse and seeks full investigations.
In addition, Prevost is among several U.S. cardinals against whom complaints have been lodged by the Survivors Network of Those Abused by Priests (SNAP) for allegedly mishandling abuse complaints. One concerns the accused priest in Chicago, the other two priests in Chiclayo in Peru. There is a compelling other side to that story: Multiple parties have defended Prevost’s conduct in both cases, the canon lawyer who initially represented the Peruvian victims is a disgraced ex-priest with an axe to grind, and while in Chiclayo Prevost was head of a successful diocesan commission for child protection. Still, the mere hint of culpability might be enough to worry some electors.
https://cruxnow.com/papal-transition/2025/05/papabile-of-the-day-cardinal-robert-francis-prevostThis one from the college of cardinals, not so much
This article defends him, and makes a case for him. Good defense best offense?
Editor’s Note: Pope Francis promoted Father Prevost so quickly to the status of Cardinal Bishop of Albano, that, knowing as I do how Pope Francis promotes sɛҳuąƖ perverts and those who protect pedophiles, I did just 15 minutes of research, and presto magico, I found a serial pedophile who is a member of the Augustinian Order, and who was under the jurisdiction of Cardinal Prevost when he was provincial of the Augustinians in their province in Illinois, USA; and who was protected by the future Cardinal despite numerous accusations against him. Here is the story of Friar Richard McGrath by a legal team which represented victims of sɛҳuąƖ abuse. I urge all Catholics to read this.
Editor’s Note: THIS IS NOT GOOD NEWS. Provost protected the serial child rapist, Friar Richard McGrath, an Augustinian Monk, like Prevost, in Illinois, and ignored numerous women who had been abused in Peru. For more on this see here: https://www.fromrome.info/2025/05/06/augustinian-fr-richard-mcgrath-the-serial-pedophile-protected-by-cardinal-prevost/
His position on the heretical and blasphemous “Fiducia supplicans” is not Catholic, since he says that Bishops should be allowed to implement it as they want: that is simply NOT CATHOLIC, that is heresy. The Catholic Church is not the Anglican Church where doctrine is up for grabs. For more information on this see here: https://www.fromrome.info/2025/05/08/cardinal-prevost-is-a-formal-manifest-heretic-approves-of-fiducia-supplicans/
On this basis, I say that Prevost’s election MUST BE PRESUMED TO BE INVALID in virtue of Pope Pius IV’s Bull, “cuм ex apostolatus officio”.
I believe my judgement is shared by the Catholic Cardinals, none of whom were seen on the balconies of the Basilica of Saint Peter for the announcement of the election of Prevost. That is very significant. Cardinal Burke was not present even though he is an American.
Finally, I have listened to priests preach for all my life, as I go to daily mass, when I can; and I can tell you that I have never heard a man preach like Cardinal Prevost, on the balcony today, who sounds like he does not believe anything he is saying. His numerous praises of Pope Francis confirms his heretical communion with him.
I just didn't want to be the first to out his nose ......
He seems to me to be in the style of John Paul II.Could Cardinal Prevost be the first American pope? - LifeSite (https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/could-cardinal-prevost-be-the-first-american-pope/)
The revolution advances, just not as fast.
N.B. only the true Roman Catholic Church can elect a successor to St. Peter, not an apostate counterfeit sect that began at the heretical council of 1962-65.
Robert Prevost, Augustinian, born in Chicago in 1955.
BA in Math from Villanova then theological degrees in Rome including a J.C.D.
https://catholic-hierarchy.org/bishop/bprevost.html
Took the name Leo XIV so most likely Rerum Novarum, On Capital And Labor, and social issues are a thing to him.
https://web.archive.org/web/20120322213048/http://sedevacantist.org/encyclicals/Leo13/L13RERUM.HTM
https://catholic-hierarchy.org/bishop/bprevost.html
Spent almost entire career in South America and Rome.
Missionary in mountains of Bolivia, taught in seminary in Peru, Superior General of Augustinians, 'Bishop' in Peru, Prefect of Congregation of Bishops in Rome..
Assumption is through his last office the new widely scattered 'cardinals' were familiar with his name, did not want to go for one of the ranking contenders, so he was a quick 'safe' compromise candidate. Viewed as a 'centrist' in the sect.
Installation on Sunday May 15.
Have you never heard of the "Roman nose"? Apparently having a bump on the slope of your nose, or a crooked nose, is NOT an exclusively Jєωιѕн trait.
From another thread:
Fr. Girouard's email to his parishioners and email list
Good News: We are going back to a traditional name of a Pope: Leo. Away with newfangled names like John Paul and Francis.
Thank you!!! Everything we need to know. Invalid bishop, slithering serpent of the americas, and a creature of Bergoglio. 'Nuff said!
Note: Matin Luther was also a member of the Order of St. Augustine
Could Cardinal Prevost be the first American pope? - LifeSite (https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/could-cardinal-prevost-be-the-first-american-pope/)Interesting. So, he is American but was not in charge of an American diocese (like a Dolan).
:facepalm: ... can't believe how stupid people are, including priests? Yeah, great he's got a name that isn't John or Paul or John Paul. "Good News". :facepalm:
Yes, and the whole gaggle of these apostates also continue to call themselves "Catholic".
Being the Modernist that he is, would have been better had he dropped the facade and just called himself "Lucifer I".
Have you never heard of the "Roman nose"? Apparently having a bump on the slope of your nose, or a crooked nose, is NOT an exclusively Jєωιѕн trait.
Wasn't the Pontificate of Leo XIII considered very long? It was around 25 years. The interminable usurpation of wojtyla lasted 27 years.
Prevost is only 69. A long usurpation looms large.
It's only going to be as long as God permits it. Could drop dead from the 5th jab booster at any moment or get Lucianied.
Both my grandfather and my uncle had the same kind of nose, and they were neither Jєωιѕн nor Roman. British Isles stock.Well, the Romans were in Britain for a while, I'm sure many in the Isles today have some Roman blood
Have you never heard of the "Roman nose"? Apparently having a bump on the slope of your nose, or a crooked nose, is NOT an exclusively Jєωιѕн trait.It's not a hooked nose.
The first Baby Boomer “Pope.” It’s quite fitting the Neo-Vatican would pick an American Boomer for that roll. The only other possibility would be someone French.I thought Cupich likes little boys in cages.
A preview of what’s ahead:
(https://i.imgur.com/VcF0iey.jpeg)
Pope Leo III once crowned Charlemagne emperor.The holy roman empire was neither.
How likely is it that Leo XIV named himself after this predecessor and is thinking of crowning Donald Trump?
Donald would certainly like that. I'm already looking forward to the next AI images from the White House... :laugh1:
Was he "created" by Bergoglio?Meet the new pope( boss), same as the old pope ( boss).
LOL!!!! But the bad guys never die suddenly!!!
Let us pray there is a legitimate successor to Pope Michael I:laugh2:
Let us pray there is a legitimate successor to Pope Michael I
:facepalm: ... can't believe how stupid people are, including priests? Yeah, great he's got a name that isn't John or Paul or John Paul. "Good News". :facepalm:
Yes, and the whole gaggle of these apostates also continue to call themselves "Catholic".
Being the Modernist that he is, would have been better had he dropped the facade and just called himself "Lucifer I".
What's wrong with his assessment? He's absolutely correct, Pope Leo hearkens back to pre-Vatican II popes, and TAKEN IN ISOLATION is a good thing.
"But remember: Benedict XVI did the same and came very close to absorbing the Neo-SSPX. This may very well happen now, especially in view of the Neo-SSPX wanting a new bishop."
Seems simple, but I look forward to a qualified analysis of his coat of arms and other papal symbols he brings forth.
(https://i.imgur.com/QMJu6S5.png)
On wikipedia it says his father was French and mother Italian but the profile of his nose is very semitic.His father was of Italian and French descent. His mother was the daughter of Louisiana Creole parents, Joseph Martínez and Louise Baquié, from New Orleans who were of African, French, and Spanish descent. Martínez was Afro-Haitian, and Baquié a Black Creole.[color=var(--color-progressive,#36c)]
Seems simple, but I look forward to a qualified analysis of his coat of arms and other papal symbols he brings forth.
Per Chiesa Viva,
Ratzinger’s coat of arms was rife with occult meaning and Bergolio was off the charts with his masonic artwork.
(https://i.imgur.com/vlhadgv.png)If this guy turns out to be the false prophet it would certainly be par for course that he's a crypto heeb.
His (hell) eyes, nose and mouth signal racial crypto-jew, likely from his momma's side as her ancestry, by narrative, is so muddled.
What's really creepy is his motto: in illo uno unumIt's a quote from St. Augustine's Enarrationes in Psalmum 127.
So what are benevacantists going to be doing? I can see Ann Barnhardt has the vacant see banner still on her blog. Will they finally see that Bergoglio was not the root of the problem?
I'm not a fan of Westen but here is a preliminary report on Prevost.
It's a quote from St. Augustine's Enarrationes in Psalmum 127.
"Nos multi in illo uno unum" "
"Though we are many, in the one [Christ], we are one."
Prevost is fervently pro-open borders; he locked down churches during covid-19, he insisted on "communion" in the hand, and he wanted "confessions" done over the phone which is anti-Catholic and invalid.
Prevost is fervently pro-open borders; he locked down churches during covid-19, he insisted on "communion" in the hand, and he wanted "confessions" done over the phone which is anti-Catholic and invalid.Jone in Moral Theology said that there is a slight possibility that a confession over the telephone might be valid:
Interview of Prevost's brother here about his thoughts on his brother getting "elected" "pope". His brother seems effeminate and he has no children. An effeminate boomer with no children and, apparently, never married. An effeminate male with no family of his own and being from the boomer generation must set off the gαydar. Are the sodomites so close to the "papacy" as the "pope's" own brother?I watched the interview, and he is certainly not the most manly. But he seems to live in a regular residential neighborhood. Surely if he is a flamer it would leak out in the neighborhood and the press. Unless the guy is sneaking out to gαy bars in the middle of the night or something. Perhaps he thought all the Catholic girls in Chicago in the 60's were too much on the hippie side and he chose to stay single and teach?
Start at 6:10
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tbnZ8zz9_og
Interview of Prevost's brother here about his thoughts on his brother getting "elected" "pope". His brother seems effeminate and he has no children. An effeminate boomer with no children and, apparently, never married. An effeminate male with no family of his own and being from the boomer generation must set off the gαydar. Are the sodomites so close to the "papacy" as the "pope's" own brother?Never forget that bergoglio himself was a sodomite. See how he looked at those male performers.
Start at 6:10
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tbnZ8zz9_og
So what's doin' in the novus ordo today?I have a 1962 liturgical calendar, for this year, I believe made by a SSPX-adjacent group. It also has today as "Feria."
From an online Liturgy of the Hours:
https://www.ibreviary.com/m2/breviario.php
Thursday, 8 May 2025
Thursday of the Third Week of Easter
Tipo: Feriale - Tempo: Pasqua
_____________________________________________
What's doin' in the Roman Catholic Church today?
Thursday, 8 May 2025
https://www.divinumofficium.com/cgi-bin/horas/officium.pl
In Apparitione S. Michaëlis Archangeli ~ Duplex majus
Commemoratio: De II die infra Octavam S. Joseph
________________________________________________
So the filthy novus ordo sect is calling today of all days a "feria."
________________________________________________
God decreed the day that jorge became a stinking corpse; and He decreed what day the new imposter would be presented to an abjectly stupid world.
God's dates have meaning.
Looka here, at some of the other Feasts that the Church celebrated since Easter Monday, the date of bergoglio's judgment:
Remember that our God arranged all of this. God chose all of these dates:
In no particular order:
- St. Athanasius: defender of orthodoxy, even unto protracted extremis;
- St. Anselm: defender of the Church against an overreaching king;
- St. George: dragon slayer;
- St. Fidelis: his name is symbolic and he was stabbed to death by protestant heretics;
- The Greater Litanies;
- St. Peter of Verona: αssαssιnαtҽd by Manichaean scuм;
- St. Catherine of Sienna: who discerned the true Pope and got him to return to His Apostolic See;
- Sts. Philip and James: mighty Apostles, one of whom was the kinsman of Jesus, and the Bishop of Jerusalem;
- The Finding of the Holy Cross by St. Helena: mother of he who liberated the Church after 300+ years of dire persecution;
- St. Monica: famous for her persevering prayer in an impossible cause.
- St. Joseph, Patron of the Universal Church, Spouse of the Ever Blessed Virgin and Mother of God;
- In Apparitione S. Michaëlis Archangeli: Hic est Míchaël Archángelus, princeps milítiæ Angelórum, cujus honor præstat benefícia populórum, et orátio perdúcit ad regna cælórum. Archángelus Míchaël præpósitus paradísi, quem honoríficant Angelórum cives.
From the First Nocturn: Dan. 7:11: I beheld because of the voice of the great words which that horn spoke: and I saw that the beast was slain, and the body thereof was destroyed, and given to the fire to be burnt.
_____________________________________________________
The fake conclave began on the Feast of the Patron of the Universal Church and the putative Father of DNJC. It ended on the Feast of St. Michael, Angel of the Apocalypse, Victor over the devil and his legions, Shepherd of the souls of the Elect. This is not an accident.
I don't know who this Prevost is. Soon we will know. In fact, he most likely doesn't matter. What we do know, what we already know, what actually matters, is that our God is not far from us. Perhaps the sword of destruction hanging over the ѕуηαgσgυє's head is beginning to materialize in the mirror of the Church's public worship. Please God!
Yeah ... makes me wonder if he was installed just in time for the next Plandemic, so that he can order all the churches closed.
I've long believed that the next lockdown is going to be worse, and many Catholic will be going with out the Sacraments as a result.
I've long suggested that some of the Trad bishops set up an "underground" network of secretly-ordained priests who might be able to get the Sacraments to people in need under such conditions, but I don't think any of them are amenable. I know Bishop Slupski anticipated something like that ... since he wasn't complacent with normalcy bias like most of us are.
It's a quote from St. Augustine's Enarrationes in Psalmum 127.People take things out of context or misinterpret all the time. There are many aspects of Christianity is that, on the face of it reeks of globalism, Catholic by it's very name means " universal", which again, on the face of it, can mean whatever you want it to mean.
"Nos multi in illo uno unum" "
"Though we are many, in the one [Christ], we are one."
(https://i.imgur.com/vlhadgv.png)I do see the African in the woodpile, not so much the jew.
His (hell) eyes, nose and mouth signal racial crypto-jew, likely from his momma's side as her ancestry, by narrative, is so muddled.
I used to like the guy, thinking he was sincere but wrong.Westen has been a vatican journalist for decades, of course he had inside information, it's a tool of his craft, all good journalists get the inside dope early, if you actually work at your trade.
Well, after teh first two rounds of voting, he announced (as if it were fact) that the early vote had been split between Parolin and Erdo. Then LAST NIGHT, he said, again announcing it as if it were just regular news, that Prevost had emerged as the front-runner.
HOW DID HE KNOW THIS? Absolutely nobody was expecting this guy to win, yet Westen correctly called that Prevost had emerged.
Either he had a mole within the Conclave or else he had the script ahead of time ... such as the BBC with Building 7.
People have said that he's associated with Opus Judei. Do we have any concrete details about that? This requires some investigation.
Bad guys die when and how God wants them to ...Russian proverb: You're not going to drown when you're destined to hang.
It's a quote from St. Augustine's Enarrationes in Psalmum 127.
"Nos multi in illo uno unum" "
"Though we are many, in the one [Christ], we are one."
I have a 1962 liturgical calendar, for this year, I believe made by a SSPX-adjacent group. It also has today as "Feria."
Have you never heard of the "Roman nose"? Apparently having a bump on the slope of your nose, or a crooked nose, is NOT an exclusively Jєωιѕн trait.That's not the same as the hooked claw nose which is exclusively of the jew (that's not to say all jews have the hooked claw nose). My great aunt was full Sicilian and she had that classic bump Roman nose. Prevost has the hooked claw nose. He, also, has a reptile mouth which is a jew trait.
The comments on the Jesuit America Magazine article regarding Bob Prevost are a good indication of what to expect. Several commenters praised Prevost for sitting at the table with James Martin every day during the last synod. Most have great hope that he will be Bergoglio 2.0, paying particular attention to LGBTetc "inclusion" and the formation of female "priests." Apparently, Prevost also went into great detail discussing his maternal pedigree, which includes black Haitian and Louisiana Creole of color roots. This pleases America readers very much as they associate racial diversity with their social justice agenda.
On NOW, poster Eduardo Montañero made an excellent observation:
What red blooded, Catholic man could occupy the same table with that reeking pervert over the course of an entire multi-day event? No greater example of guilt by association than this.
Mindless (and faithless) "Trads" are all going gaga over the fact that he wore traditional vestments and there was some Latin used at his "Mass" ... in addition to the name Leo. I really didn't think most people would be this shallow and stupid. Of course they're filtering out the female lectors and his pushing Synodal Church by some kind of bizarre cognitive dissonance.I knew as soon as I saw he was towing the Francis line on ordo amoris. Was arguing with a couple (novus ordo, but anti open borders) Catholic friends about this and eventually realized I wasn’t gonna get anywhere.
I thought I was the only one who realized this guy looks like a sodomite ... until Brother Nathanael just posted along those lines. Look at his High School picture. Since his family is around, someone should ask if he ever dated a girl. Those types like a bit of smell and bell.
We also have both Sarah and Burke hailing his election, proving once and for all that they were never going to be part of the solution, as these were the best hopes of Trad, Inc. ... the Great White Hope and Great Black Hope. When the best of the best can do nothing but issue few mealy-mouthed "uncertainties" in the face of clear, obvious, abject heresy, that tells us what we need to know.
I thought it would take a Sarah to fool the Trads, but I was giving them too much credit. All it evidently takes is his talking about Synodal Church in Latin and wearing traditional vestments while sitting there listening to female lectors.
. He, also, has a reptile mouth which is a jew trait.A lot of people have this due to teeth extractions and braces pushing the upper and lower jaws backwards.
Jone in Moral Theology said that there is a slight possibility that a confession over the telephone might be valid:Interesting. If I'm reading/understanding that correctly, it sounds like it is conditional and in cases of necessity. I take that to mean that the penitent would still need to follow up with in-person confession.
(https://i.imgur.com/G6Y7mXi.png)
As mentioned, it's naturally impossible that they would get a "Pope" on the second day every single time since Montini ... unless they had already pre-selected who they were going to roll out.
(https://i.imgur.com/vlhadgv.png)There’s a recent precedent with JPII and his Jєωιѕн mother, surname “Katz”.
His (hell) eyes, nose and mouth signal racial crypto-jew, likely from his momma's side as her ancestry, by narrative, is so muddled.
So, apart from the physiognomy controversy, am I the only one that thinks his physical appearance suggests a certain orientation? I thought I was until Brother Nathanael posted something imply that as well.What kind of man desires to become a novus ordo presider? Or enter into the purple palace seminaries? What kind of fruit can the Novus Ordo establishment produce? It should be obvious to anyone with eyes to see that the Vatican ll religion is not the Catholic religion and the men who enter those seminaries are not intending to become Catholic priests.
(https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSVBrhOFmrp9_nwYYgRQgqW5Fo1Tk_IZpR05w&s)
(https://s.yimg.com/ny/api/res/1.2/cm7pqlIE_nfgMqt6IKJM9Q--/YXBwaWQ9aGlnaGxhbmRlcjt3PTk2MDtoPTE1MzU-/https://media.zenfs.com/en/the_telegraph_258/9b93c36955771023270e5811e10f6ff5)
(https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRy0_-S_DHmMHz-Tfay3NdgLy3HziDExA8GQQ&s)
So, apart from the physiognomy controversy, am I the only one that thinks his physical appearance suggests a certain orientation? I thought I was until Brother Nathanael posted something imply that as well.Just about every bishop, cardinal and a good majority of the novus ordo priests I've seen all seem to have a deficit of testosterone. One would never characterize them as being masculine by any stretch of the imagination. I believe the apostles, martyrs, and hierarchy up to the last hundred years had far more in common in terms of appearance with Sean Connery than these men, whom would look right at home attending a Barbara Streisand concert or working as a florist in San Francisco.
(https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSVBrhOFmrp9_nwYYgRQgqW5Fo1Tk_IZpR05w&s)
(https://s.yimg.com/ny/api/res/1.2/cm7pqlIE_nfgMqt6IKJM9Q--/YXBwaWQ9aGlnaGxhbmRlcjt3PTk2MDtoPTE1MzU-/https://media.zenfs.com/en/the_telegraph_258/9b93c36955771023270e5811e10f6ff5)
(https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRy0_-S_DHmMHz-Tfay3NdgLy3HziDExA8GQQ&s)
What kind of man desires to become a novus ordo presider? Or enter into the purple palace seminaries? What kind of fruit can the Novus Ordo establishment produce? It should be obvious to anyone with eyes to see that the Vatican ll religion is not the Catholic religion and the men who enter those seminaries are not intending to become Catholic priests.
What kind of man desires to become a novus ordo presider? Or enter into the purple palace seminaries? What kind of fruit can the Novus Ordo establishment produce? It should be obvious to anyone with eyes to see that the Vatican ll religion is not the Catholic religion and the men who enter those seminaries are not intending to become Catholic priests.There are some rather orthodox priests in the NO these days. The younger generation ordained in the last decade is a big example.
(https://i.imgur.com/vlhadgv.png)
His (hell) eyes, nose and mouth signal racial crypto-jew, likely from his momma's side as her ancestry, by narrative, is so muddled.
You're crazy. Besides his "Roman nose", I see no Jєωιѕн features on his face.
I know all the Jєωιѕн features. I'm 100% aware on the JQ.
Mark79 will vouch for me that I'm a completely awake on the JQ.
But I don't see Jews under every bush. I'm not paranoid.
It may not be rigged, but it was heavily favored towards Leo XIV. I am becoming increasingly convinced that he is who Francis hand-picked and groomed as his successor.I think the primary reason Francis and Leo XIV oppose Trump on immigration is because that's been the biggest moneymaker for the conciliar church as they have received billions in contracts through Catholic Charities to resettle the invaders.
Here's how you know: Why else was he made a Cardinal only two and a half years ago? Why did he go from being consecrated as a bishop to Pope in 10 years? The 10th anniversary of his consecration as Bishop of Chiclayo, Peru, was just this past December.
They're very similar in practice: Both spent much time in impoverished parts of South America, both are theologically fairly liberal, both are big fans of "synodality," and both were heavy critics of Trump, Vance, and GOP immigration policy.
I will begin with a word in English, and the rest is in Italian. But I want to repeat the words from the Responsorial Psalm: “I will sing a new song to the Lord, because he has done marvels.”
And indeed, not just with me but with all of us. My brother Cardinals, as we celebrate this morning, I invite you to recognize the marvels that the Lord has done, the blessings that the Lord continues to pour out on all of us through the Ministry of Peter.
You have called me to carry that cross, and to be blessed with that mission, and I know I can rely on each and every one of you to walk with me, as we continue as a Church, as a community of friends of Jesus, as believers to announce the Good News, to announce the Gospel.
"You are the Christ, the Son of the living God" (Mt 16:16). In these words, Peter, asked by the Master, together with the other disciples, about his faith in him, expressed the patrimony that the Church, through the apostolic succession, has preserved, deepened and handed on for two thousand years.
Jesus is the Christ, the Son of the living God: the one Savior, who alone reveals the face of the Father.
In him, God, in order to make himself close and accessible to men and women, revealed himself to us in the trusting eyes of a child, in the lively mind of a young person and in the mature features of a man (cf. Gaudium et Spes, 22), finally appearing to his disciples after the resurrection with his glorious body. He thus showed us a model of human holiness that we can all imitate, together with the promise of an eternal destiny that transcends all our limits and abilities.
Peter, in his response, understands both of these things: the gift of God and the path to follow in order to allow himself to be changed by that gift. They are two inseparable aspects of salvation entrusted to the Church to be proclaimed for the good of the human race. Indeed, they are entrusted to us, who were chosen by him before we were formed in our mothers' wombs (cf. Jer 1:5), reborn in the waters of Baptism and, surpassing our limitations and with no merit of our own, brought here and sent forth from here, so that the Gospel might be proclaimed to every creature (cf. Mk 16:15).
In a particular way, God has called me by your election to succeed the Prince of the Apostles, and has entrusted this treasure to me so that, with his help, I may be its faithful administrator (cf. 1 Cor 4:2) for the sake of the entire mystical Body of the Church. He has done so in order that she may be ever more fully a city set on a hill (cf. Rev 21:10), an ark of salvation sailing through the waters of history and a beacon that illumines the dark nights of this world. And this, not so much through the magnificence of her structures or the grandeur of her buildings – like the monuments among which we find ourselves – but rather through the holiness of her members. For we are the people whom God has chosen as his own, so that we may declare the wonderful deeds of him who called us out of darkness into his marvelous light (cf. 1 Pet 2:9).
Peter, however, makes his profession of faith in reply to a specific question: "Who do people say that the Son of Man is?" (Mt 16:13). The question is not insignificant. It concerns an essential aspect of our ministry, namely, the world in which we live, with its limitations and its potential, its questions and its convictions.
"Who do people say that the Son of Man is?" If we reflect on the scene we are considering, we might find two possible answers, which characterize two different attitudes. First, there is the world's response. Matthew tells us that this conversation between Jesus and his disciples takes place in the beautiful town of Caesarea Philippi, filled with luxurious palaces, set in a magnificent natural landscape at the foot of Mount Hermon, but also a place of cruel power plays and the scene of betrayals and infidelity. This setting speaks to us of a world that considers Jesus a completely insignificant person, at best someone with an unusual and striking way of speaking and acting. And so, once his presence becomes irksome because of his demands for honesty and his stern moral requirements, this "world" will not hesitate to reject and eliminate him.
Then there is the other possible response to Jesus' question: that of ordinary people. For them, the Nazarene is not a charlatan, but an upright man, one who has courage, who speaks well and says the right things, like other great prophets in the history of Israel. That is why they follow him, at least for as long as they can do so without too much risk or inconvenience. Yet to them he is only a man, and therefore, in times of danger, during his passion, they too abandon him and depart disappointed.
What is striking about these two attitudes is their relevance today. They embody notions that we could easily find on the lips of many men and women in our own time, even if, while essentially identical, they are expressed in different language.
Even today, there are many settings in which the Christian faith is considered absurd, meant for the weak and unintelligent. Settings where other securities are preferred, like technology, money, success, power, or pleasure.
These are contexts where it is not easy to preach the Gospel and bear witness to its truth, where believers are mocked, opposed, despised or at best tolerated and pitied. Yet, precisely for this reason, they are the places where our missionary outreach is desperately needed. A lack of faith is often tragically accompanied by the loss of meaning in life, the neglect of mercy, appalling violations of human dignity, the crisis of the family and so many other wounds that afflict our society.
Today, too, there are many settings in which Jesus, although appreciated as a man, is reduced to a kind of charismatic leader or superman. This is true not only among non-believers but also among many baptized Christians, who thus end up living, at this level, in a state of practical atheism.
This is the world that has been entrusted to us, a world in which, as Pope Francis taught us so many times, we are called to bear witness to our joyful faith in Jesus the Savior. Therefore, it is essential that we too repeat, with Peter: "You are the Christ, the Son of the living God" (Mt 16:16).
It is essential to do this, first of all, in our personal relationship with the Lord, in our commitment to a daily journey of conversion. Then, to do so as a Church, experiencing together our fidelity to the Lord and bringing the Good News to all (cf. Lumen Gentium, 1).
I say this first of all to myself, as the Successor of Peter, as I begin my mission as Bishop of Rome and, according to the well-known expression of Saint Ignatius of Antioch, am called to preside in charity over the universal Church (cf. Letter to the Romans, Prologue). Saint Ignatius, who was led in chains to this city, the place of his impending sacrifice, wrote to the Christians there: "Then I will truly be a disciple of Jesus Christ, when the world no longer sees my body" (Letter to the Romans, IV, 1). Ignatius was speaking about being devoured by wild beasts in the arena – and so it happened – but his words apply more generally to an indispensable commitment for all those in the Church who exercise a ministry of authority. It is to move aside so that Christ may remain, to make oneself small so that he may be known and glorified (cf. Jn 3:30), to spend oneself to the utmost so that all may have the opportunity to know and love him.
May God grant me this grace, today and always, through the loving intercession of Mary, Mother of the Church.
Leo XIV's first homily:Maybe I'm just thick, but what is wrong with anything that he said here?
It may not be rigged, but it was heavily favored towards Leo XIV. I am becoming increasingly convinced that he is who Francis hand-picked and groomed as his successor.
Here's how you know: Why else was he made a Cardinal only two and a half years ago? Why did he go from being consecrated as a bishop to Pope in 10 years? The 10th anniversary of his consecration as Bishop of Chiclayo, Peru, was just this past December.
They're very similar in practice: Both spent much time in impoverished parts of South America, both are theologically fairly liberal, both are big fans of "synodality," and both were heavy critics of Trump, Vance, and GOP immigration policy.
The second post above is spot on, and demonstrates the whole conclave was a farceFr. Zepeda says this ^^^ also.
in keeping with everything since Vatican II. Nothing will change with post-Vatican II popes.
Just keep the faith, save your soul and those of your loved ones.
How God gets rid of them we will have to wait to see.
I tend to think that a lot of them thought going in "we'll pull for our guy [Parolin/Tagle/Sarah/Erdo/whomever], but if there's not enough momentum to swing things our way after a couple of ballots, then we can probably pretty much agree on Prevost, and get this thing over with, rather than grinding down to a deadlock".
Seen that way, it was probably a foregone conclusion among the cardinals.
Maybe I'm just thick, but what is wrong with anything that he said here?I don't see anything wrong with what he said. But...i'm not really sure WHAT he said. :laugh1: It was a generic, spiritually-sounding, word-salad.
(Assuming anyone makes that assertion.)
I don't see anything wrong with what he said. But...i'm not really sure WHAT he said. :laugh1: It was a generic, spiritually-sounding, word-salad.
Fr. Zepeda says this ^^^ also.Thanks Persto. Great video!
This video talks about the cover-up and culpability of Prevost in sɛҳuąƖ scandals, and how Bergoglio knowingly promoted him. Also, other facts about Prevost, that are available now, but may disappear.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qcdvl0WQZnI
Maybe I'm just thick, but what is wrong with anything that he said here?Aside from him saying the "mystical Body of the Church" (could be mistranslated, or him misspeaking. I've only ever read the "Mystical Body of Christ", which is the Church) it seems pretty orthodox to me. But that is the problem, it's not something you would expect from a supposed protege of Francis. He affirms papal primacy, refers to the Church as an "ark of salvation", the members of the Church as "the people whom God has chosen as His own". This isn't like his speech yesterday at all. We'll have to wait and see what else he says/does, but if he continues on like this I wouldn't be surprised if "conservative" Catholics, Indulters, SSPX take this as some sort of Pius IX conversion and fall in line
(Assuming anyone makes that assertion.)
Maybe I'm just thick, but what is wrong with anything that he said here?He blew it at his first blessing, so this was his perfect opportunity to say, or at the very least, hint something Catholic, but he didn't even say the word "Catholic." Typical NO homily. Nothing but blah blah blah Jesus, blah blah blah Christ blah blah blah NO useless nothing.
(Assuming anyone makes that assertion.)
Fr. Zepeda says this ^^^ also.
Interview of Prevost's brother here about his thoughts on his brother getting "elected" "pope". His brother seems effeminate and he has no children. An effeminate boomer with no children and, apparently, never married. An effeminate male with no family of his own and being from the boomer generation must set off the gαydar. Are the sodomites so close to the "papacy" as the "pope's" own brother?I can hear that lisp a mile away, wow, talk about being light in the loafers, this fella screams one big bowl of fruit loops.
Start at 6:10
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tbnZ8zz9_og
Some stuff he had written beforehand sounds like total word salad ... but one red light to me was referring to "Mary, Mother of the Church", refusing her the title Mother of God.
Although I consider myself a sede I admit that I was momentarily caught up in the conclave, the beauty of the spectacle, the anticipation of looking at that balcony, hoping against all odds some miracle might occur...I'.m at the point now, if you pushed the jab, you should be tossed in the chipper. I don't care who you are, fake pope or not.
and then it took all of about 15 minutes of research once the name was announced to find the following about the creep:
1. Protected pedophiles check
2. Advocated for infinity immigration to the West with all the murders, rapes, assorted crimes and
the misery and taxes that it brings..check
3. enforced communion in the hand check
4. like a true coward and Judas to the faith he remained silent while Bergoglio spread heresy after heresy check
5. Encouraged everyone take the poisonous aborted fetal tissue jab without any regard for their health or soul check
6. in behalf of Jorge he hand selected fellow apostates to be bishops check
Points 1 and 5 alone makes him a criminal worthy of a life sentence in prison but 2, 3, 4, 6 classify him as a demon in human form.
In the coming months I'm sure this list will be greatly expanded
What kind of man desires to become a novus ordo presider? Or enter into the purple palace seminaries? What kind of fruit can the Novus Ordo establishment produce? It should be obvious to anyone with eyes to see that the Vatican ll religion is not the Catholic religion and the men who enter those seminaries are not intending to become Catholic priests.You got the " fruit" part right.
You got the " fruit" part right.
Some stuff he had written beforehand sounds like total word salad ... but one red light to me was referring to "Mary, Mother of the Church", refusing her the title Mother of God.Church is the body of Christ? Mary, mother of the Body? I don't know, but it sounds strange.
Church is the body of Christ? Mary, mother of the Body? I don't know, but it sounds strange.
A lot of people have this due to teeth extractions and braces pushing the upper and lower jaws backwards.Not like a reptile. Only jews have the reptile mouth which can vary in dimension. Some look snake-like while others look frog-like, including the lips. But not all jews have the reptile mouth.
https://youtu.be/PJKg8OgW2sI?si=Bnp-rOP6MaHS5I7PWell, there you have it, just another globalist fag dressed up in fancy garb.
Well, the primary reason they do this is that they don't want to ruffle Prot feathers by referring to Our Lady as Mother of God.You're probably right about that.
You're crazy. Besides his "Roman nose", I see no Jєωιѕн features on his face.That's not a Roman nose.
But I don't see Jews under every bush. I'm not paranoid.Nor do I, nor am I, but your Jewdar isn't as good as mine.
Well, since you posted that physiognomy chart, I do say he bares a striking resemblance to the "Demon" category. Look closely. That would be rather ironic.And that physiognomy chart needs at least five more categories: The vulture face (Ruth Bader Ginsburg), rat face (Lloyd Blankfein), horse face (Sarah Jessica Parker and John "Kerry" [Kohn]), dog face (Helen Hunt), and gargoyle face (but the existing goblin and demon categories can easily substitute it). Not to mention the numerous reptile traits.
Well, the primary reason they do this is that they don't want to ruffle Prot feathers by referring to Our Lady as Mother of God.To be fair, during his speech from the balcony, he did pray, and invited the assembled crowd to pray, the Ave Maria, which of course includes “Holy Mary, Mother of God”.
To be fair, during his speech from the balcony, he did pray, and invited the assembled crowd to pray, the Ave Maria, which of course includes “Holy Mary, Mother of God”.
See, I've come to the conclusion that the Michael Matts and Taylor Marshalls of the world are greater enemies of the Catholic Faith than the open Modernists like Bergoglio ... because they blend the error in with some truth and are therfore more perniciously spreading error to souls who might otherwise be of good faith. If you have a single Catholic cell in your body, you recognize the non-Catholicity of a Jorge Bergoglio. I actually respect him for being open and honest.Is there some particular reason you assume these two in particular are doing it on purpose? I know you’ve argued with other people on here who have argued indult types are always in bad faith in general . So why these two specifically?
Bergoglio is trying to persuade you to take a spoonful of poison that practically has that universal POISON label right on the spoon, whereas Trad, Inc. are trying to bury the poison in a tablespoon or more of sugar so you swallow it without tasting and without noticing.
Michael Matt and Taylor Marshall are far more pernicious that the open Modernists. We need to stop battling the open Modernists and start calling those turds out to expose their errors and try to arrest the damage they're doing to souls.
No, there's no "to be fair" here. Let's stop with this sniveling / blubbering pretense of having "chawity" (as Bishop Williamson called it out). I'm tired of listening to this crap, where if the guy says that God exists he gets "credit" for it.
That's the same horse manure that typifies the errors of Vatican II. Well, there's GOOD in all these false religions.
NO. We do not take isolated truths or errors outside the framework in which they exist. If someone says God exists, that's not true if that religion blasphemes Our Lord. And for those Prots who appear to show some reverence to Our Lord, no they do NOT honor Our Lord ... when they deride his Blessed Mother.
This crap needs to stop now or you guys are going to lose your faith and get sucked into the Conciliar Entity just like SSPX is doing now.
Leo XIV is a CONCILIAR MODERNIST HERETIC, and if he utters or mutters a proposition that happens to be true IN ISOLATION, that does not mean it's actually true.
If I saw a spoonful of sugar that contained a lethal amount of arsenic, I'm not going to walk around praising the qualities of the sugar, telling people how tasty it is ... lest they be tempted to give it a try. I call out the POISON that's in the sugar.
In fact, the more sugar there is in it, the more the taste of the lethal arsenic is hidden so that someone might just lick it all up without even noticing.
That's precisely the tactic of this Conciliar Kayfabe ... so stop falling for this crap. It's the same thing they used to deceive the Trumptards. Don't you see that the same people are orchestrating both dramas and using the same tacitcs? You put an egregious over-the-top Leftist into office for 4 years, so that by comparison Trump comes in looking like a Pat Buchanan type of conservative, and people buy into the playacting. Similarly, after Bergoglio's egregous / outrageous over-the-top heresy, by comparison this Leo character looks like he's just slightly to the left of St. Pius X.
It's done PRECISELY to manipulate weak minds. Snap out of it.
Let's take the following proposition: "God exists, and there is one God." Oh, yes, in cha-wiaty we must say it's true.
OK, but what if this sentence is in this paragraph: "God exists, and there is one God. Jesus Christ was a false prophet and a blasphemer and it was right to crucify Him."
So, is that still true? Are you going to blubber on about how the first sentence is true and thereby indirectly try to legitimate the vile erroneous whole.
Stop it. This Leo character is a Bergoglian Modernist.
I thought it would take a Sarah or Burke to fool Traddies, but evidently they can pull it off by installing a lifelong Bergoglian who would never have been promoted by Jorge had he a single Traditional Catholic bone in his body.
Also, this Trad, inc. crap has to stop also, where "ah, if he rolls back Amoris Laetitia and Fiducia Supplicans, then he's some Traditionliast." What's he rolling it back to? ... Answer: the same Modernist framework that has been destroying faith in souls since ca. 1965. So now we're going to swallow that pre-Bergoglian Conciliar religion.
How are people so stupid? Or is it faithless?
See, I've come to the conclusion that the Michael Matts and Taylor Marshalls of the world are greater enemies of the Catholic Faith than the open Modernists like Bergoglio
Is there some particular reason you assume these two in particular are doing it on purpose? I know you’ve argued with other people on here who have argued indult types are always in bad faith in general . So why these two specifically?
Is there some particular reason you assume these two in particular are doing it on purpose? I know you’ve argued with other people on here who have argued indult types are always in bad faith in general . So why these two specifically?
... but one red light to me was referring to "Mary, Mother of the Church", refusing her the title Mother of God.
The fifth title (out of 54) given to the Blessed Mother in the Litany of Loreto is Mother of the Church.
Let us pray there is a legitimate successor to Pope Michael I
There is ...Crazytown. This guy is married
(https://magnuslundberg.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/364224879_709589154515790_1570558916041982898_n.jpg?w=700)
https://magnuslundberg.net/2023/08/10/habemus-papam-michael-ii/
Crazytown. This guy is married
https://youtu.be/DsB6aXEWCeMGreat video :laugh1: Pope Michael I was certainly more Catholic than any of the conciliar usurpers
Great video :laugh1: Pope Michael I was certainly more Catholic than any of the conciliar usurpers
My mother use to tell us "the devil will tell you 1,000 truths to get in one lie."
ByzCat,
Perhaps you’ve noticed that Trad media has been systematically infiltrated and sold out?
That ʝʊdɛօ-masonic battle for the hearts & minds of Our Lady’s remnant is aimed at true Tradition.
Matt is a 3rd generation trad newspaper man, who appeared to cave-in to judaic pressures as far back as 2008.
It was this year that he published a small article acknowledging judaism on the front page of his newspaper. It was a sign of some sort.
Since then, he’s compromised on a lot. His ridiculous “Unite the Tribes” campaign being one example.
In essence, he’s saying:
“Give up all your issues concerning the Faith and be one ecuмenical trad family.”
Wouldn’t the jews just love that?
On Dr. Taylor Marshall,
he came from a similar path as recent Marranos (Scott Hahn, Gerry Matatics) They’re jews who went through Protestant seminaries and converted to Catholicism.
Marshal and Hahn are both admitted Opus Dei members.
Marshalls zeal to gain media dominance is well docuмented.
We can say over 90% of his stuff is trad Catholic, that he cuts & pastes up, for our consumption.
With this pseudo-credibility, he assumes the posture of an expert on Catholicism and many faithful fall for it.
This vacuum happens when our Catholic bishops are silent.
Essentially, the Marrano MO is to gain and use their media credentials to provide misdirection at key junctures.
Such as Malachi Martin’s promotion of the jew, Wojtyla being Christ’s great & true vicar.
Lovely ... except that it's used by the Modernists in order not to offend Modernists.An assertion for which you provide ZERO citations for. Which other titles given to our Blessed Mother by the Church (the Litany of Loreto was approved by Pope Sixtus V in 1587) do you object to?
| Holy Mary, | Pray for us. |
| Holy Mother of God, | Pray for us. |
| Holy Virgin of virgins, | Pray for us. |
| Mother of Christ, | Pray for us. |
| Mother of the Church, | Pray for us. |
| Mother of Mercy, | Pray for us. |
| Mother of Divine Grace, | Pray for us. |
| Mother of Hope, | Pray for us. |
| Mother most pure, | Pray for us. |
| Mother most chaste, | Pray for us. |
| Mother inviolate, | Pray for us. |
| Mother undefiled, | Pray for us. |
| Mother most amiable, | Pray for us. |
| Mother admirable, | Pray for us. |
| Mother of good counsel, | Pray for us. |
| Mother of our Creator, | Pray for us. |
| Mother of our Savior, | Pray for us. |
| Virgin most prudent, | Pray for us. |
| Virgin most venerable, | Pray for us. |
| Virgin most renowned, | Pray for us. |
| Virgin most powerful, | Pray for us. |
| Virgin most merciful, | Pray for us. |
| Virgin most faithful, | Pray for us. |
| Mirror of justice, | Pray for us. |
| Seat of wisdom, | Pray for us. |
| Cause of our joy, | Pray for us. |
| Spiritual vessel, | Pray for us. |
| Vessel of honour, | Pray for us. |
| Singular vessel of devotion, | Pray for us. |
| Mystical rose, | Pray for us. |
| Tower of David, | Pray for us. |
| Tower of ivory, | Pray for us. |
| House of gold, | Pray for us. |
| Ark of the covenant, | Pray for us. |
| Gate of heaven, | Pray for us. |
| Morning star, | Pray for us. |
| Health of the sick, | Pray for us. |
| Refuge of sinners, | Pray for us. |
| Solace of migrants, | Pray for us. |
| Comfort of the afflicted, | Pray for us. |
| Help of Christians, | Pray for us. |
| Queen of Angels, | Pray for us. |
| Queen of Patriarchs, | Pray for us. |
| Queen of Prophets, | Pray for us. |
| Queen of Apostles, | Pray for us. |
| Queen of Martyrs, | Pray for us. |
| Queen of Confessors, | Pray for us. |
| Queen of Virgins, | Pray for us. |
| Queen of all Saints, | Pray for us. |
| Queen conceived without original sin, | Pray for us. |
| Queen assumed into Heaven, | Pray for us. |
| Queen of the most Holy Rosary, | Pray for us. |
| Queen of families, | Pray for us. |
| Queen of peace. | Pray for us. |
https://youtu.be/DsB6aXEWCeM