Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: White smoke at Vatican  (Read 13646 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: White smoke at Vatican
« Reply #135 on: May 09, 2025, 07:36:56 AM »
As mentioned, it's naturally impossible that they would get a "Pope" on the second day every single time since Montini ... unless they had already pre-selected who they were going to roll out.

The second post above is spot on, and demonstrates the whole conclave was a farce
in keeping with everything since Vatican II. Nothing will change with post-Vatican II popes.
Just keep the faith, save your soul and those of your loved ones.
How God gets rid of them we will have to wait to see.



Re: White smoke at Vatican
« Reply #136 on: May 09, 2025, 08:20:07 AM »



His (hell) eyes, nose and mouth signal racial crypto-jew, likely from his momma's side as her ancestry, by narrative, is so muddled.
There’s a recent precedent with JPII and his Jєωιѕн mother, surname “Katz”.

He spent his entire pontificate judaizing the Church.

Provost’s nose looks in part to be a very commercial, practical nose which is typical for the jew.


Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: White smoke at Vatican
« Reply #137 on: May 09, 2025, 08:57:07 AM »
So, apart from the physiognomy controversy, am I the only one that thinks his physical appearance suggests a certain orientation?  I thought I was until Brother Nathanael posted something imply that as well.







Re: White smoke at Vatican
« Reply #138 on: May 09, 2025, 09:17:51 AM »
So, apart from the physiognomy controversy, am I the only one that thinks his physical appearance suggests a certain orientation?  I thought I was until Brother Nathanael posted something imply that as well.







What kind of man desires to become a novus ordo presider?  Or enter into the purple palace seminaries?  What kind of fruit can the Novus Ordo establishment produce?  It should be obvious to anyone with eyes to see that the Vatican ll religion is not the Catholic religion and the men who enter those seminaries are not intending to become Catholic priests.

Re: White smoke at Vatican
« Reply #139 on: May 09, 2025, 09:28:23 AM »
So, apart from the physiognomy controversy, am I the only one that thinks his physical appearance suggests a certain orientation?  I thought I was until Brother Nathanael posted something imply that as well.







Just about every bishop, cardinal and a good majority of the novus ordo priests I've seen all seem to have a deficit of testosterone. One would never characterize them as being masculine by any stretch of the imagination. I believe the apostles, martyrs, and hierarchy up to the last hundred years had far more in common in terms of appearance with Sean Connery than these men, whom would look right at home attending a Barbara Streisand concert or working as a florist in San Francisco.