Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: White smoke at Vatican  (Read 10515 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline cassini

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3917
  • Reputation: +3093/-275
  • Gender: Male
Re: White smoke at Vatican
« Reply #135 on: May 09, 2025, 07:36:56 AM »
  • Thanks!3
  • No Thanks!0
  • As mentioned, it's naturally impossible that they would get a "Pope" on the second day every single time since Montini ... unless they had already pre-selected who they were going to roll out.

    The second post above is spot on, and demonstrates the whole conclave was a farce
    in keeping with everything since Vatican II. Nothing will change with post-Vatican II popes.
    Just keep the faith, save your soul and those of your loved ones.
    How God gets rid of them we will have to wait to see.



    Offline Incredulous

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 9438
    • Reputation: +9242/-926
    • Gender: Male
    Re: White smoke at Vatican
    « Reply #136 on: May 09, 2025, 08:20:07 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0



  • His (hell) eyes, nose and mouth signal racial crypto-jew, likely from his momma's side as her ancestry, by narrative, is so muddled.
    There’s a recent precedent with JPII and his Jєωιѕн mother, surname “Katz”.

    He spent his entire pontificate judaizing the Church.

    Provost’s nose looks in part to be a very commercial, practical nose which is typical for the jew.
    "Some preachers will keep silence about the truth, and others will trample it underfoot and deny it. Sanctity of life will be held in derision even by those who outwardly profess it, for in those days Our Lord Jesus Christ will send them not a true Pastor but a destroyer."  St. Francis of Assisi


    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 46993
    • Reputation: +27841/-5168
    • Gender: Male
    Re: White smoke at Vatican
    « Reply #137 on: May 09, 2025, 08:57:07 AM »
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!1
  • So, apart from the physiognomy controversy, am I the only one that thinks his physical appearance suggests a certain orientation?  I thought I was until Brother Nathanael posted something imply that as well.







    Offline Michelle

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 445
    • Reputation: +502/-60
    • Gender: Female
    Re: White smoke at Vatican
    « Reply #138 on: May 09, 2025, 09:17:51 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • So, apart from the physiognomy controversy, am I the only one that thinks his physical appearance suggests a certain orientation?  I thought I was until Brother Nathanael posted something imply that as well.







    What kind of man desires to become a novus ordo presider?  Or enter into the purple palace seminaries?  What kind of fruit can the Novus Ordo establishment produce?  It should be obvious to anyone with eyes to see that the Vatican ll religion is not the Catholic religion and the men who enter those seminaries are not intending to become Catholic priests.

    Offline VerdenFell

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 310
    • Reputation: +284/-37
    • Gender: Male
    Re: White smoke at Vatican
    « Reply #139 on: May 09, 2025, 09:28:23 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!1
  • So, apart from the physiognomy controversy, am I the only one that thinks his physical appearance suggests a certain orientation?  I thought I was until Brother Nathanael posted something imply that as well.







    Just about every bishop, cardinal and a good majority of the novus ordo priests I've seen all seem to have a deficit of testosterone. One would never characterize them as being masculine by any stretch of the imagination. I believe the apostles, martyrs, and hierarchy up to the last hundred years had far more in common in terms of appearance with Sean Connery than these men, whom would look right at home attending a Barbara Streisand concert or working as a florist in San Francisco. 


    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 46993
    • Reputation: +27841/-5168
    • Gender: Male
    Re: White smoke at Vatican
    « Reply #140 on: May 09, 2025, 09:34:09 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • What kind of man desires to become a novus ordo presider?  Or enter into the purple palace seminaries?  What kind of fruit can the Novus Ordo establishment produce?  It should be obvious to anyone with eyes to see that the Vatican ll religion is not the Catholic religion and the men who enter those seminaries are not intending to become Catholic priests.

    AND, once you get in, ESPECIALLY during the era he was there, it was 100% "Good bye, good men" in the NO "seminaries", where they were absolutely infested with sodomy, and heresy, and if you were even slightly convervative, or straight ... you got the boot.

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 46993
    • Reputation: +27841/-5168
    • Gender: Male
    Re: White smoke at Vatican
    « Reply #141 on: May 09, 2025, 09:35:21 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!2
  • So perhaps it doesn't strike other people the same way, but I know a sodomite who has facial expressions almost identical to Prevost, and that one expression where he's with Wojtyla ... there's no mistaking that.

    Offline VerdenFell

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 310
    • Reputation: +284/-37
    • Gender: Male
    Re: White smoke at Vatican
    « Reply #142 on: May 09, 2025, 10:24:17 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • The scientific establishment has derided the study of physiognomy as it relates to personality type, character and sɛҳuąƖ orientation as a pseudo science. These are the same people who haven't provided any scientific data to 
    support their claim that homos and trannies were born that way.
    Throughout my life I have found that the conclusions I've drawn about someone based on physiognomy alone
    have been 100% spot on. It is simply pattern recognition and it is almost immediate. 
    Much of Jєωιѕн propaganda attempts to short circuit this very natural reaction we have been equipped with for self preservation.
    That is why (((they))) have to spend billions to convince White women that black men are desirable. 
    It's not just the lisp, mannerisms, and manner of dress that give homos away. 
    I've found that many sodomites have somewhat bulging eyes, a condition known as exophthalmos.
    It's what gives them that unmistakable, leering predatory look. 
    With lesbians they tend to have very thin lips and stronger jaw law lines. 
    It's a composite of many factors but very few homos look like Rock Hudson.
    For a brief period I worked in Chicago's Lakeview area, which is known locally as "Boystown" as it's the hub of
    the sodomite community.  
    What struck me most about all the homos walking up and down the street was the dysgenic quality most of them had. 
    Quite the opposite of the stylish, healthy, handsome apollos Hollywood portrays them as. 
     


    Offline Minnesota

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2384
    • Reputation: +1357/-646
    • Gender: Male
    Re: White smoke at Vatican
    « Reply #143 on: May 09, 2025, 10:52:00 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • What kind of man desires to become a novus ordo presider?  Or enter into the purple palace seminaries?  What kind of fruit can the Novus Ordo establishment produce?  It should be obvious to anyone with eyes to see that the Vatican ll religion is not the Catholic religion and the men who enter those seminaries are not intending to become Catholic priests.
    There are some rather orthodox priests in the NO these days. The younger generation ordained in the last decade is a big example.
    Christ is Risen! He is risen indeed

    Offline Incredulous

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 9438
    • Reputation: +9242/-926
    • Gender: Male
    Re: White smoke at Vatican
    « Reply #144 on: May 09, 2025, 10:57:23 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • Has anyone mentioned Chicago’s leading ecclesiastical reputation for liberalism, apostasy and satanism?

    This was Cardinal Bernadin’s stomping grounds.

    Bernadin’s legacy

    How much did this whacked Diocese affect pope Leo XIV ?

    "Some preachers will keep silence about the truth, and others will trample it underfoot and deny it. Sanctity of life will be held in derision even by those who outwardly profess it, for in those days Our Lord Jesus Christ will send them not a true Pastor but a destroyer."  St. Francis of Assisi

    Offline Matthew

    • Mod
    • *****
    • Posts: 33015
    • Reputation: +29313/-599
    • Gender: Male
    Re: White smoke at Vatican
    « Reply #145 on: May 09, 2025, 10:59:13 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!1



  • His (hell) eyes, nose and mouth signal racial crypto-jew, likely from his momma's side as her ancestry, by narrative, is so muddled.

    You're crazy. Besides his "Roman nose", I see no Jєωιѕн features on his face.
    I know all the Jєωιѕн features. I'm 100% aware on the JQ.
    Mark79 will vouch for me that I'm a completely awake on the JQ.
    But I don't see Jews under every bush. I'm not paranoid.


    Want to say "thank you"? 
    You can send me a gift from my Amazon wishlist!
    https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

    My accounts (Paypal, Venmo) have been (((shut down))) PM me for how to donate and keep the forum going.


    Offline Mr G

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2418
    • Reputation: +1584/-94
    • Gender: Male
    Re: White smoke at Vatican
    « Reply #146 on: May 09, 2025, 12:19:10 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0

  • Pope Leo XIV's words from the balcony: Full transcript - LifeSite
    "To all of you, brothers and sisters from Rome, from Italy, from all over the world, we want to be a synodal Church, a Church that walks, a Church that always seeks peace, that always seeks charity, that always seeks to be close especially to those who suffer."

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 46993
    • Reputation: +27841/-5168
    • Gender: Male
    Re: White smoke at Vatican
    « Reply #147 on: May 09, 2025, 12:24:37 PM »
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!1
  • You're crazy. Besides his "Roman nose", I see no Jєωιѕн features on his face.
    I know all the Jєωιѕн features. I'm 100% aware on the JQ.
    Mark79 will vouch for me that I'm a completely awake on the JQ.
    But I don't see Jews under every bush. I'm not paranoid.

    Well, since you posted that physiognomy chart, I do say he bares a striking resemblance to the "Demon" category.  Look closely.  That would be rather ironic.

    Not saying that proves or disproves anything though.  :laugh1:

    Offline Minnesota

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2384
    • Reputation: +1357/-646
    • Gender: Male
    Re: White smoke at Vatican
    « Reply #148 on: May 09, 2025, 12:28:09 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • It may not be rigged, but it was heavily favored towards Leo XIV. I am becoming increasingly convinced that he is who Francis hand-picked and groomed as his successor. 

    Here's how you know: Why else was he made a Cardinal only two and a half years ago? Why did he go from being consecrated as a bishop to Pope in 10 years? The 10th anniversary of his consecration as Bishop of Chiclayo, Peru, was just this past December. 

    They're very similar in practice: Both spent much time in impoverished parts of South America, both are theologically fairly liberal, both are big fans of "synodality," and both were heavy critics of Trump, Vance, and GOP immigration policy.
    Christ is Risen! He is risen indeed

    Offline VerdenFell

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 310
    • Reputation: +284/-37
    • Gender: Male
    Re: White smoke at Vatican
    « Reply #149 on: May 09, 2025, 12:52:23 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • It may not be rigged, but it was heavily favored towards Leo XIV. I am becoming increasingly convinced that he is who Francis hand-picked and groomed as his successor.

    Here's how you know: Why else was he made a Cardinal only two and a half years ago? Why did he go from being consecrated as a bishop to Pope in 10 years? The 10th anniversary of his consecration as Bishop of Chiclayo, Peru, was just this past December.

    They're very similar in practice: Both spent much time in impoverished parts of South America, both are theologically fairly liberal, both are big fans of "synodality," and both were heavy critics of Trump, Vance, and GOP immigration policy.
    I think the primary reason Francis and Leo XIV oppose Trump on immigration is because that's been the biggest moneymaker for the conciliar church as they have received billions in contracts through Catholic Charities to resettle the invaders. 
    The novus ordo has been selling off hospitals, schools, nursing homes, orphanages, and churches left and right, many times at fire sale prices, because the churches are empty and they need money to pay settlements for all the child molesters they protected. Just think of the legal fees they have had to pay before the settlements!
    Cupich has closed over 88 churches since 2020 alone!

    of course there's sheer malevolence at work as well in approving mass immigration into White nations.