If you would actually READ what Thomas says about sacrilege, you'd realize that there are various kinds and degrees of gravity. Now you make the novel claim that a sin against a creature is directly against God all else being equal.
It's not a novel claim that murder is considered a sin directly against God, it's right there in the Summa.
Yet, Thomas says that spiritual sins are more grave than moral crimes of which murder is one of them. Trampling on the Sacred Host is a graver sin than anything in the natural order.
Prove that he says it's worse than murder or unnatural vice - especially given that the intention to desecrate is not there - and St. Thomas mentions intention as a determining factor of gravity. I understand and acknowledge what he says - you don't.
Of course not
Definite proof of your intellectual dishonesty or simple lack of intellectual capacity.
and you simply said it didn't apply, without stating why.
I did say why, and I was right to say your example doesn't apply.
That's because you're a contrarian who makes things up as his ego gets bruised.
I'm capable of engaging in an actual argument, I don't retreat into personal attacks and ridiculous crowing about how your opponent has no idea what they're talking about. Yes, murder is worse than sacrilegious communion. A priest would stop mass to prevent a murder - but he's required to give a secret impenitent communion.
One degree of Sanctifying grace is worth more than the totality of the universe. Therefore, anything that destroys this grace is a worse act than anything in the moral order as Thomas was just quoted as saying, which of course you ignored.
Sure, and that has nothing to do with whether or not murder is worse or better than sacrilegious communion.
Here you minimize a sacrilege by gross negligence in order to force your opinion.
It's not minimizing sacrilege to say it's not worse than murder. Sorry clown.
That's pretty sad and actually very intellectually dishonest.
You're very pathetic.