[LaramieHirsch]

I'm sure it's been discussed here.  Can anyone remember any particular thread that discusses it the most?

I am looking for conversations about Pope Francis being non-canonically elected.

[poche]

That is not true. The cardinals all met in the Sistine Chapel. They closed the doors. Later on white smoke came out of the chimney. A prelate came to the window and said, "Habemus Papam..." Out came Pope Francis (formerly known as Jorge Bergoglio) None of the cardinals disputes that Francis was elected.    

[RomanCatholic1953]

That is not true. The cardinals all met in the Sistine Chapel. They closed the doors. Later on white smoke came out of the chimney. A prelate came to the window and said, "Habemus Papam..." Out came Pope Francis (formerly known as Jorge Bergoglio) None of the cardinals disputes that Francis was elected.    

Poche is my favorite punching bag!

All so called Popes since JXXIII were and are non-canonically elected to the papacy.
JXXIII for being a Freemason, PVI for signing the docuмents of V2, and JP1, JP2,
Benedict XVI and the current Francis for continuing the V2 revolution in which the
True Church of Jesus Christ has been hidden, however, never will be destroyed.
Yes, the subject has been discussed, just do a google search, you will find many
convincing threads.

[RomanCatholic1953]

If you do a Google search of Pope Paul VI Mother's tombstone, it is full of masonic
symbols. Monsignor Montini designed the tombstone himself according to
the Holy Office in the Vatican under PPXII. This shows that PPVI was a secret
freemason when elevated to the Papacy in 1963.
The successor so-called popes all had a mansonic mentality. This can be proven
in the papal docuмents of the post V2 era.

[PG]

1953 - what you are saying really has nothing to do with their elections.  

The reason I see for doubt about francis' claim to the papacy revolves mainly around the oddities occurring with ratzinger and francis.  Ratzinger is out of place, as is francis.  And, I don't believe that there is anything doctrinally different in the new church of today from the new church of the 1960s.  There has been a liberal stability to it.  I don't see it as getting worse.  So, with that said, the oddities of the current claimants raises suspicion.  And, that suspicion has bearing on the election of francis.  I don't feel like naming all of the oddities of their situation, but it is enough to have a doubt about francis' election.  However, it is a small doubt for me.  

[LaramieHirsch]

So, there is no such thread?  Okay.

[Capt McQuigg]

So, there is no such thread?  Okay.

I don't remember actually seeing one.  

[Ladislaus]

He's probably thinking of the St. Francis Prophecy thread about the uncanonically-elected Pope.

http://www.cathinfo.com/catholic.php/St-Francis-of-Assisi-Prophecy

[LaramieHirsch]

Before the recent St. Francis of Assisi thread.

I could swear we covered this before.  Perhaps in one of those discussions about Pope Benedict still being pope.

What would make a pope uncanonically elected?

[Geremia]

The thread that quotes Fr. Kramer's on "sedebenediciplenism"?

[RomanCatholic1953]

The reason I stick in what I said is that almost all of the Cardinals that voted for
Francis are public heretics. And, this cannot be denied.
If there is no previous thread on Francis not being canonically elected to the papacy,
this start it here.