CM7, I took note also of how the sedes were/are regarded by everyone and derided by most. Often I would think that, if they are so deluded and "insane", why bother with them at all? Surely if they are that bad, everyone can see that and the sedes would be completely ignored.
But, no. Articles continue to appear in which, along with the supposed "debunktion" (don't think it is a word, but it serves the purpose at this moment) of the sede theory, the authors do nothing but hurl vicious insults at them.
If the sedes are so wrong, truly, would this be necessary? Plus, I am not a good fence sitter - it is either I am for the pope completely or I am not - none of this picking and choosing for me.
That's the way I look at it. It is different for everyone.