I've been emailing an SSPX priest about how I can return to the faith, praying the rosary, and reading good spiritual books, but something is still making me wonder about traditionalism.
Clearly, as has been discussed here many, many times, syllogisms about dogma are not themselves dogma. Lots of people claim different things about dogma, and believe they're certainly correct, even when they're not (and the vast, vast majority of people are not): this is the big reason that I ended up frustrated when I was Orthodox, and could never seriously entertain Protestantism. This also applies to Catholicism, though. For instance, when people like the Dimonds, Novus Ordo Watch, R&Rers, and Steven Speray say their arguments are dogma, I get really skeptical- I could never support any of them again either, not even considering the terrible scruples falling prey to that gave me when I was first traditional Catholic.
How far does this principle go, though? I find a lot of the arguments about the New Rites of ordination being doubtful convincing, for example. Yet, at the same time, I could be completely wrong. I find it hard to believe a faithful Novus Ordo attendee would need to use private judgment and become a sedevacantist or an SSPX-goer to attain graces, confession, and salvation, when understanding yourself to be fallible and trusting the Church's dogmatic statements over your own syllogisms about faith is the main reasons Catholicism is so distinctly truthful compared to other religions. If one's own arguments about theology come before the actual arc of the Church, in other words if you must be a self-created theologian to even determine where the Church is, then the whole system becomes no different than Protestantism or Orthodoxy.
Are there policies in place for what a faithful Catholic should do when they view a sacrament as doubtful? Where do these policies come from? Moreover, to what extent do traditionalists have to follow their own interpretations of dogma? It does seem like one could simply attend a traditional mass with a validly ordained priest based on doubt without doing any private judgment other than following one's conscience, but on the other side of the spectrum, if the sacraments of the conciliar Church were truly invalid, then it seems you'd have to make private judgments before finding the Church... again, leading to the problems of Protestantism and Orthodoxy. Any thoughts?