Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: What Vatican II Should Have Done  (Read 757 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Cantarella

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7782
  • Reputation: +4577/-579
  • Gender: Female
What Vatican II Should Have Done
« on: May 19, 2014, 02:19:10 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Bishop Sigaud's Letter to Cardinal Tardini

    Written on August 22, 1959

    In preparation for the Second Vatican Council (referred to as the Ecuмenical Council in the letter), Cardinal Tardini sent out a letter requesting suggestions from all the world’s bishops. Some of these replies are remarkable for their clear-sightedness. Here follows the response sent by Bishop Gerald de Proenca Sigaud, Bishop of Jacarezinho in Brazil, written on August 22, 1959 to Cardinal Tardini. This letter was formerly printed in The Angelus magazine.

    http://www.maroon.dti.ne.jp/gokyo/savebox/bishop_sigaud_letter-en.html
    Logged
    If anyone says that true and natural water is not necessary for baptism and thus twists into some metaphor the words of our Lord Jesus Christ" Unless a man be born again of water and the Holy Spirit" (Jn 3:5) let him be anathema.

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 41862
    • Reputation: +23919/-4344
    • Gender: Male
    What Vatican II Should Have Done
    « Reply #1 on: May 19, 2014, 02:37:11 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • No doubt this was promptly deposited in the "circular file" by the very same Masons and Communists and Jєωs about which the good bishop was sounding the alarm.
    Logged

    Offline Neil Obstat

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 18177
    • Reputation: +8276/-692
    • Gender: Male
    What Vatican II Should Have Done
    « Reply #2 on: May 20, 2014, 09:07:46 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • .

    I made a post with a copy of this version of the letter in the Resistance forum thread:

    http://www.cathinfo.com/catholic.php?a=topic&t=31821&min=10#p2

    .
    Logged
    .--. .-.-.- ... .-.-.- ..-. --- .-. - .... . -.- .. -. --. -.. --- -- --..-- - .... . .--. --- .-- . .-. .- -. -.. -....- -....- .--- ..- ... - -.- .. -.. -.. .. -. --. .-.-.

    Offline songbird

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 4670
    • Reputation: +1765/-353
    • Gender: Female
    What Vatican II Should Have Done
    « Reply #3 on: May 20, 2014, 11:04:52 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • I understand that Vatican II was not desired by those clergy that were on God's side.  Those clergy saw enough that if a council came to be, they knew it would be bad, and we see that.  Now, how I came to understand this, I don't recall, maybe someone else can recall this.  
    Logged

    Offline RomanCatholic1953

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 10512
    • Reputation: +3267/-207
    • Gender: Male
    • I will not respond to any posts from Poche.
    What Vatican II Should Have Done
    « Reply #4 on: May 20, 2014, 12:18:27 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • I remember many talks by the Nuns at my Parochial School I attended.
    We all agreed that the Third Message of our Lady of Fatima was going
    to read at the Council. And, acted upon.
    The revolution and the changes never entered into the conversation,
    such as Holy Mass in English, Priest facing the people. And the
    betrayal of Catholic teachings of 1,960 years.
    If we could look a few years into the future. And saw what really
    transpired. We would rather died a martyrs death than join in all
    this coming destruction.
    Now, this parochial school is now one the most liberal and progressive
    in the Archdiocese of Los Angeles.
    Logged
    Pages: [1]
    « previous next »