Y
Interesting private interpretation and opinion, but the de facto reality is that the overwhelming majority of bishops adopted it and used it. In her totality, the bishops United to the Pope, if they propose something to us for our use explaining it to be good and not evil (even if it is objectively abused later and implemented in a destructive way) can you say the Church has proposed that we do this evil and sacrilegious thing? How is this picking and choosing for ourselves not the same as the Jansenists and their Synod of Pistoia?
You don't have the slightest concept of the nature of Law, do you? Even if no one obeys it, it's still the standing law of the Church. "Whatever you bind on earth is bound in heaven" applies here.
The de facto reality is that the overwhelming majority of bishops, united to the Pope, are committing grave acts of disobedience, mortally sinful in the (at least) objective order, each day.
And that's just the point: There is
no law giving permission, let alone cooercing, anyone to use the missal. The Church has
not proposed that we "do this evil and sacrilegious thing". Quite the contrary.
I'm not sure how you can run around screaming "obedience" at the top of your lungs when the very act of saying the New Mass is a sin of disobedience.