Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: What role did Wright play against Fr Feeney?  (Read 954 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Francisco

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1150
  • Reputation: +843/-18
  • Gender: Male
What role did Wright play against Fr Feeney?
« on: June 25, 2014, 03:24:37 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • As Auxilliary Bishop of Boston did John Wright have any role to play in the condemnation of Fr Feeney?. If he did, given his alleged unsavoury character, could he have been manipulated by Progressivists against the Traditionalist Feeney?. And if manipulated what would that make of the legality of the condemnation by the Holy See of Fr Feeney?

    Randy Engel has him listed in her book the Rite of Sodomy. As Cardinal Wright he was one of three cardinals who issued a condemnation of the SSPX in 1975 (see article below). What is omitted in this article is that a few years earlier he had given Archbishop Lefebvre a Letter of Commendation, which is used as evidence to show that the Society was a properly established ecclesiastical organization. Wonder if Abp Lefebvre, with all his contacts in the Holy See, was unaware of the allegedly ugly character of this prelate.



    http://theunhivedmind.com/wordpress/randy-engel-asks-is-benedict-xvi-a-ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ/

    Publication of the December 29, 2008
    http://www.virgo-maria.org/D-Eglise_Conciliaire/le-vatican-homosexuel.html
    The New Oxford Review (conciliar) identifies the book Mrs. Randy Engel docuмenting and denouncing the “gαy colonization of the Catholic Church”<cut> “Randy Engel, The Rite of Sodomy, in July 2006. The VM contains important elements of the role of ‘cardinal’ pederast Wright (Prefect of the Congregation for the Clergy), active support of the high false-Masonry and traditionalist (denounced as a ‘traitor’ by Jean Madiran), who condemned Lefebvre May 6, 1975, at the request of the ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ Montini-Paul VI (asserting that Randy Engel devotes chapter 19 of his book), and decided the removal of SSPX.
    The text of Ms. Engel that we quote includes (see Appendix A) very painful scenes of ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ rape (“the coca cola”) made by the future Cardinal Wright, Bishop of Worcester (Pius XII established the Diocese of Worcester on April 14, 1950, only to Wright), to another church. It is also about ‘Bishop’ Wuerl (recently promoted to archbishop ‘of Washington by Pope Benedict XVI), former personal secretary and protégé of’ Bishop ‘Wright. It is precisely this same abominable ‘Cardinal’ Wright who participated in the commission of three cardinals who judged and condemned Archbishop Lefebvre in the Vatican May 6, 1975.



    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 41898
    • Reputation: +23941/-4344
    • Gender: Male
    What role did Wright play against Fr Feeney?
    « Reply #1 on: June 25, 2014, 07:04:27 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Not to mention that Cushing was an open heretic.  "No salvation outside the Church?  Nonsense."


    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 41898
    • Reputation: +23941/-4344
    • Gender: Male
    What role did Wright play against Fr Feeney?
    « Reply #2 on: June 25, 2014, 07:05:48 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • People refuse to admit that the Church did not just suddenly get infiltrated by Masons, Communists, ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs, and modernists one afternoon in 1962.  Those people who condemned Father Feeney were one and the same as those who brought to us Vatican II.

    Offline Francisco

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1150
    • Reputation: +843/-18
    • Gender: Male
    What role did Wright play against Fr Feeney?
    « Reply #3 on: June 25, 2014, 08:31:58 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Ladislaus
    People refuse to admit that the Church did not just suddenly get infiltrated by Masons, Communists, ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs, and modernists one afternoon in 1962.  Those people who condemned Father Feeney were one and the same as those who brought to us Vatican II.


    If the cards were stacked against Fr Feeney by these infiltrators, then the actions taken against him would have been null and void on these grounds alone.