The overall, summary argument against the New Rites is that...if they are valid, then all new rite cardinals, bishops, priests are valid. Which means the V2 "church" is 100% legitimate (at least from an operational perspective.)
On the contrary, if "legitimacy" was new-rome's goal, they would have kept the consecration/ordination rites "as is", with no changes, and simply changed the 'new mass' as they did, by way of Paul 6's "updates".
But "legitimacy" was not the goal...but "chaos". As the Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ goal tells us, 'order out of chaos'...which means that V2's goal, including the new consecration, ordination, and new mass formulas, was to introduce 'chaos' and confusion.
So the freemasons changed both priestly rites (consecration/ordination) and priestly functions (new sacraments/new mass).
They changed/touched every aspect of catholicism, and abused it, just like Our Lord's Holy Body was bruised and abused in every aspect...