Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: What do traditional Catholics think of Our Lady of Akita?  (Read 7515 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: What do traditional Catholics think of Our Lady of Akita?
« Reply #50 on: February 25, 2021, 06:01:53 AM »
There are plenty of Trad nuns.  Why does Our Lady not appear to one of them?

That way we would know it was true.

I think it is perfectly reasonable to doubt that Our Lady would appear to a novus ordo nun, if the novus ordo is "a bastard rite" that deliberately weakens the faith of Catholics (we know with human certainty it does that).

In addition the statue that is claimed to have wept miraculously at Akita is that of Our Lady of All Nations which is objectively speaking wrong on many points.  Here is one of those many points.
“THE LADY OF ALL NATIONS ARE THE LAST AND FINAL APPARITIONS OF OUR MOTHER TO THE NATIONS OF THIS WORLD.” (http://www.ladyofallnations.org)

To believe that these were "the last and final apparitions" of Mary to the world, one would have disbelieve the apparitions of Mary at Akita. Therefore, the claim that the apparitions to Ida Peerdeman are the last and final are false if Akita is true.

So Mary would either be making a statue of a false apparition weep miraculously, or, they are both false.

They cannot both be true.
Well, you must be bitter.  😉

I look at post Vatican II apparitions the same way I look at post Vatican II docuмents, catechisms, books, etc.  

Re: What do traditional Catholics think of Our Lady of Akita?
« Reply #51 on: February 25, 2021, 06:19:12 AM »
We have God’s promise that He will not again inundate the earth with water. After the flood there were just eight people. Life went on for those eight.

Presumably He will use fire.

Or disease, or a vaccine created by Godless men that goes wrong, or air, or earthquakes, or famine, or the climate goes wrong and we enter a new ice age, or Islam or China rises and oppresses the west for 500 years turning us into commie slaves, or we are invaded by aliens.
If you are dead what does it matter what killed you?
If you are alive, what does it matter what killed 99% of humans?
All a bit academic HOW it happens.  Who cares?  Nobody is standing there thinking, "I am sure happy that God did not use water again.  What a blessing!"
How long do these prophecies get to be validated?  If in the year 2875 there is a fiery meteor that destroys Luxembourg and Belgium is Akita true?
If the Sun has a CME burst in 2145 and the electronics are all fried and people starve in large numbers, does that count?  Is that fire falling from the sky or the grid failing and people dying from the collapse of a complex economic chain?
Given a long enough wait, almost any prophecy sufficiently vague can be fulfilled.  For the "seer" it is a one way bet if they don't make statements that are too specific or have a timeline attached.


Re: What do traditional Catholics think of Our Lady of Akita?
« Reply #52 on: February 25, 2021, 06:38:36 AM »
There are plenty of Trad nuns.  Why does Our Lady not appear to one of them?

That way we would know it was true.

I think it is perfectly reasonable to doubt that Our Lady would appear to a novus ordo nun, if the novus ordo is "a bastard rite" that deliberately weakens the faith of Catholics (we know with human certainty it does that).

In addition the statue that is claimed to have wept miraculously at Akita is that of Our Lady of All Nations which is objectively speaking wrong on many points.  Here is one of those many points.
“THE LADY OF ALL NATIONS ARE THE LAST AND FINAL APPARITIONS OF OUR MOTHER TO THE NATIONS OF THIS WORLD.” (http://www.ladyofallnations.org)

To believe that these were "the last and final apparitions" of Mary to the world, one would have disbelieve the apparitions of Mary at Akita. Therefore, the claim that the apparitions to Ida Peerdeman are the last and final are false if Akita is true.

So Mary would either be making a statue of a false apparition weep miraculously, or, they are both false.

They cannot both be true.

I think Ida was a post WWII zionist marrano, but that her apparition schtik can be disassociated from Our Lady of Akita.

Wherein did Our Lady of Akita mention any “Ida talk” such as I am Our Lady of All Nations
(which she is, by the way)?

No, Japan has the Catholic heritage, which the devil heavily persecuted. 

They are so fallen away, so materialistic, yet they could have been one of the greatest Catholic countries in the world, simply for the graces they received of understanding a natural order, a hierarchy of God’s world.

Our Lady of Akita intervened for Japan and so too, to Asia, to give them a wake-up call.

I will be changing my daily Rosary intentions to a penitential one, as Our Lady of Akita advised.

Re: What do traditional Catholics think of Our Lady of Akita?
« Reply #53 on: February 25, 2021, 07:11:12 AM »
Are you suggesting that in that convent the only statue of Our Lady they had was one of a false vision?

Yet that statue was chosen to weep miraculous tears?

I am sure there were other statues, or God's providence could have seen to it that a statue of Our Lady of Fatima made it to Japan by 1973.

Offline Pax Vobis

  • Supporter
Re: What do traditional Catholics think of Our Lady of Akita?
« Reply #54 on: February 25, 2021, 07:25:33 AM »
Quote
Presumably He will use fire.

The much prophesized comet..
.

Quote
Or disease, or a ναccιnє created by Godless men that goes wrong, or air, or earthquakes, or famine, or the climate goes wrong and we enter a new ice age, or Islam or ƈhıną rises and oppresses the west for 500 years turning us into commie slaves, or we are invaded by aliens.

Putting aside aliens, all the other calamities you mention will happen (per prophecy) before the comet comes...