Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: What an eminent theologian has said  (Read 701 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Kephapaulos

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1809
  • Reputation: +457/-15
  • Gender: Male
What an eminent theologian has said
« on: October 31, 2007, 12:58:19 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • "St. Robert Bellarmine's objection. The pope who becomes a secret heretic is still an actual member of the Church, for he is still the head of the Church, as Cajetan, Cano, Suarez, and others teach.

    Reply. This condition is quite abnormal, hence no wonder that something abnormal results from it, namely, that the pope becoming secretly a heretic would no longer be an actual member of the Church, according to the teaching as explained in the body of the article, but would still retain his jurisdiction by which he would influence the Church in ruling it. Thus he would still be nominally the head of the Church, which he would still rule as head, though he would no longer be a member of Christ, because he would not receive that vital influx of faith from Christ, the invisible and primary head. Thus in quite an abnormal manner he would be in point of jurisdiction the head of the Church, though he would not be a member of it.

    This condition could not apply to the natural head in its relation to the body, but such a condition is not repugnant in the case of the moral and secondary head. The reason is that, whereas the natural head must receive a vital influx from the soul before it can influence the members of its body, the moral head, such as the pope is, can exercise his jurisdiction over the Church, although he receives no influx of interior faith and charity from the soul of the Church. More briefly, as Billuart says, the pope is constituted a member of the Church by his personal faith, which he can lose, and his headship of the visible Church by jurisdiction and power is compatible with private heresy. The Church will always consist in the visible union of its members with its visible head, namely, the pope of Rome, although some, who externally seem to be members of the Church, may be private heretics. Thus the conclusion we must come to is, that occult heretics are only apparent members of the Church, which they externally and visibly profess to be the true Church."

    -Fr. Garrigou-Lagrange, O.P., Christ the Saviour, Chapter X, Question 8, Article 3

    http://www.thesumma.info/saviour/saviour37.php#bk2


    "Non nobis, Domine, non nobis; sed nomini tuo da gloriam..." (Ps. 113:9)


    Offline Kephapaulos

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1809
    • Reputation: +457/-15
    • Gender: Male
    What an eminent theologian has said
    « Reply #1 on: October 31, 2007, 01:12:30 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Before anyone points out the words "secret" or "private" from the quote as opposed to "manifest" or "public," either way we are dealing with the case of a pope falling into formal heresy.
    "Non nobis, Domine, non nobis; sed nomini tuo da gloriam..." (Ps. 113:9)