Catholic Info
Traditional Catholic Faith => Crisis in the Church => Topic started by: Miseremini on January 14, 2025, 06:14:53 PM
-
Pope says trads are mentally unbalanced in his just released book.
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/pope-francis-accuses-young-catholic-priests-who-like-the-latin-mass-of-mental-imbalance/?utm_source=daily-catholic-2025-01-14&utm_medium=email
-
He might be right, but it's better than being a heretic.
-
…it is unhealthy for the liturgy to become ideology,” said Francis.
Unsurprisingly the heresiarch brays the diametric opposite of "lex ordandi, lex credendi."
-
Meanwhile, ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity which was officially a mental condition up to very recent times, is considered OK if you want to enter a newchurch seminary.
-
Quote, "It is curious to see this fascination for what is not understood, for what appears somewhat hidden, and seems also at times to interest the younger generations." I would imagine that Pope Francis - if he is pope- for the traditional Catholic it matters not one way or the other if he is, for us nothing changes; he has a certain "fascination" with the Latin Mass precisely because he does not understand it. He has undoubtedly had very poor training in both philosophy and theology. I think the Latin Mass is mysterious and majestic for the simple fact that it is in Latin, everything else aside. Unfortunately Francis is the product of a very evil and unproductive age. He was "ordained" in December of 1969. These priests who studied and wrote in the 1960's have very little to say. The only exception would be a handful of traditional priests and a few of those who wrote in the early part of the 60's. If Francis is a priest, I know not; if he is a bishop, I know not; if he is pope, I know not. I am convinced that he is a baptized member of the Church, and for this a pray that he abandons his liberalism.
-
He might be right, but it's better than being a heretic.
:laugh1:
Good point!
-
When I got up yesterday morning, and turned on the news when they were talking about Francis, I wondered at first if he could have died during the night. No, it was just a talking head with fulsome praise for his new book.
-
I literally forget who is even sitting in Rome at this point. I honestly don't even care. Is this bad? :laugh1:
I'm so indifferent to what Berg-... Cornholio says, it's not even funny.(https://i.imgur.com/yUhLW8q.jpeg)
-
I literally forget who is even sitting in Rome at this point. I honestly don't even care. Is this bad? :laugh1:
I'm so indifferent to what Berg-... Cornholio says, it's not even funny.(https://i.imgur.com/yUhLW8q.jpeg)
Same. I think too much fuss is made by the daily "Bergoglio watchers". I care about what he says as much as I care about and follow what the "Archbishop" of Canterbury says on a daily basis.
-
Yeah- I don't know if it's wrong to care so little about what is going on in the Vatican with Jorge. It's just a bad movie that seems to have nothing to do with me so why waste my brain on it?
I don't think I ever had any outrage against him. He was never an actual significant figure to me.
Who cares if Jorge excommunicates you or your independent priest- really?
To me that's just a feather in the cap of the "excommunicant".
But maybe I should care? Not sure.